On 
                14th May 1953 Furtwängler, exasperated by the producer’s 
                demands for more and more takes during sessions for Schumann’s 
                Fourth Symphony, announced that he and the orchestra would play 
                the whole work through once, and the producer could take 
                it or leave it. He took it, and the result has been an inspiration 
                ever since, one of the most enthralling re-creations of a piece 
                of music ever committed to disc. Indeed, its influence can be 
                positively insidious, for once heard, it is difficult to imagine 
                the work any other way; the recent recording by Christian Thielemann 
                showed what a danger this can be for other conductors.  
              
 
              
The 
                question is, did Furtwängler himself always conduct it in 
                this way? For those of us who love the studio recording, the chance 
                to hear a live performance given a couple of years before is irresistible 
                and the answer is, yes, he conducted it in exactly the same way, 
                the same rubatos, the same spurts of impetuosity, even the orchestral 
                imprecisions are exactly the same and in the same places. As you 
                can see, I’m suspicious and, having compared the two first movements 
                closely in short stretches, I’m prepared to wager that this is 
                the 1953 studio recording in a transfer so dull as to reduce much 
                of the impact of the performance. There is, by the way, no evidence 
                of an audience present, and we know from real live recordings 
                what state the Berliners’ lungs were likely to be in by mid-March. 
                 
              
 
              
I 
                should add that no discography of Furtwängler that I’ve been 
                able to consult reports the existence of this performance (while 
                some Furtwängler performances known to exist – and listed 
                in the discographies - are still unissued and in private hands, 
                the chances of something new from 1951 surfacing now are remote). 
                They do, however, reveal that a performance from later in 1953 
                with the Lucerne Festival Orchestra has had a limited circulation, 
                so the question, "did he always conduct it this way?" 
                may yet receive an official answer.  
              
 
              
In 
                1953, when the Furtwängler cult was getting into its stride, 
                Decca issued on two LPs a complete concert given by the Vienna 
                Philharmonic under Furtwängler on 29th October 
                1951 in Munich. The programme consisted of Beethoven’s Coriolan 
                Overture, Schumann’s First Symphony and Bruckner’s 4th 
                in a very strange edition (more recently, this concert has been 
                issued by Orfeo). The Furtwängler/Schumann repertoire is 
                not exactly large (these two symphonies, Manfred Overture, the 
                piano and cello concertos and that’s it) so here, too, we can 
                only welcome the opportunity to hear him perform the First Symphony 
                with a different orchestra, in a different city, but on the same 
                date. Well now, I’m suspicious again. Furtwängler was a remarkable 
                chap, but I don’t believe that even he could have given two performances 
                of the same work, with different orchestras and in different cities, 
                on the same day. Of course, the performances are the same.  
              
 
              
Actually, 
                it is the fact that the same date is given which persuades me 
                that Aura are not deliberately misleading the public (if you’re 
                going to fake a performance you’d change the date too, wouldn’t 
                you?) but have rather themselves been misled by a muddle-minded 
                collector with a cellar full of badly labelled tapes. Still, they 
                might have checked up a bit more carefully.  
              
 
              
These 
                are great performances and I hope to discuss them in detail one 
                day. The present review is merely a warning – keep away! The Fourth, 
                incidentally, is still in copyright till the end of this year. 
                 
              
 
               
              
Christopher 
                Howell