Ludwig van BEETHOVEN (1770-1827)
          Piano Concerto No. 1 in C major, Op. 15 [31:16]
          Piano Concerto No. 5 in E-flat, Op. 73 
Emperor* [36:22]
          Walter Gieseking (piano)
          Philharmonia Orchestra/Rafael Kubelik
          *Grosses Funkorchester/Artur Rother
          rec. 13 October 1948, EMI Studio No. 1, Abbey Road, London; *23 January 
          1945, Saal Nr. 1, Haus des Rundfunks (Reichsender, Berlin)
          
MUSIC & ARTS CD-1142(1) [67:40]
          
           
          Walter Gieseking (1895-1956) was renowned above all for his Debussy 
          but he was no mean interpreter of the Classical repertoire, as these 
          two Beethoven performances show.
           
          The recording of the First Concerto was made for EMI and has been transferred 
          from 78s. By and large the transfer is successful though I noted a number 
          of places where the pitch wobbled a little, though never to such an 
          extent as to mar ones enjoyment. I was intrigued to read in Farhan Malik’s 
          booklet note that when the recording first appeared the name of the 
          conductor was withheld for contractual reasons. That’s ironic since 
          the conducting, especially of the first movement, is most distinguished. 
          Kubelik starts things softly, as it should be done, and what follows 
          is one of the most delightful accounts of this movement I can recall 
          hearing. The tempo is fleet and the playing is really light-footed. 
          Kubelik obtains very spruce results from the Philharmonia and when Gieseking 
          joins them his playing is elegant and nicely articulated. The music 
          has a truly Mozartian feel, which is completely appropriate. I loved 
          this fresh, crisp reading in which Gieseking and Kubelik seem completely 
          attuned.
           
          The slow movement is simple, unaffected and graceful. Gieseking’s playing 
          gives great pleasure and the important clarinet part is well taken. 
          I’m not quite so enamoured of the finale, however. The pace is surprisingly 
          steady and this, I’m sure, is the main reason why the performance sounds 
          po-faced and careful. To be sure, it’s all clear and civilised but the 
          music making lacks the essential sparkle. It’s rather a disappointment 
          after what has gone before and as a result I have to qualify my welcome.
           
          This recording of the 
Emperor Concerto is billed by Music & 
          Arts as “the only complete stereo recording of a classical work in stereo 
          surviving from [World War II]”. The performance has been released twice 
          before by this label (catalogue no. 637 in 1990 and catalogue no. 815 
          in 1994). I’ve heard neither of those releases but they must feature 
          a different transfer of the original source since both performances 
          on this present disc are now appearing in 2004 transfers by Aaron Z. 
          Snyder.
           
          From the recording date it will be noted that the performance was recorded 
          in the closing months of the war when conditions in Berlin must have 
          been pretty grim. Indeed, in his 
review 
          Jonathan Woolf commented 
that what 
          can only be the noise of anti-aircraft batteries can be heard for a 
          while, from 16:53 in the first movement just after the start of a solo 
          passage for the piano. How on earth the musicians concentrated under 
          such circumstances, let alone turned in a good performance, is beyond 
          me. It 
is a good performance, captured in remarkably good sound 
          given the age of the recording and the times in which it was made. There’s 
          excellent clarity and the one qualification I have about the sound is 
          that the orchestral bass is often somewhat booming. However, this is 
          not a serious issue.
           
          The first movement opens with a strong, energetic traversal of the orchestral 
          tutti. Gieseking’s playing is admirable: at times the lightness of his 
          fingerwork impresses – between 5:26 and 5:57, for example – while at 
          other times, such as the passage beginning at 10:20, he can be suitably 
          fiery. His interpretation of the slow movement is cultivated and then 
          both he and the orchestra offer a virile, energetic traversal of the 
          finale. The performance as a whole has its rough edges, mainly in the 
          orchestral playing, but it’s well worth hearing.
           
          
John Quinn
           
          See also 
review 
          by Colin Clarke and 
review 
          by Jonathan Woolf