The opening of Vaughan 
                Williams’ Fantasia on a Theme by Thomas Tallis here has 
                stillness, sheen and already the expansive measure which characterizes 
                the performance when all the string groups are playing. The sudden 
                fp (tr. 1 1:08) alerts you to the evocative soft tremolo 
                of the first violins ushering in a richly projected presentation 
                of the Tallis theme, vividly scaled down to pp at the end 
                (2:21) before a repeat which really is appassionato as 
                marked, with playing of great fervour. The muted, smaller second 
                orchestra which often gives out a swaying motif as a kind of refrain 
                is clearly differentiated from the first though perhaps not quite 
                as soft and mysterious as it might be. The central section which 
                brings first solo viola, then violin and string quartet of soloists 
                to the fore is presented in confident folksy manner. It’s forward, 
                glowing and fluent. In contrast, when eventually these soloists 
                and both orchestras join together and the texture becomes more 
                elaborate and dense Previn’s approach is one of savoured lyricism, 
                the poco a poco animando marking (10:52) only a fractional 
                limbering up to the broader climax (11:28) and not the spontaneous 
                combustion realized by the Sinfonia of London/John Barbirolli 
                (EMI 5672642), for me this work’s finest interpretation. After 
                the climax Previn’s second orchestra echoes do become chillingly 
                ghostly and the consistently fluent duet between solo violin and 
                viola is full of feeling and eloquence.
                
I compared Previn’s 
                  1988 recording with the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra (Telarc 
                  CD 80158). Its opening has more finesse but is also more self-conscious. 
                  The theme has a more sober dignity but its repeat is less passionate 
                  as it presses forward more. The second orchestra echoes are 
                  more eerie yet the solos in the central section are rather lugubrious 
                  in their expressiveness. But more animando before the 
                  climax here makes it more effective and the closing duet soulfully 
                  honours the melody.
                
Previn’s Curtis 
                  Institute account of Vaughan Williams’ Fifth symphony opens 
                  serenely with a lustrous string sound and steady focus, yet 
                  it also has a purpose and growth to its outpouring. The second 
                  theme (tr. 2 3:39) is balmy, the development (5:34) suddenly 
                  of a feathery insubstantiality in the strings and shadows of 
                  foreboding in the falling motif in the wind. The ensuing build 
                  up isn’t especially noteworthy but the strings’ climax is steely 
                  enough, after which the recapitulation is welcomed with relief 
                  and the second theme climax shines forth. 
                
              
I compared all three 
                Previn recordings. Here are the timings:
                
              
                   
                    | Timings | I | II | III | IV | Total | 
                   
                    
                  | Previn 1995 | 12:43 | 5:24 | 12:08 | 10:21 | 40:36 | 
                   
                    | Previn 1988 | 12:30 | 5:14 | 12:57 | 9:55 | 40:36 | 
                   
                    | Previn 1971 | 12:53 | 5:17 | 12:19 | 11:18 | 41:47 | 
                
                Previn first recorded 
                  this symphony with the London Symphony Orchestra in 1971 (RCA 
                  8287655 7082). The first movement is notable for the gentle 
                  insistence of its unfolding, the clarity and distinctness of 
                  texture, feel of all contributing and conviction of statement. 
                  The second theme is introduced and progresses with regal calm. 
                  The development contrasts glinting strings as if in the half 
                  light and ominous, energetic woodwind who whip the strings into 
                  a stormy outburst. In the recapitulation pristine calm is restored 
                  as the natural order, with a strong build up to a second theme 
                  climax of fiery avowal. The close is quizzical with the positive 
                  strings and negative woodwind elements side by side.
                
Previn’s second 
                  recording was with the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra in 1988 
                  (Telarc CD 80158). The recording has greater density and this 
                  brings a vivid sense of a distinctive and mysterious environment, 
                  but the sense of progression is less strong and the observation 
                  seems more objective, from a distance. The second theme is rather 
                  dreamily treated, its climax more formal.
                
The 1995 Curtis 
                  recording under review isn’t as assured or organic in feel as 
                  Previn’s 1971 yet has a sense of a journey of discovery which 
                  makes it more engaging than Previn’s 1988 recording. The more 
                  shadowy nature of the opening of the development is a greater 
                  contrast than the other recordings, its build up more gradual 
                  and climax less expected but thrilling all the same. The recapitulation 
                  is more relaxed at first, but with a powerful build up to a 
                  formally presented second theme climax. The two elements of 
                  the close are smoothly blended.
                
Previn’s Curtis 
                  Scherzo is characterized by lightness of touch in the strings 
                  and jaunty humour in the wind. The first Trio (tr. 3 2:00) is 
                  full bodied jollity in the wind against teeming strings. The 
                  second Trio (3:43) has more bite but is still jocular. Towards 
                  the close when the fast opening and recurring material is presented 
                  becalmed the strings could relax more but at the very end they 
                  are sensitively shimmering. The 1971 Previn Scherzo is similar 
                  in tone but somewhat sharper in focus. The first Trio is firmer 
                  with strings, woodwind and brass more distinctly differentiated 
                  in their neat balance, the second Trio is spikier yet still 
                  dapper, while the strings relax more expressively towards the 
                  close.
                
To open the Curtis 
                  Romanza Previn creates a rapt strings’ expanse as a backcloth 
                  for a rich toned cor anglais solo and you appreciate the soft 
                  but dense, emotive response of the strings and its later flowering 
                  forth after their rich reprise of the solo. Curiously the development 
                  (tr. 4 5:58), though marked animato, seems a touch slower. 
                  It does, however, have striking dramatic focus, not least in 
                  the tingling tremolo on violins and violas shepherding the graphic 
                  horn and trumpet versions of the solo which are more clearly 
                  focussed than the 1971 solos. Here too the recapitulation comes 
                  as a relief, is a little faster as marked and with that freedom 
                  also comes a sense of fulfilment. The 1971 account isn’t as 
                  rich in tone but is more elegiac in manner. It’s less cultivated 
                  but seems more spontaneous than the Curtis, in particular owing 
                  to the seamless way one strand leads to another and the climax 
                  has a more blazing intensity.
                
Previn’s Curtis 
                  Passacaglia finale has a smooth flow in both the opening ground 
                  bass and violins’ counter melody (tr. 5 0:12) yet also a strong 
                  element of eagerness and joyous celebration. It’s really rather 
                  fast for the moderato marking of the opening and strains, 
                  via relished syncopation from 1:15, towards the eruption of 
                  the allegro second section (1:58) with brass turned full 
                  on and strings’ rhythms skipping. The third section (3:49) begins 
                  with a very reflective clarinet solo, the first of a number 
                  in the woodwind, scrupulously distinctive in VW’s somewhat gawky 
                  phrasing. The coda (6:29) brings back the symphony’s opening 
                  theme, welcomed with some breadth, before the strings reflect 
                  in relaxed, tender and hymn like fashion on the finale’s counter 
                  melody. Interestingly the quite fast closing counter melody 
                  works better than at the opening. The 1971 slower Passacaglia 
                  has a more natural flow from the outset, a kind of inevitability 
                  about it, contrasted by a stimulatingly brisk allegro 
                  and more measured third section before a more heroic return 
                  of the opening theme and closing serene counter melody. The 
                  trombones and bass trombone vivid capping of the horns and trumpets’ 
                  ff chord at the end of the second section and the bass 
                  trombone solo in the third section are more emphatically realized 
                  in 1971 than 1995.
                
The final work on 
                  this Previn Curtis CD features Previn as composer as well as 
                  conductor. The cover illustration may lead you to think Reflections 
                  (tr. 6) is going to be like The Swan of Tuonela but it’s 
                  neither as romantic nor as bleak. It’s a modern fantasia in 
                  that the initial melodic idea is constantly modified and extended. 
                  It begins with cor anglais alone in an angular yet soaring melody, 
                  shortly joined by a reflecting cello, which is to say its melody 
                  is as firm and clear as the original yet with a surprising intensity 
                  at the close, before other wind instruments get involved and 
                  the strings provide a backdrop and occasional comment, also 
                  sometimes of unexpected intensity. The work aspires to the rhapsodic 
                  but in an astringent environment. You could term this ‘the modern 
                  idiom’ and it includes some Brittenesque fanfare writing for 
                  trumpet at 3:51 which itself is a reflection of the cello solo. 
                  At 5:04 a livelier, jazzier, scherzo like section is started 
                  by side drum and cello which the cor anglais becalms with something 
                  more melodic and alluring, akin to a folksong outpouring. This 
                  the cello at first restlessly brushes aside but from 8:11 the 
                  two ideas are combined then interwoven. At 8:52, when the cor 
                  anglais introduces a new, more pleading idea the cello now reflects 
                  this. At 9:35 the strings find a passionate hinterland to the 
                  original melody and from 10:13 the cello an eloquent, wistful 
                  commentary which leads to a brief and moving unique playing 
                  in strict accord by cello and cor anglais from 10:28. The work 
                  ends with just the start of the cor anglais solo opening, like 
                  posing a question, but reminding you of the source of all the 
                  subsequent ideas. It sustains the listener’s interest as an 
                  examination of melodic motifs and moods, thoughtful and thought 
                  provoking and not otherwise currently available on CD in the 
                  UK than in this committed performance.
                
To sum up, these 
                  accounts, never released in the UK by EMI and only now available 
                  on Arkiv CD, are spirited and often attractive with a fine sense 
                  of direction. Even if the Fifth symphony doesn’t quite have 
                  the sheer conviction of Previn’s 1971 recording, the Curtis 
                  players show themselves to be a student orchestra of prolific 
                  talent. Their strings sound more like the Philadelphia than 
                  any other orchestra I’ve heard, unsurprisingly given that nearly 
                  half the Philadelphia’s players are Curtis Institute graduates.
                
              
Michael Greenhalgh