Both composers had a pretty rough start to their careers and 
        these two piano concertos had their respective roles to play. Tchaikovsky’s 
        concerto, when he played it through at the Moscow Conservatoire (where, 
        ironically, he was a professor of composition) to the Director, Nikolai 
        Rubinstein, who was reputedly a fine pianist himself. He dismissed the 
        concerto as ‘worthless and completely unplayable, any corrections would 
        be pointless’. Hans von Bülow, on the other hand, received it gratefully 
        (unchanged) as ‘spellbinding in every respect’ and was happy to be its 
        dedicatee. The German master pianist performed it for the first time on 
        25 October 1875, and in due course a rather abashed Rubinstein took it 
        up (poor Tchaikovsky seemed to make a point of such misalliances, another 
        was Auer’s rejection of his violin concerto, then taken up triumphantly 
        by Adolph Brodsky in 1876, and then shamefacedly by Auer).  
        
        
        
Rachmaninov had a bad start when Glazunov made a drunken 
          mess of conducting the young man’s first symphony in 1897, which cost 
          him a three-year period of depression and artistic inertia. It was a 
          crude form of psychiatry and hypnosis which restored his self-confidence 
          and provided the impetus to produce his second piano concerto at the 
          beginning of the century. Its first performance took place on 27 October 
          1901 with the composer as soloist. Juxtaposing both concertos here underscores 
          their similar starts (if dissimilar moods), introductions with block 
          chords on the piano which do not recur in the concerto. Unlike the Prelude 
          in C sharp minor, which he was always pressed to include in his recitals 
          if only as an encore, he loved playing this work throughout his life. 
          One thinks of the appearance in 1938, just five years before his death, 
          at London’s Royal Albert Hall to honour Sir Henry Wood (a good friend) 
          in his Jubilee Year. 
        
        
Two war-horses they may be but this pair of piano concertos 
          never fail to please, unless badly played, which happily on this disc 
          they are not, neither are they poorly accompanied. Alexei Sultanov has 
          a wonderfully impressive technique, injecting both sensitivity and tenderness 
          where called for, full-blooded tone into the handfuls of chords at dramatic 
          or impassioned moments, and gifted with an amazing facility in bringing 
          out every semiquaver in the many cascades of runs. This is an excellently 
          balanced disc, if a little lacking in depth of resonance and bloom in 
          Snape, but one in which Maxim Shostakovich draws warmth and colour from 
          the LSO’s sound in all departments. He manages to bring out details 
          not often heard in the woodwinds in the Tchaikovsky concerto, reminding 
          us constantly of this supreme composer of ballet scores. Indeed there 
          are moments in the Andantino of the Tchaikovsky and in the Adagio of 
          the Rachmaninov in which he manages to transform the orchestra’s sound 
          to that of a Russian one (in particular the various solos); no mean 
          achievement. The strength of these performances is their freshness and 
          immediacy. One gets the impression that this collaboration was all happy 
          music-making.
        
        
Christopher Fifield