Other Links
Editorial Board
- UK Editors
- Roger Jones and John Quinn
Editors for The Americas - Bruce Hodges and Jonathan Spencer Jones
European Editors - Bettina Mara and Jens F Laurson
Consulting Editor - Bill Kenny
Assistant Webmaster -Stan Metzger
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD UK CONCERT REVIEW
Janáček, Dvořak:
Wihan String Quartet. Wigmore Hall, London, 6.3.2011 (CC)
Janáček:
String Quartet No. 1, “Kreutzer Sonata”
Dvořak:
String Quartet No. 11 in C, Op. 66
Last
June, the Wihan Quartet gave a memorable recital (see
http://www.musicweb-international.com/sandh/2010/Jan-Jun10/wihan0506.htm),
coupling Mendelssohn and Brahms (and encoring Paganini). This concert certainly
delivered the same high standard, although - arguably - the actually
compositional standard was lowered a tad by the Dvořak.
First,
though, Janáček’s impassioned first quartet (the so-called “Kreutzer Sonata”).
The Wihan Quartet has a timbral warmth characteristic of its geographic origins
(the Czech Republic). Here that warmth acted against it, robbing Janáček’s
opening gesture of vital angst. Indeed, the overall gentleness of the Wihan’s
reading was surprising. All players tackled the composer’s virtuoso demands
with confidence and seeming ease, though, and the ghostly effects of the second
movement (Con moto) were well rendered. Yet, again, there was a softening, this
time of the overtly nightmarish elements in the music. Strangely, interruptions
to the musical flow were more marked in the third movement. While this was a
technically accomplished and timbrally appealing reading, it failed to reflect
the sheer rawness of emotion contained in the score.
The
Dvořak was written in 1881 (when the composer was forty years old). It is not
his greatest quartet in that it is not structurally taut. And yet it is on the
way to greatness in the sheer inspiration of themes. There is no sunny
C-majorness to the first movement, with its long, aching first violin lines.
The Wihan Quartet captured the sense of ongoing flow excellently, and by
keeping the intensity high through more relaxed portions they maintained a
sense of directionality through what is actually quite a diffuse movement.
The
finest movement was the Poco Adagio e molto cantabile. Here full of
spontaneity. Leos Cepický’s violin sang sweetly; dynamics by the whole quartet
were shaded down to a whisper. If the Scherzo provided delights, the finale
could possibly have been more abandoned in parts. Nevertheless, it was good to
hear this piece in concert. The ten-minute
encore was more Dvořak: a rapt account of the slow movement to the Quartet,
Op. 74, shot through with nostalgia.
Colin Clarke