Gustav Noé’s art-house revenge thriller, Irreversible,
is as searing a film as one is likely to legally see (especially in censored
Britain). Taking European cinema one step closer to the films of Billy Tang
(especially his indescribably powerful Red to Kill) and Katsuya Matsumara’s
All Night Long series it is a 90 minute assault on the senses that does,
and should, leave one consciously thinking about it long after it has ended.
Uncritically, it has been dismissed as nothing more than this director’s attempt
to shock his audience with graphic violence that serves no or little purpose,
a film which according to Alexander Walker of the Evening Standard ‘contributes
to the terminal state of individual helplessness’; critically, it should perhaps
be viewed as a twenty-first-century attempt to cinematograph credulous events
in a Jacobean, even Senecan, theatrical style. Irreversible owes as much
to plays such as Shakespeare’s Titus Andronicus and Seneca’s Thyestes
as it does to any exploitative film of the last 30 years. Moreover, place, in
a dramatic sense, is as important to this film as the events themselves – whether
it be in the cavernous setting of the Rectum Club, where the ‘revenge’ is exacted,
or in the subterranean, dimly-lit subway where the act that precipitates the
‘revenge’ is carried out.
The revenge is for the rape of Alex (an astonishing performance
by Monica Bellucci) and its nine minutes are harrowing to watch. Perhaps because
Noé doesn’t sensationalise it – and especially doesn’t eroticise it –
it has escaped the scythe of the censors. Filmed head on, and at almost ground
level, it has an unmistakable edge to it as we are forced to look at events
face on. But it is Noé’s persistent association of sex and violence as
somehow inter-connected that gives the scene its power – her face is pummelled
into the concrete afterwards, less as an after thought, more as an orgasmic
climax to the rape itself. Similarly, it is at the S & M Rectum Club – with
its scenes of fisting, whether implied or actual, or where the search for pain
is seen as an extension of sex – that the brutal murder by Pierre (Albert Dupontel)
takes place. An arm is wrenched upwards and literally cracks apart, and a head
is smashed to pulp with the base of a fire extinguisher until it caves in and
becomes nothing more than a sea of flesh and bone – almost dripping across the
floor like melted, blood-red candle wax. It is enormously powerful - and would
be to most people inured to the 70’s or 80’s screen violence of Sam Peckinpah’s
Straw Dogs, Ruggiero Deodata’s House on the Edge of the Park or
Wes Craven’s Last House on the Left, films which Noé’s is, if
not a grandchild of, then certainly a godson of. But Noé adds something
even more disturbing to his revenge scene: unable to distinguish between the
reality of what they are seeing, and the onanistic sexual fantasies that have
brought them there in the first place, a series of onlookers see the played
out murder for what it isn’t: sex. It is this confusion of values which places
Noé’s film above the norm.
Noé’s way with Irreversible, as its title suggests,
is to film the action in reverse (even going so far as to opening the film with
the closing credits). It is not a new concept – Christopher Nolan having done
it only a couple of years ago with Memento. Thus, it starts in darkness
and bleakness and ends in light and happiness. It starts with sex being brutalised
and ends with sex being almost sanitised. It starts with the gloom and finality
of Mahler’s last completed symphony and ends with the triumph and optimism of
Beethoven’s Seventh.
Despite the excellent, crisp quality of Studio Canal’s DVD
transfer the film opens up more vividly on the big screen, despite its obvious
claustrophobia which might have made it more suitable to the limitations of
television (it is also remarkable how little of the film is actually filmed
in the open). The visual problem with the DVD is down to Noé’s technique
which tends to film sequences in a fractious, kaleidoscopic way. Whirling cameras,
placing images sideways or upside down, and often against a grainy darkness
where the tenebrous overwhelms the brightness, give us glimpses of action rather
than the whole of it. He lingers on images only momentarily, or, as in the case
of the rape, lingers on them for what seems like an eternity deviating very
little from his aim of making the action macroscopic with minimal panoramic
effect.
Where this film differs from its equally controversial predecessors
is in its use of music. Whereas Craven & Co used contemporary pop music
to add to the triteness of the unfolding horror of their films, Noé engaged
the services of Thomas Bangalter.
One half of the group Daft Punk, and one of the most gifted
house producers around today, his soundtrack owes more to standard horror fare
than one might have imagined. Keeping to the context of the film it is a pounding,
scabrous composition which begins with slicing bass drum beats and follows with
an echoing snare beat. Using some of Mahler’s most nihilistic music – the close
of the Ninth symphony – overlapped with humming electronic effects, it brings
the film closer in its dark, opening minutes to an apocalyptic nightmare than
might otherwise have been the case. More Berg than Brangalter one might be tempted
to write; more Wozzeck than Irreversible.
The pumping track for Rectum uses whaling sirens over and over
again – both as an impending warning for the unfolding events and as a working
image for the lack of emotiveness which infects the club like a disease. They
drown out, then reappear, their intensity gathering momentum until the face-smashing
reaches its gritty climax. Ominous organ chords, or a distant harpsichord, are
applied as much as the submerging of a voice under twenty feet of water. Atonal
guitar chords and a persistent electronic buzz are merged. It is by no means
a classic score, and certainly not thematic in any way, but it does its job
more than adequately.
The DVD includes a perceptive commentary from the director
– even if his brutal, somewhat clinical methodology might leave some gasping.
There is also a 16-page booklet which includes two pages of press quotes. Unsurprisingly,
not one British newspaper is quoted. The only disadvantage of this edition of
the film is that it is in French only with no subtitles at all. Whilst that
is not necessarily a problem for viewing the film itself (which could so easily
have been composed without any dialogue, and at times passes through bleeding
chunks without any) it obviously is if you want to hear the director’s commentary
and your French is limited. Yet, this is an uncut version of the film – and
that is unlikely to be the case when it is released in the UK – so for completists
it is an essential purchase.
Irreversible is a film which has no middle ground. You will
either like it or you won’t. But, whatever your feelings it will leave an impression
and a lasting one.
Marc Bridle
Editor's note: Irreversible was, perhaps surprisingly,
passed uncut by the BBFC for UK cinema showing. As of today - 10 March 2003
- no decision has been taken regarding any possible DVD / video version. To
check for any future decision visit http://www.bbfc.co.uk/