Alexander SCRIABIN (1872-1915)
  Symphony No. 3 in C minor, Le Divin Poème, Op. 43 (1902-1904) [44:22]
  Poème de l’extase, Op. 54 (Symphony No. 4) (1905-1908) [20:35]
  London Symphony Orchestra/Valery Gergiev
  rec. live, March and April 2014, Barbican, London, UK
  Reviewed as a 24/96 download from 
		Hyperion
  Pdf booklet included
  LSO LIVE LSO0771 SACD [64:58]
	     Watching Gergiev conduct – those fluttering 
          fingers in particular - I always wonder how orchestras can be certain 
          of his beat. That sense of mild apprehension applies to his recordings 
          too; either he storms to the top of the charts – his recent LSO 
          Live Rachmaninov 
          Second Symphony is now among the finest in the catalogue – 
          or he delivers a reading that’s unforgivably perverse. His Rachmaninov 
          Third belongs firmly in the latter category. Which left me wondering 
          where he would go with this new Scriabin series, surely one of his last 
          as principal conductor of the LSO. More important, perhaps, is how his 
          readings of these two symphonies compare with those of Vasily Petrenko 
          and the Oslo Philharmonic (review).
          
          As regular readers will know I regard Riccardo Muti’s classic 
          Scriabin, with the Philadelphia Orchestra in incandescent form, as my 
          go-to box for these works (Warner 
          and Brilliant Classics). Leif Segerstam and the Royal Stockholm Philharmonic 
          (BIS) 
          have their moments too, but if the first instalment of Mikhail Pletnev’s 
          Pentatone 
          cycle with the Russian National Orchestra is anything to go by both 
          sets could soon be swept aside. As for Petrenko his tenure in Oslo has 
          only just begun, which may be one reason why his Scriabin 3 and 4 lack 
          conviction and character.
          
          Scriabin needs firm advocacy and a judicious hand if his sprawling works 
          aren't to buckle under the weight of their ambition and scale. Muti, 
          a natural when it comes to big dramatic gestures, gets the balance right 
          most of the time; not only that, he knows just how this music should 
          sound. It helps that nis Memorial Hall recordings are so rich 
          and dynamic. Alas, such attributes are harder to come by at the Barbican, 
          which is notorious for its ungrateful acoustic. That's certainly the 
          case on record, although I can think of a number of fine LSO Live releases 
          that buck this trend. The question is, which way will this one go? 
          
          Gergiev's Third starts poetically enough, but after the Lento – 
          Luttes it becomes rather prosaic - routine, even. I'm all too familiar 
          with this highly variable maestro's work, but I didn't expect him to 
          modulate to the key of humdrum so soon. Yes, there are some lovely, 
          exotic sounds in Voluptés, but there’s also a creeping 
          sense of coagulation that both Muti and Segerstam manage to avoid. Gergiev 
          seems just too detached here, which is fatal in such immersive repertoire. 
          That same air of disconnection pervades Jeu divin, although 
          Gergiev does spur his players on to a pretty exciting close. As if this 
          weren't dispiriting enough the recording is dry and the presentation 
          seems rather flat. I imagine the multichannel mix would address the 
          latter issue.
          
          What an inauspicious start; and I'm afraid it doesn’t get any 
          better. Gergiev’s Poème de l’extase - crude and 
          disjunctive - is everything this lambent music shouldn't be. At least 
          the solo trumpet at the start has presence and a hint of headiness – 
          Petrenko’s Poème is particularly disappointing in this 
          regard - but otherwise the performance remains earthbound. The sound 
          isn't very ingratiating either. Like Petrenko - but unlike Muti, Segerstam 
          and Pletnev - Gergiev seems to have chosen the optional harmonium at 
          the end; I say 'seems' because you'd be hard-pressed to tell it was 
          there at all.
          
          It's all so frustrating. Perhaps Petrenko and Gergiev have tried to 
          avoid a well-upholstered approach here, but in the process they’ve 
          knocked the stuffing out of these sumptuous symphonies. At this point 
          Muti is still sans pareil in the Third and Pletnev is the new 
          benchmark in the Fourth. In fact the latter performance, coupled with 
          an equally fine account of the First, is likely to be one of my Recordings 
          of the Year.
          
          Gergiev’s Scriabin fails to enchant or excite; the featureless 
          recording doesn’t help.
          
          Dan Morgan
          twitter.com/mahlerei