Balakirev, despite being known as as a tireless 
          campaigner on behalf of others including the ‘mighty handful’ 
          (Rimsky-Korsakov, Mussorgsky, Borodin and Cui) is much less well known 
          today than those whose music advocated. In part this could be due to 
          the hugely long periods he took to complete many of his works despite 
          being very fast at writing others. It could also be due to the fact 
          that he went out of fashion while he was still working. Many of his 
          pieces disappeared into oblivion almost as soon as they were completed. 
          
            
          Now is surely an opportune moment for a serious reassessment. The times 
          we live in seem to be open to music from any and every period with perhaps 
          the greatest amount of choice and availability ever. In any event what 
          is not in doubt is the music itself which is ravishingly beautiful and 
          quintessentially Russian. 
            
          The notes written for the present disc by pianist Nicholas Walker reveal 
          the background to the three sonatas. They are played here in the reverse 
          order to the one in which they were written. The 
Sonata in B flat 
          minor (1905) dates from five years before Balakirev’s death 
          at the age of 73. It is a distillation of all three and its long gestation 
          is explained by the fact that Balakirev was always striving to write 
          a work that told the entire history of Russia. Even as a very young 
          man he envisaged writing a symphony that did just that. While others 
          were influenced by the idea and used elements in their own compositions 
          Balakirev never actually wrote it. For someone who prided himself on 
          being an amateur musician in the sense that he had studied mathematics 
          not music, worked as a railway clerk and only ever received ten piano 
          lessons in his life, his music is astonishingly accomplished. 
            
          The 1905 sonata begins with an attempt at describing ancient Rus, the 
          very cradle of Russia, full of deep forests and wide open steppes. The 
          second movement is a mazurka - a common feature in all three sonatas. 
          It is here completely rewritten but with the essential core remaining 
          giving a kind of continuity to Balakirev’s main ideas on such 
          a sonata. It is a rich evocation of the Russian dance. There is something 
          reminiscent here of his most well-known work 
Islamey which though 
          inspired by points further East nevertheless has elements in common. 
          The 
Intermezzo is quite hauntingly beautiful with deliciously 
          long flowing lines that make a brief reappearance in the 
Finale. 
          The latter is in the form of an allusion to a spirited Ukrainian gopak 
          in which it easy to imagine the shooting out of legs while the dancer 
          bobs up and down from his crouched position with arms folded. This wildly 
          energetic movement subsides and finishes on a calm and reflective note. 
          As Mr Walker points out, this seems to suggest the endless nature of 
          Russia as it stretches further and further east. This Sonata is a monumental 
          work of striking originality. It places huge demands on any performer 
          who takes it on. Walker, a great champion of Balakirev, makes a fabulous 
          job of it. It is to be hoped that, along with other recent recordings, 
          this will help it to gain its rightful place as one of the great piano 
          sonatas. 
            
          It is interesting going back in time to hear the other two sonatas. 
          Each contains the germs of the final version. It is notable how much 
          Balakirev achieved at such an early age for they were written when he 
          was only 19 and 18 respectively. Amazingly the earliest and longest 
          and regrettably unfinished sonata, his op. 3, here receives its world 
          première recording 158 years after its composition and 103 years 
          after Balakirev’s death. Balakirev clearly got a lot right with 
          that first attempt and both of those early versions are well worth listening 
          to. Together with the 1905 final version they make this disc an extremely 
          valuable resource and one that will repay repeated hearings. 
            
          All the playing is exemplary and Nicholas Walker whose championing of 
          Balakirev led to his organising a Balakirev festival on the occasion 
          of the 100
th anniversary of composer’s death in 2010 
          has added another powerful voice to the demands for a reappraisal of 
          this neglected composer. 
            
          Wonderfully brilliant and virtuosic though 
Islamey is Balakirev 
          should be known for far more than that since he was not a ‘one 
          trick pony’ by any means. While his legacy lives on through his 
          huge influence on other composers and in his contribution to the establishment 
          of a Russian school of music free from the influence of German repertoire 
          his own relatively small corpus of work is both significant and richly 
          rewarding. This disc helps confirm that. 
            
          
Steve Arloff  
          
          See also review by 
Byzantion