This recording has already been extensively reviewed 
          in various incarnations by my colleagues Roberts 
Farr 
          and 
McKechnie. 
          I do not propose to spend too much time revisiting its many merits and 
          a few demerits. These will already be familiar to most readers. They 
          are, in any case, admirably delineated by those gentlemen, my predecessors, 
          to whom I refer you for a more detailed critique of the performance. 
          I demur very little regarding their opinions but have just one or two 
          observations of my own to qualify their views. 
            
          By far the most important point of this my review therefore is to emphasise, 
          as I do every time I report back on the latest Pristine re-mastering, 
          just how superior it is to previous issues - even excellent ones by 
          such as Mark Obert-Thorn for Naxos Historical. It is like hearing this 
          recording for the first time, so full and vivid is Andrew Rose’s 
          sound-engineering. Instead of the crashing seaside-brass-band chords 
          with which 
EMI’s 
          issue commences the “Sinfonietta”, we hear a tutti from 
          what is identifiably the fine orchestra of La Scala, Milan and then, 
          especially, its euphonious horns. There is virtually no hiss, plenty 
          of airy ambience around the voices and instruments and above all, a 
          new depth now that the lower frequencies have been enhanced; the unpleasant 
          metallic quality always previously present is gone. The result is that 
          even the rather gritty, windy and unsteady bass of Rossi-Lemeni - for 
          me always the weakest link in the cast - sounds better than I have ever 
          heard it before. He remains too tremulous in “Cinta di fiori” 
          but this may be construed as being the result of deep emotion. By and 
          large he emerges as the singer who would be the most grateful to Pristine 
          for its re-mastering were he able to hear it.  
          Panerai, too, divides opinion by virtue of the slight tremolo in his 
          rapid vibrato and some occasional unsteadiness and inaudibility. He 
          was only twenty-eight at the time of recording and some nervousness 
          is understandable. Otherwise, the musicality and intensity of his singing 
          are admirable. Comparison with predecessors and successors such as Cappuccilli 
          and Battistini reveals some deficiencies in his legato but the latter, 
          for all his vocal supremacy, takes unpardonable liberties by modern 
          standards. Cappuccilli, despite his long-breathed eloquence, is coarser 
          of tone. Neither suggests much desperation in “Ah per sempre” 
          but that most grateful of cantilena arias has always presented a conundrum 
          to a baritone of how to sing it with the smooth assurance the melody 
          requires while simultaneously conveying the emotional import of the 
          thwarted lover. Alongside Panerai’s rhythmic delicacy, Battistini’s 
          agogic distortions would sound almost comical were it not for the nobility 
          of his voice. Best of all in that lovely music was Giuseppe de Luca, 
          his baritone perfectly even and effortless; Panerai is meanwhile very 
          acceptable, especially as this opera gives Riccardo so much music. 
            
          Callas’s virtues are well known: superb diction, immaculate phrasing, 
          top Ds and E flats in place, magical downward portamenti especially 
          over the interval of a fifth, lapidary coloratura runs through the octave 
          and a pathos and vulnerability of utterance that remain unrivalled. 
          The improved sound simply highlights her vocal prowess. 
            
          Di Stefano is nobody’s ideal exponent of 
bel canto; there 
          are strains and he has none of Pavarotti’s grace, but the D flat 
          is there. He delivers a virile, impassioned Arturo, full of ardour and 
          animation. 
            
          Serafin exhibits empathy with both the idiom of the music and the needs 
          of his singers. His rubato is beautifully judged and he is capable of 
          whipping up excitement over a long span of music. In particular, the 
          arresting opening of the opera is revealed in Serafin’s hands 
          to be masterly, the martial expectation segueing elegantly into the 
          offstage hymn of praise. Everything is so elegantly paced. 
            
          The traditional cuts - 33 in all amounting to 32 minutes less than Bonynge’s 
          full score recording - are distressing. The truncation of the ending 
          is especially frustrating but there’s nothing we or Pristine can 
          do about that and what remains is stunning.   
          
          
Ralph Moore