A single CD which couples Prokofiev’s two greatest symphonies 
                  - or should we say ‘his two great symphonies’, which 
                  is not quite the same thing - is bound to assume a strong position 
                  in the catalogue. With good sound and excellent orchestral playing 
                  this new recording ticks all the right boxes. The question is 
                  therefore: how strong should those ticks be? 
                    
                  Prokofiev described his Fifth Symphony as ‘A symphony 
                  about the spirit of man, the culmination of the larger part 
                  of my creative life’. What he meant by that is that it 
                  represents a major statement, both because it was written towards 
                  the victorious conclusion of the Great Patriotic War, and because 
                  he was returning to composing a symphony for the first time 
                  in fifteen years. In a sense the point can extend further still 
                  to the Classical Symphony of 1917, which was the previous occasion 
                  that he composed a symphony from scratch, without leaning on 
                  an existing work for the theatre to form the basis. 
                    
                  Symphonic logic is therefore a priority, and Oramo scores strongly 
                  here, with eloquently evolving lines and an overview which gets 
                  the main ideas into their respective positions in the developing 
                  drama. The many instrumental solos are handled with aplomb and 
                  the recorded balance never lets anyone down. If the most powerful 
                  moments, such as the end of the first movement and the big climax 
                  in the slow movement, don’t pack as much of a weighty 
                  punch as for example in Karajan’s classic Berlin Philharmonic 
                  recording (DG Originals 463613-2) it’s probably because 
                  of Oramo’s overview of the symphony. Nor do these climaxes 
                  lack impact. 
                    
                  The same thing might be said of the rhythmic vivacity and wit 
                  which prevails so much in movements two and four. It is always 
                  present, but symphonic line seems the greater priority. 
                    
                  Of these two performances, it is the Sixth which makes the stronger 
                  impression; and perhaps that is true of the compositions themselves. 
                  If Prokofiev’s magnificent Fifth Symphony is a work which 
                  relates to the victorious outcome of the 'Great Patriotic War' 
                  - in his own words, 'a symphony about the spirit of man' - the 
                  Symphony No. 6 is an altogether more complex affair. It is every 
                  inch the equal of its illustrious predecessor. 
                    
                  The first performance, under the direction of Yevgeny Mravinsky, 
                  was given at the opening concert of the Leningrad Philharmonic 
                  Orchestra's 1947 season. Prokofiev had completed the Symphony 
                  in February of that year, though his sketches stretched back 
                  over many years. Evidently the music meant a great deal to him; 
                  and it is true that few of his other compositions can match 
                  the intensity of expression and clarity of construction which 
                  are combined here. The 'personal' thoughts of great artists 
                  were not Stalin's preferred mode of expression, and the Sixth 
                  was the main reason why Prokofiev, along with other major figures, 
                  was attacked for 'formalist tendencies' at the notorious Congress 
                  of Soviet Composers in 1948. 
                    
                  Oramo and the Finnish Radio Symphony Orchestra project this 
                  intensity of vision from the very first bar. Again the conductor’s 
                  grasp of structure and line is never in question, and in this 
                  emotionally complex work this brings abundant rewards. The music 
                  is at once dark and powerful, and it is deeply characteristic. 
                  Towards the end the music turns towards a tragedy, and it ends 
                  in abrupt, fateful collapse. No wonder it brought political 
                  problems in its wake. 
                    
                  This is a very different response to war, as Prokofiev explained 
                  to his biographer Israel Nestyev: 'Now we are rejoicing in our 
                  great victory, but each of us has wounds which can never be 
                  healed. One has lost those dear to him, another has lost his 
                  health. These things must not be forgotten.' These powerful 
                  feelings are conveyed in this excellent new recording.  
                  
                  
                  Terry Barfoot  
                  
                  Masterwork Index: Prokofiev 
                  symphonies