We owe almost all Glass’s symphonies to the keen, indeed 
                  cajoling enthusiasm of Dennis Russell Davies. The Ninth, quite 
                  a marker in any symphonist’s work list, was commissioned 
                  by a gaggle of great and good organisations - the Bruckner Orchestra, 
                  Linz (who premiered it), Carnegie Hall, and the Los Angeles 
                  Philharmonic Association. Its first performance was given at 
                  the Brucknerhaus in Linz at the very end of 2011 and its US 
                  premiere followed very soon after, at the start of 2012. 
                    
                  It’s in three movements and lasts three quarters of an 
                  hour. It starts in an ominous D minor cast in a linear metric 
                  ABA form. Glass being Glass, it’s not ‘developmental’, 
                  though figures recur throughout either suspended rhetorically, 
                  or actively driving. The ear is drawn to the percussive-led 
                  drama of some of the writing, so too by the rich sonorities 
                  he generates. There are episodes that take a few listens to 
                  assimilate - I’m thinking of the rather weird Moroccan 
                  or North African-sounding paragraphs in the first movement. 
                  The ‘camel train across the desert’ aspect sounds 
                  facetious the first time one hears it, but actually it accrues 
                  depth, on repeated hearing, by virtue of its cinematic eventfulness. 
                  
                    
                  The second movement reveals something that tends to be overlooked 
                  in Glassian discussion; the occasional loveliness of his writing, 
                  and its unabashed richness. Here, too, we hear that pervasive 
                  ambulatory and questing spirit that animates so much of his 
                  music, developing force in blocks - high winds and low brass 
                  combine, chugging away, buttressed by dynamic percussion and 
                  rhythm. I won’t be alone in hearing Ravel cross-pollinated 
                  by film music in this movement. 
                    
                  Much of the finale is torrid, inaugurated by teeming brass, 
                  and the spirit of convulsion is uppermost. Towards the very 
                  end baleful final chords announce the irresolvable and unknowable 
                  nature of things; there is a sense of striving, but toward what? 
                  To what end? 
                    
                  It’s surely to Glass’s great credit that a Symphony 
                  that many will dismiss as just another product of his shtick 
                  can leave one with a terraced series of questions such as these. 
                  No easy answers, then. No triumphant final chord. Instead, we 
                  have a strong and purposeful work that grows more memorable 
                  on repeated listening. 
                    
                  Jonathan Woolf