Given the quality of what is otherwise available, this two 
                  CD set, for all that it’s conveniently, economically and 
                  attractively packaged, is not really competitive, either in 
                  terms of recorded sound or performance. There is nothing especially 
                  wrong with the playing here, but place it alongside the drive 
                  and verve of the starry Ax-Stern-Laredo-Ma quartet or Murray 
                  Perahia with three members of the Amadeus Quartet in Op.25, 
                  both on Sony, and you will immediately hear the difference. 
                  
                    
                  I have admired Derek Han’s pianism in his complete set 
                  of Mozart Piano Concertos on this Brilliant label. Indeed he 
                  is the most expressive and animated of the musicians in this 
                  ad hoc ensemble. However, the recorded sound here, surprisingly 
                  drab for such a recent digital engineering, robs his playing 
                  of nuance, in that he is set too far back in a slightly boomy 
                  acoustic which takes the edge off instrumental tone, dulls the 
                  impact of his liquid runs and robs ensemble of crispness. Thus 
                  the playing of both Ax and Perahia emerges as more trenchant. 
                  The piano is not the only instrument to suffer from the mushy 
                  sound: shortly into the first movement of the C minor quartet 
                  there is a spooky little pizzicato rising octave phrase for 
                  the violin which is virtually inaudible and thus goes for nothing. 
                  
                    
                  Apart from the sound issue there is also the question of the 
                  appropriate Brahmsian style. I must say straightaway that it 
                  is the two more grim and tempestuous passages which suffer from 
                  a lack of attack whereas the sunnier, more lyrical A major work 
                  or the Andante of No.3 are far more successful. Both Op.25 and 
                  Op.60 are full of strife and struggle, especially in their tragic 
                  opening movements. The insistent four semi-quaver motif running 
                  through No. 1 and constantly mutating through various related 
                  keys is highly dramatic but the Han quartet seems unduly restrained 
                  and at times even lethargic. They are again much happier, for 
                  example in the flowing Andante of the second movement of Op.26. 
                  Incidentally, no performers I know seem to take much notice 
                  of Brahms’ broad tempo markings: an Allegro is as likely 
                  to be Andante, as is the Poco Adagio of this movement; it’s 
                  more a question of capturing the requisite mood.
                  
                  There is also a tendency here to ignore the importance of dynamics; 
                  too much is played at mezzo forte, although I would say that 
                  this is much less apparent in Nos. 2 and 3. Indeed, the Han 
                  quartet is more animated and able to assimilate the volatile 
                  contrasts of No.2 than in the more famous G minor quartet. However, 
                  there is a greater, richer vibrancy and sonority to the Ax and 
                  Perahia Quartets when the lower strings are playing in unison 
                  with the piano and they are clearly more “animato” 
                  in their willingness to apply rubato and shape their phrasing 
                  freely. They bring out more emphatically the Schubertian admixture 
                  of melodic insouciance and tragic intensity. The “Zingarese” 
                  last movement of Op.25 is almost tentative whereas we need the 
                  wild abandon of the kind Ax and co give us in those syncopations. 
                  Han is fleet but verging on dull. This issue of differentiation 
                  is germane almost throughout the first two works so I won’t 
                  belabour the point. 
                    
                  The music itself is so wonderful that even a slightly dutiful 
                  performance affords the listener much pleasure. It is a distillation 
                  of everything which characterises Brahms’s restless virility; 
                  no wonder Schoenberg felt moved to orchestrate Op.25 as the 
                  composer’s “Fifth Symphony”. It remains full 
                  of surprises: I cannot be the first to hear a more than faint 
                  echo of Elijah’s prayer “Lord God of Abraham” 
                  in the gentle descending melody on the piano, then taken up 
                  by the strings, at 2:16 in the Allegro of Op.60. 
                    
                  As these players seem to have come together solely for the purposes 
                  of this recording and are not identified by any ensemble name, 
                  this, in addition to the muddy sound, might explain the lack 
                  of élan, some untidiness in bow strokes and a tendency 
                  for the music to fail to “sing”. 
                    
                  The liner-notes are interesting and informative but there is 
                  no biographical information about the artists. 
                    
                  This is by no means a poor set but the principle of the best 
                  being the enemy of the good applies here.   
                  
                  Ralph Moore