Recently, I reviewed 
                  a recording by Peter Seymour and the Yorkshire Baroque Soloists 
                  of Bach’s St. John Passion. This recording of the B 
                  Minor Mass was made not long afterwards and in the same venue. 
                  I was decidedly uncomfortable with the speeds that Seymour adopted 
                  for most of the chorales in that St John performance. There 
                  are some challenging speeds in this present performance too 
                  but, for the most part, I am less disconcerted this time around.
                   
                  For the St. John Seymour used a small choir of just 
                  twenty singers (5/5/4/6). For the Mass he utilises a much larger 
                  choir of fifty-seven (18/18/10/11). Purists might well argue 
                  that this means it’s not a ‘period’ performance, despite the 
                  presence of period instruments. They may well be right but I 
                  find Seymour’s decisions as to the scale of the performance 
                  and the forces employed pretty convincing.
                   
                  The very opening of the work may startle you. Seymour is brisk 
                  and business-like in the way he dispatches the first four bars 
                  – too much so for my taste – but the Bärenreiter vocal score 
                  may imply a justification for this since there is no tempo marking 
                  over those first bars but bar 5 is marked Largo, suggesting, 
                  perhaps, a slower speed. Thereafter the first chorus, Kyrie 
                  I, settles down to a perfectly conventional speed. I’m afraid, 
                  however, that I simply can’t agree with the speed adopted for 
                  Kyrie II. Granted, it’s merely marked Alla breve but 
                  I calculate Seymour’s speed to be about 96 beats to the minute 
                  and he whips through the music in just 2:21. By contrast, Sir 
                  John Eliot Gardiner, no sluggard, brings the movement in at 
                  a much more realistic 3:30 in his 1985 DG Archiv recording. 
                  Thereafter, however, I’m pretty comfortable with the speeds 
                  throughout the performance.
                   
                  The Gloria is joyful and buoyant. Some may think that ‘Gratias 
                  agimus tibi’ is on the swift side but I like the freshness and 
                  clarity. Of course, the same music recurs at the very end of 
                  the work at ‘Dona nobis pacem’ and, rightly, Seymour adopts 
                  the same tempo. For some reason I feel the tempo is marginally 
                  less successful at that point in the score but I’d far rather 
                  have a speed that’s fleet than any suggestion of grandiosity. 
                  Reverting to the Gloria, the ‘Qui tollis’ also benefits from 
                  the clarity of approach. Perhaps a slightly slower speed would 
                  have allowed the flute line to twine more sinuously around the 
                  vocal parts but the performance is convincing. The lithe, jubilant 
                  ‘Cum Sancto Spiritu’ is delightful; the fugue is excellent, 
                  the singing - and playing – crisp and each line clearly audible. 
                  In the Credo I like the way Seymour takes the ‘Et incarnatus’ 
                  and ‘Crucifixus’ choruses: the pacing is sensible and his singers 
                  have just the right amount of tonal weight without any hint 
                  of the sanctimonious. At the end of the Credo the ‘Et expecto’ 
                  is exciting and festive, complete with silvery trumpets. The 
                  Sanctus is quite fleet and some may feel that some grandeur 
                  has been sacrificed. On the other hand, the pacing emphasises 
                  the joyful nature of the words and music and I like it. In all 
                  this Seymour is supported excellently by his choir. The chorus 
                  is flexible and I like very much the fresh, clean tone they 
                  produce with just the right amount of body in the bass line. 
                  At all times the singing is clear and the choral contribution 
                  is an asset in this performance.
                   
                  What of the soloists? There’s a good, well matched duet from 
                  Bethany Seymour and Sally Bruce-Payne in the ‘Christe eleison’ 
                  and, singing by herself, Bethany Seymour makes a very pleasing 
                  impression in the highly decorated ‘Laudamus te’. I’m unsure 
                  how the tenor solos are divided but whichever tenor sings in 
                  the ‘Domine Deus, Rex caelestis’ duet has too big a voice for 
                  the music in my view and overdoes the vibrato. He doesn’t blend 
                  well with Miss Seymour. The soloist in the Benedictus sounds 
                  much more suited to the music. He makes a good job of this demanding 
                  solo and I like the plangency in his tone. There’s also a super 
                  flute obbligato in this movement.
                   
                  I’ve already mentioned Sally Bruce-Payne. She gives a very fine 
                  account of ‘Qui sedes ad dexteram Patris’, singing her line 
                  with clean tone and excellent articulation. And in the even 
                  more crucial Agnus Dei solo her singing is excellent. The stand-out 
                  soloist, however, is Peter Harvey. He’s commanding in ‘Quoniam 
                  tu solus sanctus’ and in the ‘Et in Spiritum Sanctum’ he spins 
                  a splendid line, deploying a splendid legato.
                   
                  The recorded sound is good and the clearly produced booklet 
                  includes a scholarly yet readable essay by Peter Seymour. This 
                  performance of the B minor Mass is not, I think, a first choice 
                  in what is a highly competitive field but it’s fresh and enjoyable 
                  and I’m glad to have heard it.
                   
                  John Quinn