This is the third in Tahra’s Youra Guller series. The others 
                  were TAH630 (now deleted by the company) and TAH650. This new 
                  disc replicates important repertoire. 650 had a performance 
                  of the Beethoven Concerto in G with Ernest Ansermet from 15 
                  January 1958, whilst 630 had a broadcast of Chopin’s F minor 
                  Concerto with, once again, the Suisse Romande but this time 
                  conducted by Edmond Appia, from 10 June 1959.
                  
                  My reviews of the two can be read here: Beethoven 
                  and Chopin.
                   
                  It may be helpful just to repeat what I wrote about Guller for 
                  this unfamiliar with her. Her biography is told at some length 
                  in Tahra’s notes for the earlier discs, and a remarkable, compelling 
                  story it is.  She was born in 1895 in Marseilles. Her father 
                  was Russian and her mother Romanian and at twelve she entered 
                  the Paris Conservatoire where she studied under Isidore Philipp. 
                  Clara Haskil, who was in Cortot’s class, was a contemporary. 
                  After graduating she made the acquaintance of Milhaud and performed 
                  his music, and that of the other members of Les Six, 
                  as well as specialising in Chopin and toured widely. She fled 
                  Paris in 1941 and returned to Marseilles where she met Haskil 
                  and her sister Jeanne. Guller seems to have been responsible 
                  for aiding Clara Haskil’s escape, though as Guller was herself 
                  a Jew she was in particular danger. She was ill for some 
                  time – living in Shanghai it’s said or maybe Bali for eight 
                  years - before resuming her career in 1955. She returned to 
                  London in that year and travelled to New York in 1971 to play 
                  at a recital in Carnegie Hall. Martha Argerich admired her and 
                  Nimbus recorded her in the studios in 1975. Perhaps typically, 
                  given the shrouded and sometimes fugitive nature of her life, 
                  the exact date of her death seems to be in some confusion; 1980 
                  or 1981, and the location Geneva, Paris or London, though surely 
                  this can be resolved easily enough.
                   
                  Her performances with Inghelbrecht seem to have generated rather 
                  more heat, and greater phrasal intensity, than in the case of 
                  the two other collaborators. The actual expressive quotient 
                  of her playing isn’t necessarily radically altered but there 
                  is, I sense, a rather deeper response in the case of the Beethoven, 
                  where her first movement cadenza ranges from feathery in terms 
                  of articulation to increasingly bold. The slow movement reprises 
                  her equable, non-philosophic responses, once again wholly unsentimental, 
                  and never aligning itself with the kind of stasis and introspection, 
                  of deep-held depths uttered by such as, say, Emil Gilels. For 
                  those for whom he remains nonpareil, Guller will seem somewhat 
                  matter of fact. She was in her early sixties when she was taped 
                  in the work and although she’s not finger perfect and sometimes 
                  she subdues the bass line too much, the playing is direct, straightforward 
                  and unaffected. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that in both 
                  the Beethoven and the Chopin her performances with Inghelbrecht 
                  are a good two minutes quicker than the traversals with Ansermet 
                  and Appia.
                   
                  Guller is said to have suffered a crisis of confidence in the 
                  post-war years and surely the punishing nature of her life took 
                  its toll on her technique. I sense her compromised technique 
                  is at the root of the problems in the F minor, which once again 
                  seems to discomfort her from time to time. Again, too, the left 
                  hand accompanying figures don’t provide as much rhythmic spring 
                  as they might — the recording is a little muddy in the bass 
                  too, which doesn’t help. But it’s a rather more involving performance 
                  than the Appia and better conducted, and better performed by 
                  the orchestra (the Suisse Romande had a particularly bad day). 
                  Again the slow movement is the highlight – warmer in tone, and 
                  more naturally phrased, if again still a little aloof.
                   
                  These are improvements musically on the previous instalments 
                  in this series. Guller divides opinion rather radically, but 
                  this brace of concertos certainly shows her in more communicative 
                  form than before.
                   
                  Jonathan Woolf