This perceptively programmed disc was recorded nearly two decades 
                  ago, and the performances stand up very well. All three works 
                  were composed within a year of each other. It wasn’t then common 
                  to seek out Ervin Schulhoff’s quartet, a work that only gains 
                  in (relative) popularity and stature, but the Brandis, whom 
                  one might assume would be too ‘whipped cream’ for it, prove 
                  one wrong at every turn. This is a more than respectable reading; 
                  it is committed and astutely played. The Brandis is predictably 
                  tonally warmer than, say, the eponymous Schulhoff Quartet [VMS 
                  138] but they take care not to overdo the vibrato and attacks 
                  are brisk, sharply edged and spontaneous sounding. They certainly 
                  catch the eerie quality inherent in the music, not least in 
                  the malinconia grotesca that is the second movement Allegretto. 
                  The Slovak folkloric drones are well pointed in the third movement, 
                  as are the off-beat taps on the bodies of the fiddles to simulate 
                  percussion. I suppose it’s the finale that will divide opinion. 
                  The Brandis takes it slowly, an Adagio that is fully molto 
                  sostenuto, as marked, though many will prefer the wirier, 
                  more bracing tempo solution of the Schulhoff. 
                    
                  Weill’s 1923 Quartet is equally well played, the warmly textured 
                  con molta espressione of the opening movement ideally 
                  realised, without ever allowing the music’s tension to sag. 
                  The droll little march that functions as the Scherzo is finely 
                  etched and there’s a powerful control of counterpoint in the 
                  finale with its Schreker influences, and an especially rapt 
                  close. Hindemith’s Op.22 Quartet has been revised from No.3 
                  to No.4 in the canon but there’s often confusion, as here. The 
                  five movements are compact, and impressively characterised, 
                  not least the abrupt changes of mood that signal Hindemith’s 
                  mastery of the genre. The abrasive, martial second movement 
                  even prefigures similar movements in Shostakovich. Not unlike 
                  the Schulhoff, there are certainly other approaches. The old 
                  Hollywood Quartet recording certainly took a rather different 
                  series of tempo and expressive decisions — which means, on the 
                  whole, faster in the fast movements and slower in the slow ones. 
                  Theirs is a valid approach, and coupled with their tonal warmth, 
                  means that their recording, which is on Testament, will continue 
                  to win admirers. 
                    
                  The Brandis’s survey though is a wholly recommendable one, alert, 
                  and poised, and stylistically apt. The recording is a touch 
                  billowy for my tastes, but there’s a great deal to like about 
                  these performances. 
                    
                  Jonathan Woolf