Review of the other CDs in the Schmidt Naxos series: 
                  
                  Symphony 
                  1
                  Symphony 
                  2
                  Symphony 
                  3 
                  
                  And so we come to the final instalment of Vasily Sinaisky’s 
                  complete recordings of the Franz Schmidt Symphonies. It’s a 
                  set which, despite Sinaisky being faithful to the scores, has 
                  failed to take flight. The works do not emerge in their best 
                  light, the 2nd and 3rd 
                  Symphonies being underachieved in Sinaisky’s interpretations. 
                  
                  
                  The 4th is not just Schmidt’s greatest 
                  symphonic achievement, it’s one of the greatest Symphonies of 
                  the 20th century. In his 3rd 
                  Symphony, Schmidt gave a suggested playing time of some 
                  50 minutes, which Sinaisky achieves, but this proves to be too 
                  slow. Most performances take about 44 minutes and at this duration 
                  the music really flows. For the 4th 
                  he suggests 46 minutes - any slower and the music fails to work. 
                  Most will have learnt the work from Zubin Mehta’s 1971 Decca 
                  recording of the work with the Vienna Philharmonic (still available 
                  on 430 007–2, coupled with Schönberg’s 1st 
                  Chamber Symphony with members of the LA Philharmonic and 
                  with Mahler 2 on Decca 440 615-2). Mehta was slightly too slow 
                  and thus the finely structured proportions of the music were 
                  wrong. The best recording, and thus the touchstone for all recorded 
                  performances of this work, is Rudolf Moralt’s 1955 recording 
                  with the Vienna Symphony Orchestra. The Moralt is now available 
                  on Naxos 
                  9.80262 (download only) and this is a must for everyone 
                  interested in this work for, as an interpretation, it is unsurpassed. 
                  In 1994, BBC Radio 3 broadcast a performance of the work with 
                  the BBC Philharmonic under Adrian Leaper which was just about 
                  perfect, but I don’t believe that it’s ever been repeated. I 
                  wish that the BBC would think the Leaper worthy of putting on 
                  CD, even a free one given away with the BBC Music Magazine would 
                  be gratefully received. 
                  
                  So what of Sinaisky? This is certainly the best interpretation 
                  of the four Symphonies in this series, but it still leaves me 
                  wanting more. The orchestral playing is excellent, and even 
                  though Sinaisky understands the music I don’t feel any cumulative 
                  growth throughout the piece, so that by the time the opening 
                  idea returns it’s just the opening idea returning, we don’t 
                  feel as if we’ve been on a big, life-changing, journey. It’s 
                  all so nonchalant, bland even, and it’s the lack of drama and 
                  passion which gives this impression. The prime example of this 
                  is the moment, at the end of the scherzo section, where the 
                  music explodes into screaming mayhem – just before the horns, 
                  in harmony, start to rebuild the world and bring about a musical 
                  recapitulation – except that here it doesn’t. There’s a storm 
                  in a teacup but that’s about it, nothing apocryphal, no devastation. 
                  Life goes on without worries. Likewise the lyrical moments, 
                  which really soar, are here firmly rooted to the ground. Ultimately 
                  the whole performance fails to elevate because the reading is 
                  too literal, and nowhere does it leave me breathless with awe, 
                  excitement and amazement. Barbirolli would have done this music 
                  proud had he ever had the chance to conduct it, for this period 
                  was right up his street – think of his Strauss, Mahler and Bruckner. 
                  
                  
                  Better one goes to the Moralt recording on Naxos or, if a more 
                  modern recording is required, Yakov Kreizberg with the Netherlands 
                  Philharmonic give a fine performance. Kreizberg’s interpretation 
                  is borne out of live performances in Europe and America. I have 
                  a recording of a live performance he directed with the Cincinnati 
                  Symphony, in 2003, which is stunning – so he has a deeper understanding, 
                  not to mention a real working knowledge, of the work than most 
                  (Pentatone FTC 5186 015 – coupled with three excerpts from Schmidt’s 
                  early opera Notre Dame). 
                  
                  The Variations on a Hussar’s Song receives a similar 
                  literal, and earthbound, performance. I simply cannot be bothered 
                  with it. Franz Welser–Möst’s performance with the London Philharmonic, 
                  coupled with Schmidt’s 4th Symphony, is unavailable at present, 
                  is worth having, if you can find it (EMI Classics originally 
                  7243 5 55516 25 and more recently 94635 56922). If you are looking 
                  for a truly idiomatic performance then turn to the Vienna Philharmonic 
                  under Knappertsbusch, from 1957. That recording is coupled with 
                  a 1959 Salzburg Festival performance of Schmidt’s great oratorio 
                  Das Buch mit Sieben Siegeln under Mitropoulos, with Anton 
                  Dermota, Fritz Wunderlich and Hilde Güden, amongst others (Andromeda 
                  ANDRCD9067). 
                  
                  As you can see, there are better versions of both works elsewhere 
                  and those interpretations will repay repeated hearings and tell 
                  you much more about the music than these. 
                  
                  Bob Briggs