Liszt students enjoy considerable cachet. Liszt students who left 
                behind tangible examples of their playing enjoy a renown that 
                adds to the Liszt debate. Arthur Friedheim was one such, but he 
                had the dual distinction of having also been taught by Anton Rubinstein 
                with whom he studied at the age of fourteen; Friedheim was born 
                of German parents in St Petersburg in 1859. His move to Liszt 
                in Weimar led to a breach with Rubinstein, who called Liszt ‘the 
                devil’. Eventually Friedheim became Liszt’s secretary and indeed 
                his amanuensis, remaining with the composer for eight years until 
                Liszt’s death. Travel and endless concerts followed and also a 
                rather peripatetic life; London, Munich, Toronto and New York, 
                where he died, were also places where he lived for a time. The 
                First War saw him ostracised in America, and working as a pianist 
                in a movie theatre. He died in 1932. 
                  
                Friedheim recorded on disc and roll. But he only made ten sides 
                on 78 discs, a rather paltry return for so eminent a musician. 
                One of his disc recordings coincides with a roll; the second Hungarian 
                Rhapsody, though the disc, which was made for Emerson in 1917, 
                is truncated and essentially halved in length. Nevertheless despite 
                the rather cloudy Emerson sound — not a prestigious label, though 
                it did record some prestigious musicians — we can discern one 
                thing. The statuesque and dull roll performance is worlds away 
                from the passionate ardour and splendour of the disc. The usual 
                prescriptive comments about roll performances must apply. No one 
                could take the Chopin Prelude performances seriously as examples 
                of Friedheim’s playing. The F sharp minor sounds plain weird, 
                and the companion Prelude in G has clearly been edited to such 
                an extent that it’s hard to tell how many voices are teeming there. 
                
                  
                Some things do survive somewhat intact. Gottschalk’s 
The Banjo 
                is sprightly, bright, crisp and amusing. Elements of his Lisztian 
                playing can be inferred but they must be considered provisional 
                only. The roll recording of 
La Campanella can be compared 
                with a 78 he made of the same piece. The roll’s endemic brightness 
                and generic tonal response contrast with the subtle colouration 
                preserved in the grooves of the 1913 Columbia. But there is also 
                a further proviso. Both the Dal Segno and the Nimbus Grand Piano 
                series have transferred some (but not all) of the same rolls. 
                The results, mechanically speaking, vary enormously. The Nimbus 
                version of 
La Campanella is, in my view, a far more realistic 
                affair than the lumpen and rather bizarre sounding Dal Segno. 
                But there are huge tempo variations in the two transfers of other 
                pieces, as a look at the headings will indicate. 
                  
                So, whatever one wishes to infer from the playing of this important 
                Liszt student, the evidence is improbably preserved by these two 
                discs. It’s best to seek out Friedheim’s disc records — they’re 
                on Symposium 1343, coupled with the recordings of another Liszt 
                student, José Vianna da Motta. 
                  
                
Jonathan Woolf