Hamilton Harty conducted two important Schubert recordings at 
                  the end of the 1920s. Schubert was in the air at the time, as 
                  1928 marked the centenary of his death, an event that occasioned 
                  a flurry of recordings. In January of that year, quick off the 
                  mark, Columbia recorded him with his Hallé Orchestra in the 
                  Ninth Symphony in what detective work suggests was Fyvie Hall 
                  in London. Most of the selected takes were the third, though 
                  there are three first takes in the fourteen issued sides; no 
                  second takes at all, which is unusual. 
                  
                  This distinguished, personalised reading is fascinating to hear. 
                  At the time the Hallé was regularly upstaging London orchestras, 
                  even the LSO, and it was during this time that the visits of 
                  the New York Philharmonic-Symphony under Toscanini, Berlin Philharmonic 
                  under Furtwängler and the Hallé itself, spurred the formation 
                  first of the BBC Symphony and then Beecham’s LPO. What one hears 
                  from the Hallé is, first, the very unusual tone and phrasing 
                  of the horn statements, and the wind voice leading. Harty encourages 
                  a rather unblended approach in contradistinction to his contemporary 
                  Beecham whose performances were notable for the metrical freedom 
                  he allowed his wind players but within a precisely calibrated 
                  blend when chording. Harty also offers much more looseness in 
                  this respect and many more portamentos in the string section. 
                  His Schubert is punchy and invigorating, Beecham’s more emollient 
                  and sidling in approach. The music making is forward-moving 
                  and exciting, though I sense at one side join (imperceptible 
                  in this transfer but if you have the 78 you know where it is) 
                  Harty fractionally loses the tempo established toward the end 
                  of the previous side – it’s in the opening movement; see if 
                  you agree. 
                  
                  Listening to this performance is fascinating on a number of 
                  levels, not least the individual timbres of each section. The 
                  winds are pretty much vibrato-free, as they illustrate in a 
                  strong, commanding slow movement, which Harty swings into with 
                  dancing Ländler panache; the cellos too don’t illustrate 
                  much vibrato but do slide voraciously. Harty is quite salty 
                  in the Scherzo, and big-boned and characterful in the finale. 
                  
                  
                  When a transfer is as disappointing as the Hallé’s own label 
                  was in the Cassadó adaptation of the Arpeggione sonata, 
                  one worries that other companies will shy off [Hallé Tradition 
                  CD HLT8003]. The market is not so wide for such material that 
                  it can easily bear competing end-products, and that’s one danger 
                  in botched transfers. Fortunately this company hasn’t been put 
                  off; on the contrary it’s stepped in with its own fine work, 
                  courtesy of Mark Obert-Thorn. The Cassadó arrangement (or if 
                  you prefer orchestral beefing up) of the Arpeggione Sonata 
                  is, if not rare in its original 78 guise, at least relatively 
                  uncommon. It’s an ingenious piece of work and shows the soloist 
                  in a fine light; the cellist’s much later version with the Bamberg 
                  orchestra under Perlea is on a good Cassadó Vox Box. 
                  
                  It’s always good to welcome Harty material. He has cachet among 
                  collectors, so let me ask the question: when are we going to 
                  have a good transfer of his collaboration with Sammons in the 
                  Bruch concerto, and with Catterall in Mozart? 
                  
                  Jonathan Woolf