Most readers will have a few records, quite possibly a lot, 
                  conducted by Eugen Jochum. But I wonder how many even know that 
                  his elder brother Georg Ludwig (1909-1970) was also a conductor. 
                  Like his brother Eugen, Georg Ludwig was noted for his Bruckner. 
                  Some time ago a composite cycle of historical Bruckner symphony 
                  recordings was issued in which the conducting was shared between 
                  the two brothers. However, while Eugen’s career took him to 
                  the four corners of the earth, Georg Ludwig remained essentially 
                  a local German artist. 
                  
                  If you belong to the fraternity that thinks the only problem 
                  with classical symphonies, quartets and sonatas is all those 
                  bloody repeats, GLJ will be your man. The first movement of 
                  “La Reine” is one of those where Haydn marks both parts to be 
                  repeated. Not every conductor would give you the second-half 
                  repeat even today, but GLJ does without the first as well. In 
                  the second movement, every single section except the last is 
                  supposed to be played twice, but GLJ sails serenely through 
                  as if no one had ever taught him what those two dots before 
                  a double bar mean. He also interprets Haydn’s marking of Allegretto 
                  in two as Andante in four, so I daresay a modern Historically 
                  Informed Performance with all repeats would not actually last 
                  much longer than GLJ’s 5:37. GLJ’s chosen tempo, though, is 
                  very gracefully brought off, not at all heavy. The Menuetto 
                  gets its repeats – this seems to have been an unwritten rule 
                  even then – and the tiny repeat at the beginning of the finale 
                  is played. 
                  
                  In other respects, too, this Haydn performance is of its day. 
                  The old Breitkopf parts are unquestioningly used. Or at least, 
                  since I don’t actually have an old Breitkopf score, I am charitably 
                  assuming that the discrepancies between what is printed in my 
                  score edited by Robbins Landon and what is played – quite a 
                  lot of phrasing but some actual notes too – are due to the edition 
                  used rather than alterations by GLJ himself. In truth the Robbins 
                  Landon edition came out in 1950, so GLJ had no excuse. But then, 
                  Beecham had no excuse either and people tend to accept his use 
                  of discredited Haydn editions as part of the game. 
                  
                  But there is a positive side, too. I remarked recently, à 
                  propos performances of the first two Beethoven concertos 
                  by Felicia Blumenthal, conducted by Robert Wagner, that this 
                  was music-making from an age before “originality” raised its 
                  head, when there was a shared perception of tempi and general 
                  style. Conductor and orchestra are simply settling down to enjoy 
                  the music as they know it, as they believe it to be and as they 
                  have always believed it to be. In the present finale, “settling 
                  down” may be the operative word since their interpretation of 
                  Haydn’s “Presto” is, to put it kindly, comfortable. But even 
                  here there is a sense of good-natured enjoyment. 
                  
                  In the case of Beethoven this unquestioning acceptance of the 
                  received interpretation, when combined with a genuine enjoyment 
                  of the music, can still reveal important facets of many-faceted 
                  music. HIP has brought losses as well as gains. In the case 
                  of Haydn the gains have been greater, the losses smaller, and 
                  the received interpretation of fifty years ago is likely to 
                  sound slightly wrong today. Yet it remains enjoyable music-making, 
                  rhythmically alive and springy, with some dynamic shading. The 
                  players’ confidence in what they are doing can be infectious. 
                  So in the end this still has something to tell us. 
                  
                  GLJ is a bit more generous over repeats in Schubert. No. 3, 
                  in particular, is quite impressive because the conductor does 
                  not underplay the music. The main section of the first movement 
                  has a good lilt and considerable strength. No special charm 
                  in second subject territory but quite affectionately handled 
                  nevertheless. The only drawback is that the finale, while not 
                  exactly slow, lacks the fizz its tarantella rhythms – and Presto 
                  vivace marking – surely call for. 
                  
                  If the fifth is a little less successful, this reflects the 
                  fact that it is more difficult to bring off. The first movement 
                  is purposeful enough at the outset but in second subject territory 
                  GLJ apparently just beats time steadily and lets the music find 
                  its own solution. It sounds a bit perfunctory. The second movement 
                  needs more arching phrasing if a tempo closer to adagio than 
                  “Andante con moto” is not to drag and the steady-as-she-goes 
                  finale seems to confirm GLJ’s reluctance to make a finale really 
                  “zip”. 
                  
                  Forgotten Records is a French label that has dedicated itself 
                  to reviving LPs that have sunk beneath the horizon. Their transfers 
                  are straightforward and honest. They don’t remove surface hiss 
                  – not that there’s all that much here – but they seem to have 
                  access to excellent copies and equipment that shows them at 
                  their best. The recordings emerge as good mono for their period. 
                  The back cover gives full track and recording information, also 
                  a list of internet links where you can find more information, 
                  though in the case of GLJ it just amounts to a few lines on 
                  Wikipedia. The German Wikipedia entry is fuller if you can read 
                  it. The “booklet” is just a pretty cover with nothing in it. 
                  I don’t think Forgotten Records have found buried treasure in 
                  this case and I certainly didn’t get the impression that the 
                  Jochum brothers’ reputations should be reversed. But it’s quite 
                  an enjoyable peep into the past. 
                
Christopher Howell