Born in Rome, Garofalo attended the Vatican college where he 
                  studied organ and composition. He moved to America in 1910 where 
                  he became music director and organist at the Immaculate Conception 
                  Church in Boston, Massachusetts, but he didn’t stay there 
                  for long. He returned to Italy where, later in life, he taught, 
                  one of his pupils being Ennio Morricone. Both Nikisch and Toscanini 
                  expressed an interest in Garofalo’s work, but neither 
                  performed any. However, after hearing this disk I can understand 
                  why; there’s simply no substance to the music. 
                    
                  The Violin Concerto was written after Garofalo heard, 
                  and had been impressed with, the very young Yehudi Menuhin. 
                  In three movements, the first is a too long, rambling, piece 
                  of almost a quarter of an hour, the music constantly reminding 
                  me of Karl Goldmark’s marvellous A minor Concerto, 
                  but it’s highly unlikely that Garofalo knew that piece. 
                  The big problem with this Concerto is that it doesn’t 
                  have any real personality and the thematic material is poor 
                  and unmemorable. 
                    
                  The Symphony isn’t much better. Starting with an 
                  overblown (no pun intended) brass phrase, to which the composer 
                  adds an organ at the end, this is a kind of poor man’s 
                  version of the I AM motive from Scriabin’s 3rdSymphony. 
                  The music then becomes a café waltz , but without the 
                  charm. Garofalo tries very hard to add some stress to the music 
                  but just when you think it’s going to become dramatic 
                  the insipid waltz returns, and goes on and on, never quite reaching 
                  whatever deep feelings the composer has in mind for his allegro. 
                  The slow movement starts well but descends into over-scored 
                  mush. Then a plangent oboe tries to create some peace but a 
                  congested woodwind passage enters the scene and a poor climax 
                  is built. The scherzo tried hard to be Mendelssohnian 
                  but has far too heavy a touch. It’s so laboured. The finale 
                  strives to create a “big finish” but the piling 
                  on of orchestral forces simply isn’t enough. As sequence 
                  follows sequence, one feels that this is Max Reger gone dreadfully 
                  wrong. 
                    
                  I don’t care about this music. I cannot engage with it. 
                  I cannot find any redeeming features which would make me ever 
                  want to hear this music again. The melodic material is very 
                  poor, and totally unmemorable, the orchestration verges on the 
                  banal and amateurish and the overall feeling of the music is 
                  of a person who is interested in composition and has a very 
                  slight talent. Naxos is to be thanked for so many of its recordings 
                  and reissues but it has done too much and not everything is 
                  of worth. This is one of their failures. One to be missed at 
                  all costs. 
                    
                  Bob Briggs
                  
                  see also reviews by Rob 
                  Barnett and Nick Barnard