Ensemble is the key to the Smetana Trio’s art: the balance 
                  between the players, the finely graded hierarchies of contrapuntal 
                  prominence, and perhaps most importantly of all, the ability 
                  of pianist Jitka Čechová to blend in with the sustained tone 
                  of her colleagues. The result is a finely integrated whole. 
                  More famous names, especially violinists like Itzhak Perlman 
                  or Janine Jansen, take greater liberties with their solos in 
                  the Mendelssohn, treating their companions as accompanists, 
                  but not here. It is to the credit of both works that they fair 
                  well in both kinds of interpretation. 
                
The coupling is fascinating as it highlights a number of thematic 
                  links between the works: did Mendelssohn know the Schubert? 
                  Were all German and Austrian composers using these thematic 
                  devices at the time? Or perhaps the similarity in the performance 
                  style is what draws the two works together. Drawing a dividing 
                  line between Schubert the Classical master and Mendelssohn the 
                  Romantic upstart is an almost impossible task, although Schubert’s 
                  obsessive thematic structuring goes some way towards locating 
                  his music in the ‘long 18th century’. 
                
For all that though, the Smetana Trio treat him as a Romantic, 
                  just as much as they do Mendelssohn. Both composers are given 
                  real heart-on-sleeve treatment, although the overt expression 
                  tends to be through wide ranging dynamics rather than through 
                  excessive rubato. The warm recorded sound helps to create this 
                  inviting Romantic atmosphere, and the piano in particular is 
                  given a warm aural profile. Remarkably, this does not adversely 
                  affect the clarity of the piano sound. On the contrary, the 
                  warmth of the lower register really articulates the bass lines, 
                  and creates a rounded sound for the piano left hand that is 
                  nevertheless distinct from the sound of the cello.
                  
                  Given the artistic unity of this small ensemble, it seems uncharitable 
                  to pick it apart in terms of individual performers. Even so, 
                  Jan 
                  Páleníček, the cellist of the group deserves a special 
                  mention. Each of his solos is something really special, and 
                  his ability to blend into the tutti textures without compromising 
                  the unique identity of his tone is rare indeed. Take, for example, 
                  the Andante con moto second movement of the Schubert. His solo 
                  at the beginning is perfectly judged, digging into the lower 
                  register to find a little more resonance when required and subtly 
                  colouring everything with an only just perceptible vibrato. 
                  Those colours continue into the following tuttis, and function 
                  just as well as bass lines and counterpoints.
                  
                  I’m less impressed with the performance of violinist Jana Vonášková-Nováková. 
                  She has a narrower tone, which is all right for many of the 
                  solos, but can be a little grating in the top register in louder 
                  tuttis. In some of these, in the Finale of the Mendelssohn, 
                  for example, I found myself contemplating how the performance 
                  would be improved by the involvement of a really big name violinist. 
                  
                  
                  The answer is that they would probably have a sweeter, rounder 
                  tone at the top and have to strain less to carry the line over 
                  the ensemble, small as it is. But the price would be a reduction 
                  in the coherency of the sound, a less equitable interaction 
                  between the players. That would be a real shame, because these 
                  piano trios are almost archetypal chamber music, and the greatest 
                  strength of this recording is that they are presented as exactly 
                  that. They are passionate and expressive readings, but intimacy 
                  and tight ensemble are the key features, just as they should 
                  be.
                  
                  Gavin Dixon