Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD INTERNATIONAL OPERA REVIEW
Vivaldi, La Fida Ninfa : (The
Faithful Nymph) – concert version, Miguel Delibes Cultural Centre,
Valladolid, 26. 4. 2008 (JMI)
The present fashion for baroque opera has allowed many forgotten
works to be dusted off and offered to today’s public all around
Europe and further afield, normally in concert performances, as
here. Musicians like William Christie, René Jacobs, Alan Curtis,
and here, Jean Christophe Spinosi have made whole careers out of
this. There are so many candidates from the entire oeuvre of
Baroque opera, that while there seems to be continued public
interest, there will be no shortage of new revivals.
For two or three years, Spinosi has had great success with
Vivaldi’s La Griselda, so it looks as if he has decided to
continue with the same composer’s output, since he has put himself
to the trouble of bringing the Fida Ninfa to light, whose
modern premiere was five years ago at the Ambronay festival.
In its original existence, this opera was the subject of a special
marketing campaign by Vivaldi himself. Vivaldi secured a first
performance in Verona in 1732 to mark the inauguration of the
later much destroyed and rebuilt Teatro Filarmonico. The Verona
Academy, who commissioned the first performance, included in its
number Marchese Scipione Maffei, who had written the libretto, and
he was unsurprisingly the prime mover in engaging Vivaldi. (I
should say that my opera programme confusingly and surely
incorrectly attributed the libretto to Luigi Giusti, author of the
libretto to Vivaldi’s Montezuma.)
Unfortunately, Maffei’s libretto is prolix, boring and frankly
absurd, full of shepherds, nymphs, woods and mountains, but
decidedly short on events. Moreover, the finale bears no relation
to the preceding three hours, including the appearance of several
classical gods for no better reason than Maffei’s own love of
mythology.
But Vivaldi managed to produce music, at least, that has moments
of the highest quality. The opera contains no less than 26 arias,
three sinfonias and various vocal ensembles. It is still an uneven
work, but one may single out a few highlights – Narete’s aria (he
is the nymphs’ father), ‘Deh, ti piega,’ is a gem, as is Osmino’s
countertenor ‘Qual serpe tortuosa,’ and the two arias of Morasto
are very fine, ‘Destin avaro’ for its bravura and ‘Dite ohime,’
for the originality of its guitar accompaniment.
Spinosi has recently found Vivaldi fertile ground for the
expression of his own personality and intensity, and this was
certainly true of this production. At the same time, there was no
loss of delicacy and there were moments of the greatest intimacy.
He made an excellent case for this form of opera, and,
incidentally, for how it points towards Mozart. The Ensemble
Matheus was also able to show it is one of the best baroque
outfits around at the moment.
The vocal cast for this production has hardly any weaknesses. The
three female roles are especially demanding, with at least six
arias each. The supposed protagonist, the faithful nymph herself,
Licori, was sung by the French singer Anna Maria Panzanella; she
was perhaps the weakest of the main singers, with moments both of
harsh tone and imprecision. Licori’s sister, the other nymph
Elpina, was sung by the Italian mezzo Barbara di Castri, who also
took the role of Juno in the finale. She had a big voice,
convincing, if of no outstanding tonal beauty. Sandrine Piau and
Sara Mingardo take these roles in some performances. For me,
there was no doubt that the prize among the female singers went to
the Argentinian Veronica Cangemi (Morasto). She sang with great
sensitivity, beauty of tone and agility, and undoubtedly provided
some of the best moments of the whole evening.
Jose Manuel Zapata was a fine and agile Narete, with excellent
diction in the recitatives and plenty of taste in his set-piece
aria, ‘Deh, ti piega.’ The expressivity and emotion of his singing
came as a pleasant surprise to me; I could see him as Nemorino, or
Arturo in I Puritani. Osmino, whose story in this opera is
especially incomprehensible, long and boring, was sung by the
French counter-tenor Philippe Jarousky, whose voice and quality
are beyond criticism. I think of Jarousky as having one of the
most beautiful voices in his field, and would like to see him in
more demanding roles. It has been said that the original singer
who played Osmino must have been the best-paid of the company,
since he has relatively little to sing, but what he does sing
includes two major arias. Lorenzo Regazzo was a great success as
Oralto, the pirate, giving the role real life and interest. It was
the best I have heard him sing, and suggested he might be very
well suited to similar low baritone roles in this repertoire.
The auditorium had plenty of spaces, but this was still a much
more substantial audience than there has been on many previous
occasions. So it looks as if the public is more warmly embracing
the attractive programme that Vallodolid now offers.
There have been many occasions (especially in Madrid) where cuts
of up to a third of the music have been made to the opera,
sometimes shortly before the performance date, simply because of
timetabling problems but on this occasion, even after three and a
half hours, the audience not only clapped and cheered the whole
cast, but also showed no signs of stirring. Finally, Spinosi, gave
them a hint, turning to them and saying with a wink, the two
words; ‘Da Capo!’ and indeed, why not…..
José M Irurzun
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page