Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD RECITAL AND CELEBRITY LECTURE REPORT
Daniel
Barenboim and the Beethoven Piano Sonata cycle: Second concert and ‘Artist
as Leader’ discussion, Royal Festival Hall,
London
3.3.2008 (JPr)
This recital was the second in Daniel Barenboim’s Beethoven
Piano Sonata cycle and it was followed by his participation in the
first of the ‘Artist as Leader’ talks associated with this cycle
of eight recitals ending on 17 February. It was supposed to be the
second talk but the previous night Barenboim had suffered
food-poisoning and the event had been cancelled. Some discreet
coughing into a handkerchief during the recital suggested that he
was not as well as might be hoped, though as the consummate artist
that he is, neither his playing nor his later self-deprecating
introduction to the role he plays in world affairs showed any sign
of further problems.
Daniel Barenboim claimed that he has ‘No role other than what I
feel and think. In two years it will be 60 years since my first
public concert and it is a wonderful feeling that people will
still come to hear me and maybe they will care about the things I
care about.’
This is his third Beethoven Sonata cycle. The first was in 1967,
the second in 1977 and he played his first one in
Israel when he
was only 17. For those not attending all the concerts - such as
myself - Barenboim noted in the programme that ‘Each (recital)
has a late sonata, where there is one, a major early sonata and a
middle one’ indicating that he would have preferred a
chronological order ‘but the programmes are not really well
balanced when you do that.’
Piano Sonata No.2 in A, Op.2 No.2 from 1795 is one of three
dedicated to Haydn who inspired Beethoven to move from
Bonn to Vienna.
No.2 is notable for the way we see Beethoven already treating his
musical materials more as motifs than themes. The first movement
opens with arpeggios and scalar figures that seem to be a series
of questions being to be answered. The expressive
Largo
with an accompaniment like a pizzicato double bass, sounded like a
ticking clock or a heart beat and not for the last time one felt
here that this is a song without words. The Scherzo was
more playful before an energetic Rondo Finale where again
- and not for the last time - Barenboim’s impeccable dexterity,
made the music sound as if there were more than two hands playing.
Piano Sonata No.17 in D minor, Op.31 No.2 (Tempest) has an
uncommon key and a stormy opening followed by repeated slow and
fast music of quieter lulls and more squalls. The name is not
Beethoven’s but was a result of him saying -when asked what this
work was about - ‘Just read Shakespeare's The Tempest’.
During the playing I felt a quiet in the Royal Festival Hall (that
was filled to capacity) that I had not experienced before. It was
only during this movement that I became apparent how Barenboim had
to counter the difficulties posed by having short arms in the
demanding overhand stretches to the extremes of the keyboard.
Following the volatile opening, the Adagio in a major key
(B flat) is sombre yet eloquently hypnotic. In the Finale a
sense of improvisation returns and after a period of calm almost
unrelieved semiquavers and an insistent four-note theme -
considered by some to have been inspired by a horseman galloping
past Beethoven's window - a certain turbulence returns before a
quiet conclusion.
The improvisatory feeling in much of what Beethoven wrote in these
sonatas, was mirrored by the fact that Barenboim was surrounded by
an extra 150 members of the audience on the platform. This feeling
was equally clear from his performance manner : he was happy to
begin the concert's second half before everyone had completely
quietened down from applauding him as he walked on.
He began with the undoubtedly joyful Piano Sonata No.10, Op.14
No.2. In the Allegro Beethoven plays tricks with rhythm and
metre and the work features one of his more elaborate development
sections. After the return of the opening music, the movement ends
in a mood of contentment. The Andante is a set of
variations on a simple, staccato theme which gives a more
march-like impression though the sense of the ‘song without
words’ is never far away. It ends with an attention-grabbing
dramatic final chord that generated immediate applause. The
unusual Finale is a pastoral-style Scherzo, in Rondo style
that allowed Barenboim to revel in the unshowy bravura of his
pianism so much so that his face, which had been a mask of
concentration throughout, lit up with a fleeting smile.
In
Gustav Mahler's early musical career he performed Piano Sonata
No.26 in E flat, Op.81 (Les Adieux) during his graduation
recital in college and it is believed to be quoted in the
Adagio from his Ninth Symphony so I had been looking forward
to hearing this for the first time. This sonata has genuine
extra-musical inspiration: the escape from Vienna of his
patron Archduke Rudolph who fled along with the entire nobility
and their entourages in anticipation of Napoleon’s army invading
the city. Beethoven was therefore understandably indignant when
his publisher, with an eye on the international market, insisted
on giving the sonata a French title, Les adieux, rather
than the German Lebewohl (Farewell).
Beethoven began the first movement of this sonata in May 1809,
just after the Archduke had gone and a matter of days before
Vienna
was besieged. During the siege Beethoven sheltered in a cellar
with a pillow over his head to protect what hearing he still had.
The remaining two movements were composed in January 1810,
following his patron's return. The dedication reads: ‘On the
departure of his Imperial Highness, for the Archduke Rudolph in
admiration’ though a private dedication in the sketches refers to
the sonata as being ‘written from the heart’. The work reveals the
basic emotions of this ‘farewell-absence-return’ and begins with a
descending three-note figure that represents Le-be-wohl. I
did not immediately recall having heard that in Mahler’s Ninth
Symphony and will listen again more closely next time to see if it
is really there.
In the first movement, the Farewell motif provides the
material for both the first and second subject groups of the main
Allegro, and an obviously programmatic element to the
music. Here the music is more frantic than before but with
delicate scampering runs as though someone is departing over the
horizon. In the second movement, 'The Absence' Barenboim brought
out an almost Tristan like yearning to music that expresses
grief and consolation in two contrasting themes, much anticipation
leads straight into the joyful 'Reunion' of the Finale.
This third movement is in sonata form and depicts the arrival of
the Archduke and his imperial family, returning to
Vienna on 30
January 1810. People of the city were overjoyed. This is heard at
the beginning, when the piano sounds almost like a trumpet
announcing that royalty is approaching. The third movement also
describes the French army withdrawing their bloody siege on the 20
November 1809, and how happy the people of
Vienna
were to see the carnage over. In the helter-skelter virtuoso
passages you can hear galloping horses. The real reason that the
movement is so uplifting is that the Archduke returns to Vienna.
The last movement of Les Adieux is the triumphant part of
the piece which served as a relaxation from the first and second
movements. This reveals Beethoven’s magisterial mature symphonic
writing skills all of which were fully realised by Barenboim
mature artistry.
Beethoven’s 32 piano sonatas span about 28 years of a 30
years composing career. Mozart and Haydn had made this form of
music into a staple of Classical expression and Beethoven
transformed it, bringing it out of the eighteenth-century and
bridging the gap between his distinguished predecessors (though he
overlapped chronologically with his teacher Haydn) and
nineteenth-century Romanticism. He originally wrote works for his
pupils to play until, with increasing deafness, playing the piano
was his only way of 'hearing' music at all, and his emotions are
there for every other listener. Many commentators consider that
Beethoven's way of communing with the soul through his keyboard is
unsurpassed and that he communicates through music things that had
never been said before in this way. For 'Beethoven', you can
almost read 'Barenboim' too as this recital performance was the
culmination both of a life that began 65 years ago and his
striving to to counteract ignorance through art, as he explained
later.
The
'Artist as Leader' Discussion
What followed the recital however, was one of the worst
examples of a national institution trying to justify its existence
and counteract the ‘classical music is elitist’ brigade. It was
one of series of talks devised to have Barenboim apparently draw
‘on his own experiences to consider how artists can become leaders
in tomorrow’s society’. But while Helena Kennedy QC and Jude
Kelly, artistic director of Southbank Centre, stuck gamely to
their brief, Barenboim was having none of it and repeatedly said
‘he was no way political’ and did not consider himself a leader.
He explained how ‘all great artists either project out to the
auditorium or bring the auditorium on to the stage. Artists cannot
be leaders of society and can only be leaders by how they practice
their art.’
Added into the mix was the theatrical veteran, Sir Peter Hall,
who blames politicians for their lack of finance for the Arts,
and Tony Benn who seemed to be there for another debate entirely.
He absolved politicians from their lack of interest in the Arts
and just had to tell us once again how his mother was a
suffragette and always read the Bible to him.
Barenboim was however compelling when he talked about his early
life in
Israel,
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the West-Eastern Divan
project and orchestra. He considered the conflict as a ‘human’ one
that ‘eats me up daily’. He talked about his ‘existential
friendship’ with the Palestinian Edward Said who he described as a
"man of immense culture: he was a writer, very good musician,
who played piano better than some amateurs … and some
professionals! The quality that inspired me was that he had the
capacity to think in music and he gave me the highest compliment
as he told me 'when you play one gets the feeling your fingers
think '.
He knew much more about literature than I do and I knew more about
music. It was only after 1967 that we both became aware in our
different milieus that the conflict couldn’t be ignored. He became
politically active much earlier than our first meeting, I’m still
not. If there was anything I could transmit to him about the
conflict it would be the atmospheric condition in which I grew up.
I was inside and he was outside in the
US. My
family moved to Israel in 1952 and didn’t want to hear about
Jewish history of the twentieth century, they were just concerned
like everyone there on building, 3 years after the war, not only a
homeland but an actual state, to “make gardens out of the desert”.
Only later did I become aware of the pogroms, of places that did
not exist anymore or names that had been changed. I believe the
destiny of the peoples – Israeli and Palestinian – is inextricably
linked and there is no military solution.’ "
Barenboim considers the mindset to have been as follows
‘Jews have been dispersed throughout the world for 20 centuries,
sometimes treated well and sometimes badly. The little strip of
land we occupy is the one place where we will not be persecuted
because we are Jews. The Palestinians counter this by thinking ‘In
the First World War 85% living there were non-Jews and only 15%
Jews so why since 1920 must we accept Jews from countries
throughout the world who want this land for themselves. The
question is how do we get out of this impasse?’
In January 2008, Daniel Barenboim was given Palestinian
citizenship for his promotion of cultural exchange and is believed
to be the first person in the world to hold both Israeli and
Palestinian passports. He noted how the West-Eastern Divan
Orchestra is ‘flatteringly described as an orchestra for peace
when at best it is an orchestra against ignorance. If the idea of
the orchestra had been rational it wouldn’t have succeeded. I have
learnt a lot of facts about how they think in the occupied
territory; music is devoid of the milieu the players grew up in.
In the West-East Divan for some it is not only the first orchestra
they have played in – it is the first orchestra they have heard!
They learn that you have to play music existentially and play for
your life. The first time I played at the Festival Hall in 1956,
it was a Mozart Piano Concerto under Josef Krips who stopped the
second violins in rehearsal and told them “Mozart is aristocratic
or plebeian but never bureaucratic!”
And Barenboim’s explanation for the lack of funding for the
Arts in this country and throughout the world is a lack of
education in schools at all levels in culture – literature, music
and art. (This is something I have also written about in my small
way for many years.) He also blames technological developments for
shortening the next generation’s ability to concentrate. For him
any pianist can play any piece ‘but they will not have the
patience to read through and learn it.’
In conclusion, Barenboim seemed much humbler than he has any right
to be and was extremely thought-provoking. But I am forced to ask
why this short event (lasting only 75 minutes) was not a free
event, if the South Bank believes its own proselytising agenda.
There was an exorbitant charge for ordinary members of the public
of £12 – OK if some charity was involved maybe. None was mentioned
other than, presumably, the Southbank Centre's own coffers.
Jim Pritchard
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page