A 
          Geometer of Sound Crystals is a complex 
          book, as unusual as its title; one which will 
          be read, and used, differently by each of 
          its readers. It is a source book about a composer/musicologist 
          who spent the greater part of his professional 
          life in Moscow, of whom Gerard McBurney wrote 
          "Gradually I began to form some impression 
          of how important this Jewish Romanian pupil 
          of Webern was in the hidden musical life of 
          Moscow, our 'real life' as Sofia Gubaidulina 
          has called it".
        
        It is 
          also a very personal memoire of an extraordinary 
          and idiosyncratic musician and teacher by 
          a younger composer and music theorist, Dmitri 
          Smirnov. Phillipp Moiseyevich Herschkowitz, 
          with whom Smirnov and his composer wife Elena 
          Firsova built a close relationship during 
          the years before they brought their family 
          out of the Soviet Republic to England, had 
          studied with both Berg and Webern. Smirnov's 
          account centres upon the record of a series 
          of lessons and conversations with Herschkowitz, 
          interrupted for ten years because of the Smirnovs' 
          lack of money; subsequently resumed gratis 
          "as I did not pay Webern; I want to give 
          his lessons back". 
        
        Six 
          early lessons, begun in 1970, were highly 
          didactic analyses of Beethoven, especially 
          his piano sonatas, and other Great Masters; 
          Phillipp Moiseyevich Herschkowitz having made 
          clear that he did not teach composition. These 
          are dense, and fully illustrated dissections 
          of individual movements which constitute the 
          core of the book, and reflect what Herschkowitz 
          might best wish to be remembered for. Smirnov 
          makes the cogent point that in Britain "the 
          teaching of musical form and analysis is "at 
          a very superficial or amateurish level - - 
          basic terms of music, such as "period", "sentence" 
          or "theme" are practically eliminated - - 
          ".
        
        These 
          lessons and conversations, meticulously summarised 
          and recalled in detail by Smirnov, need the 
          close attention of a musicologist, ideally 
          a Beethoven specialist, to do them justice, 
          and they are clearly deserving of such attention*. 
          
        
        For 
          the ordinary untrained reader, a huge stumbling 
          block to following the arguments into the 
          experience of listening to the music is that 
          most of us lack perfect pitch, or even a capacity 
          to appreciate key relationships aurally to 
          ponder, for example, why a passage comes in 
          the subdominant instead of the mediant - - 
          - . Many of the problems which exercise Herschkowitz 
          have completely passed me by when enjoying 
          playing and listening to Beethoven's music, 
          but of those which he addressed had also puzzled 
          me, and his solution to it will give readers 
          the flavour of his didactic approach. I too 
          had often wondered why Beethoven in his Seventh 
          Symphony repeats the Trio and Scherzo twice 
          each without any change? (And wished he hadn't!) 
          Herschkowitz explains that if a question is 
          about an abnormality "it is neceesary to 
          search for another abnormality. There is a 
          'mistake' in the Scherzo itself - in bar 44 
          a cadence on the dominant of C major instead 
          of F major. After composing a 'wrong' Scherzo 
          Beethoven had to repeat it again and again: 
          Trio then Scherzo, and then Trio, and then 
          Scherzo again- pretending as if he doesn't 
          know what to do next." 
        
        Paradox 
          features often in Herschkowitz's pronouncements 
          and in ordinary conversation, and is a strand 
          which holds the attention of the ordinary 
          reader, as is also his 'wicked sense of humour', 
          which enlivens many a discussion with outrageous 
          and memorable sallies of wit. Unfortunately, 
          he was not equally receptive to humour from 
          others, and Smirnov recounts how his riposte 
          "Don't you think that perhaps you value 
          yourself too high?" to Herschkowitz's 
          claim that "my idea about the third movement 
          of Mahler's First Symphony is even more genius 
          than the symphony itself" caused a resentment 
          that festered until after the last meeting 
          between them. 
        
        Herschkowitz's 
          chief heroes were Beethoven and Webern, and 
          he can be dismissive of many a revered composer 
          of the recognised canon of the Great. For 
          example, he removed Brahms, Haydn and Berg 
          from his list of Masters and explains why, 
          not fully convincing his pupil and author 
          of this memoir, Dimitri Smirnov. In a discussion 
          of bad music by his greatest classical hero, 
          he includes the Diabelli Variations - "if 
          works are bad, it is wrong to play them." 
          Of the symphonies, Herschkowitz told Smirnov 
          "we have to speak of only six", in 
          "macro cycles 3, 4, 5 and 6, 7, 8". 
          Smirnov demurred that he still likes Nos 1 
          & 9. (It's unclear what either of them 
          had against No.2?) He answered "Dima, you 
          are a good fellow, but you have one fault 
          - - you live too happily"! Likewise, Webern's 
          works without opus numbers "found somewhere 
          in a loft - why do they play them?!!! 
        
        Clearly 
          Herschkowitz would have had no empathy for 
          today's dedication to ever more complete integrales, 
          including recordings of preparatory versions 
          of establshed masterworks. Homework was set 
          and led on to further topics, and the lessons 
          and conversations which took place in the 
          Smirnov/Firsova home and in Herschovitz's 
          are described in full remembered detail, augmented 
          posthumously with extracts from the teacher's 
          published writings (mostly in Russian). 
        
        Smirnov's 
          account is intertwined with details from their 
          personal lives which impinged upon the relationship. 
          Smirnov acquired scores for Herschkowitz, 
          who was not renowned for returning loans promtly, 
          and helped him in the bizarre episode of the 
          demise of Herschovitz's cat's, which left 
          him distraught. Smirnov was enlisted for the 
          funeral and dug the grave for his teacher/friend 
          in frozen soil! We learn about the births 
          of Dimitri & Elena's children, Philip 
          and Alissa Firsova, about their first visit 
          to London to be featured at the Almeida Festival 
          (of which I was a habituee, and where I first 
          become aware of these gifted composers who 
          in due course settled amongst us). Herschkowitz's 
          relative disinterest in their offspring was 
          explained when he declared that he would not 
          be able to visit them again for several years 
          because of 'baby phobia'! Smirnov candidly 
          prints a harsh response in 1986 to his own 
          cantata, criticised for the similarly slow 
          tempi throughout and slavish dependence upon 
          the text, which was 'processed with the 
          sand paper of your singer's high register'. 
          The underlying theme was a warning to distrust 
          one's 'talent', a pejorative word in Herschkowitz's 
          critical vocabulary. 
        
        So, 
          it is a book which is fascinating on various 
          levels, and of enduring value for making available 
          in English the flavour of the sayings and 
          writings of this substantial and unique figure, 
          who spent the central part of his professional 
          life (1940-87) in Moscow, suffering the privations 
          of the time. He felt that his own music until 
          played 'did not exist'. In Smirnov's view 
          Herschkowitz is a significant, largely unpublished 
          and unplayed composer, but his legacy is more 
          likely to command attention in his voluminous 
          theoretical writings. 
        
        Smirnov 
          analyses several of Herschkowitz's compositions 
          and hopes they will eventually find 'dedicated 
          performers and appreciative listeners'. 
          The chances that this may happen are perhaps 
          greater now than ever before, with record 
          companies trawling libraries in search of 
          novelties for premiere recordings - a tendency 
          that Herschkowitz, with his harsh views on 
          music unworthy to be played, might himself 
          deplore! 
        
        A 
          Geometer of Sound Crystals is a well-produced 
          academic publication, with lavish provision 
          of musical examples and a comprehensive index 
          (there are some page 'slippages' and photos 
          promised in the preface do not appear). The 
          appendix lists Herschkowitz's works and writings, 
          with bibliography, biographical chronology 
          and details of three rare performances of 
          his compositions. 
        Peter Grahame 
          Woolf