Anne-Sophie 
          Mutter and the Beethoven Violin Concerto are 
          hardly strangers – she recorded the piece 
          with the Berliner Philharmoniker and von Karajan 
          when a mere slip of a girl (DG 413 818-2), 
          then returned to the piece in May 2000 for 
          a live performance with the New York Philharmonic 
          under Kurt Masur (471 349-2). No surprise, 
          then, that despite her youth (still!), this 
          was a fully-formed and mature interpretation.
        
        There 
          is an evident rapport between Mutter and Masur. 
          At the outset and before a note had been struck, 
          both seemed keen to get on (Mutter seems not 
          to like any sort of bowing to the audience 
          – a sort of token nod suffices). Masur set 
          a tempo that was more Allegro shorn of the 
          ‘ma non troppo’ - he can on occasion give 
          off a feeling of superficiality, and that 
          was certainly the case here. The music did 
          not carry through the silences. Thus segmented, 
          the opening tutti seemed to lack some direction 
          despite some niceties, including obviously 
          carefully prepared balances. The six double 
          basses added weight without any muddying of 
          textures.
        
        Mutter 
          matched the LPO’s lightness of sound by deliberately 
          eschewing an over-sonorous lower register 
          and by projecting the sweetest of melodies 
          at the upper end. Masur’s accompaniment was 
          astonishing in its flexibility – he was right 
          there for her, every time. Yet he could also 
          gloss over some of Beethoven’s more daring 
          moments. When Beethoven sets up a huge registral 
          space in the first movement (high violins 
          juxtaposed with double basses), it was not 
          the quasi-modernist moment it can seem. But 
          the audience came for Mutter, and she did 
          not disappoint. It is not just the textbook-perfect 
          trills which yet had lots of emotion, the 
          faultless tuning or the way she can inject 
          the most innocent arpeggio with volumes of 
          meaning. It was the whole conception, the 
          way she seems to have absorbed this edifice 
          and have it completely underneath her skin. 
          Putting a handkerchief on her violin shoulder 
          for the cadenza (later taking it off again), 
          Mutter elevated this passage’s humble status 
          to an integral part of the experience. It 
          was the Kreisler she played, treating us to 
          a veritable feast of faultless stopping.
        Masur’s 
          expert ear worked wonders with the strings 
          at the onset of the Larghetto (Mutter seemed 
          to be listening intently). Later these same 
          strings formed a bed of sound for Mutter to 
          ruminate over in a meditation of the highest 
          concentration. In my experience, only Oscar 
          Shumsky, many years ago in the same venue, 
          equalled the concentration on offer here. 
          A pity the finale took time to take flight 
          (only in the stratosphere of the themes second 
          statement did the true verve of the movement 
          arrive). The solo bassoon (Philip Tarlton) 
          made his phrases dance infectiously; Mutter 
          really dug into her cadenza, defying belief 
          in her command of her instrument. A performance 
          of some distinction that almost made 
          it to greatness.
        
        Masur’s 
          Shostakovich can be variable. A Thirteenth 
          left me wanting more raw abandon almost exactly 
          a year ago and this was pretty much the same. 
          The etiolated violin line and (very) dotted 
          rhythms of the opening boded well, although 
          there was the niggling suspicion this was 
          all a bit fast. The prominent early oboe entry, 
          that can and should be like a shaft of light, 
          was worryingly literal – similarly, Masur 
          had no time for most harmonic arrival points. 
          Control was all and this worked well in the 
          March with its prominent side drum and glockenspiel. 
          The second movement formed an interpretative 
          pair with the first. Lumbering but agile cellos 
          and double basses impressed, yet one wished 
          for more of a sense of parody (only the horns 
          really obliged, being marvellously vulgar). 
          Only an unexpected ‘Petrushka-moment’ 
          raised eyebrows. 
        
        The 
          final two movements fared better. The rapt 
          song of the Largo was positively radiant, 
          pianissimos really were the stipulated dynamic, 
          and the harp harmonics were ravishing on the 
          ear. Good also that the manic juxtapositions 
          of the finale made for a raw ride and that 
          the timpani, rightly, battered its way through. 
          Nevertheless, it was the Beethoven that made 
          the evening worthwhile.
        
        Colin 
          Clarke