Debussy, orch. Holloway: En Blanc et noir
        Mahler: Symphony No. 5
         
        Until the Kimmel Center opened 
          in December 2001, Philadelphia audiences had 
          few opportunities to hear orchestras from 
          the outside world. Kimmel’s management, and 
          specifically its artistic direction, now imaginatively 
          handled by Mervon Mehta, is busily putting 
          that right, and each season now sees a good 
          assortment of visiting ensembles in its "Great 
          Orchestras on Tour" series. Some of these 
          engagements bring us vividly face to face 
          with the excellences that exist elsewhere; 
          others remind us equally forcefully how lucky 
          we are with the orchestra we may call our 
          own.
        
        That this particular event 
          fell into the latter category in no way negates 
          the value of the enterprise as a whole. Comparisons 
          may be odious, but in a world where the choice 
          of what and whom to listen to is almost dauntingly 
          varied, they are at once useful and mightily 
          illuminating. For the first few minutes of 
          Michael Tilson Thomas’s Mahler Fifth Symphony, 
          I thought this was going to be a fine performance. 
          That little trumpet triplet in the eleventh 
          measure–often an early indication of conductorial 
          alertness or the lack of it–was properly hasty, 
          as directed by the composer. The string textures 
          of the first funeral-march theme was meticulously 
          balanced, and cadence phrases were lovingly 
          and suavely shaped. But that very suavity 
          turned out to be a warning sign. As the evening 
          wore on, Tilson Thomas’s reading proved expertly 
          manicured and very little else. The lovingly 
          shaped phrases grew increasingly wearisome, 
          often slowing the proceedings to the point 
          where one wondered whether the orchestra would 
          ever get to the next note. There was no hint 
          that this, like other Mahler symphonies, is 
          a work that confronts cosmic issues. The grimmer 
          passages were outwardly dramatic but inwardly 
          empty. The great scherzo had sparkle but no 
          real joy. We were afforded scarcely a hint 
          of the gut-wrenching agonies or the spirit-lifting 
          celebrations that marked the opening weeks 
          of Eschenbach’s five-year Mahler cycle, inaugurated 
          just last month. The overall effect was not 
          helped by the fairly inevitable conclusion 
          that the San Francisco Symphony is not remotely 
          in the same class as our Philadelphians, with 
          relatively lustre-less strings, and a timpanist 
          who, in this of all works, either lacked dynamism 
          or was not allowed by the conductor to exercise 
          it. But such weaknesses need not be fatal, 
          as anyone who ever heard some of Hans Rosbaud’s 
          Mahler and Bruckner performances with orchestras 
          of the second and even third rank will be 
          aware. No, the trouble in the end is that, 
          whereas Eschenbach is an inward conductor, 
          a truly spiritual musician with the courage 
          to risk anything in the cause of getting to 
          the heart of the music he leads, Tilson Thomas 
          has always been an outward one, and though 
          there has been much talk lately of his maturation 
          and artistic growth, I could only conclude 
          on the evidence of this performance that he 
          is still an ultimately shallow musician.
        
        The evening had begun, not 
          with the John Adams piece originally programmed, 
          but with an orchestration by Robin Holloway 
          of Debussy’s two-piano suite, En Blanc 
          et noir. "One reason for orchestrating" 
          the work, as Michael Steinberg’s characteristically 
          excellent program note told us, "was 
          to bring it to a wider audience"–a neat 
          reversal of Liszt’s motives, a century and 
          a half ago, in offering his public piano fantasies 
          based on the operatic themes they were unlikely 
          to have much chance of encountering in the 
          theater. In addition to being one of the finest 
          composers working in England today, Holloway 
          (who was present to receive a warm ovation 
          from the audience) is a musician of unusually 
          broad sympathies and a deep understanding 
          of the repertoire, and his orchestral treatment 
          was expert. I did not feel, however, that 
          the piece really worked in this guise, and 
          the experience taught me much less about either 
          Debussy or Holloway than the latter’s brilliant 
          recent two-piano Gilded Goldbergs did 
          about both Holloway and Bach. (There’s a fine 
          recording of this inexhaustibly inventive 
          piece available on the Hyperion label.)
        
        Altogether, then, March 24 
          may not have ranked among Kimmel’s most memorable 
          evenings. But there will be many occasions 
          in the Center’s full schedule that provide 
          greater rewards, and this one was as instructive 
          for what it did not achieve as for what it 
          did.
        
        Bernard Jacobson