Other Links
Editorial Board
-
Editor - Bill Kenny
-
Deputy Editor - Bob Briggs
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN AND HEARD
INTERNATIONAL OPERA REVIEW
Wagner, Parsifal:
Soloists, Staatsopernchor Berlin, Staatskapelle Berlin, Daniel
Barenboim (conductor). Staatsoper Unter den Linden, Berlin, 6.3.2009
(MB)
Amfortas – Hanno Müller-Brachmann
Titurel – Andeas Bauer
Gurnemanz – Matti Salminen
Parsifal – Plácido Domingo
Klinsgor – Christof Fischesser
Kundry – Waltraud Meier
Flowemaidens – Anna Prohaska, Julia Baumeister, Constance Heller,
Anna Samuil, Carola Höhn, Louise Callinan
Knights of the Grail – Paul O’Neill, Fernando Javier Radó
Squires – Anna Prohaska, Louise Callinan, Florian Hoffmann, Peter
Menzel
Bernd Eichinger (director)
Jens Kilian (designs)
fettFilm (video)
Andrea Schmidt-Futterer (costumes)
Staatskapelle Berlin
Staatsopernchor Berlin (chorus master: Eberhard Friedrich)
Daniel Barenboim (conductor)
Meier was her usual excellent self, here given a far better
opportunity to display her strengths than in the Paris Opéra’s
Tristan, when I had last seen her. One could not only hear
but see that she meant every word, even every stage movement. The
three very different Kundrys of the three acts were both
differentiated and yet recognisably incarnations of the same
character, perhaps Wagner’s most intriguing of all. Müller-Brachmann
was – and this is high praise indeed – an equally astonishing
Amfortas. One felt his anguish almost as if it were one’s own;
moreover, one understood why it had to be. Not only was every word
audible and meaningful; it related intimately to the musical
text, as did that to the words. Christoph Fischesser was an
excellent Klingsor: malevolent yet no cartoon villain. His
presentation of the text, musical and verbal, allowed one once again
to understand why he had taken that truly fateful step of his. The
smaller roles were well taken, not least the doubling up as
Flowermaiden and Squire from rising young star, Anna Prohaska,
recent recipient of the TheaterGemeinde Berlin’s Daphne-Preis. Her
diction, like that of most of her colleagues, was as impressive as
her command of line.
The circumstances of Salminen’s participation made his task
difficult. For the most part, he and his unmistakeable voice rose
ably to the challenge. His diction was, if anything, almost too
pronounced, but if a fault that be, it surely errs in the right
direction. There were quite a few instances, however, of uncertain
intonation, partly a result of an extremely wide vibrato. I was
surprised also by the relative thinness – certainly relative to
several other performances I have attended at the Staatsoper – of
the choral sound. The choral contribution was not bad but nor did it
constitute the jewel that it has often proved.
The true musical disappointment, I am sad to say, was Domingo’s
Parsifal. When I have heard him as Siegmund, most recently
for the Royal Opera, I have been greatly impressed. Here,
however, it sounded as though detractors of his Wagner performances
might have been right along. Given that I, not a native speaker, was
constantly troubled by his pronunciation, then Germans most
certainly should have been. More seriously, he seemed to have
forgotten more than a little of the text, both verbal and musical.
At one point, he simply gave up on a line, whilst there were
plentiful instances of mangled syntax – it sounded as though the
spear were to melt rather than to heal Amfortas’s wound –
accompanied by all too audible interventions from the prompter. To
begin with, I thought the latter was a deranged member of the
audience, so loud were her contributions. Moreover, Domingo, for the
first time in my experience, both looked and sounded old. One simply
could not believe that this was Wagner’s ‘pure fool’. Salminen,
hardly at the outset of his career, seemed a youthful Gurnemanz by
comparison: a strange and troubling inversion.
Barenboim was on very good form. There were occasional instances,
notably in the third act, when I thought that transitions were a
little disruptive. The absolute inevitability of everything in, for
instance,
Bernard Haitink’s Covent Garden performance was not quite
attained, but Barenboim was not so very far off; for in general,
this was a commanding traversal of a score he knows so well. Unlike
many conductors, unthinkingly praised in some quarters for
‘consideration towards the singers’, Barenboim knows that the real
drama lies at least as much in Wagner’s Greek Chorus, the orchestra,
as on stage; if the singers cannot cope with Wagner’s orchestra,
then they have no business singing Wagner. Not only does the drama
lie therein; it is here that that drama is bound together through
the density, both complex and yet possessed of a mediated immediacy,
of the motivic connections and transformations. For this truly to
work, one needs a great orchestra. Barenboim’s Staatskapelle
Berlin
did not disappoint. The depth and richness of its string tone
present an object lesson to any orchestra, anywhere. One heard with
pleasure, and sometimes with horror, a great deal of woodwind detail
that can sometimes be submerged, and the brass provided an
especially valuable contribution to the baleful ritual of a dying
community.
However, Bernd Eichinger’s production seems to me fundamentally
misconceived. Eichinger thinks of the work as an essay in
time-travelling. So far as I can tell, this arises from a
misunderstanding of Gurnemanz’s celebrated line, ‘Here space becomes
time’, a line with philosophical roots in Schopenhauer, and beyond
him, Kant. I assume that Kundry’s reincarnations are also involved
in the misconception. It might have worked, I suppose, even if it
were not what Wagner was thinking of. Yet even on its own terms,
Eichinger’s Konzept is confused. The action moves from one
time and location to another, rather as if Wagner had scripted a few
episodes of Doctor Who. Some are more sharply defined than
others, which come across as more of a mishmash. Andrea Schmidt-Futterer’s
often bizarre costumes did not help in this respect. Many of the
settings seemed merely arbitrary. There seemed no especial reason
why images of the Industrial Revolution should accompany Kundry’s
kiss, nor why Gurnemanz, in Act
III, should awaken as a tramp on a park-bench in what appears to be
mid-twentieth-century Manhattan. More problematic, however, is the
fact that sometimes the characters perform against a mere scenic
backdrop, whilst other instances, such as the mildly futuristic
final scene, have them interact with what appears to be a real time
and place. That scene appears to take place after some variety of
bombing – seen on film – and is populated, for some reason, by a
slightly menacing gang of bikers (the chorus).
It is not that the production does not have its isolated moments.
The master-slave dialectic between Klingsor and Kundry presents a
chilling, dramatically credible opening to a second act that then
failed to live up to such promise. Whilst I could not quite work out
intellectually why Amfortas tears out his heart for the knights to
consume during the previous act – perhaps, I wondered, a violent
twist to a Feuerbachian understanding of the elements in Holy
Communion – there is a disturbing, powerful quality to what we see;
it does not, however, seem to have any connection with anything
else. Likewise, the contributions of fettFilm are in themselves of a
typically high quality; it is a pity that they are not married to a
more convincingly thought through production. This is a far cry from
the astonishing achievement of
Stefan Herheim’s Bayreuth production last year. The good news,
however, is that Herheim will be producing a new Lohengrin at
the Staatsoper next month, conducted by Barenboim. I shall report
back.
Mark Berry
Picture ©
Monika Rittershaus
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page