Mussorgsky (1839-1881) - Night on the Bare Mountain
(orig. version)
The wild
man of the Mighty Handful, Modest Mussorgsky's legendary coarseness, something
he perhaps picked up in his army days, is reflected in the correspondingly
uncouth quality of his music. Unfortunately, though I doubt he'd see it
this way, another habit picked up in the army, a predisposition to frequent
alcoholic over-indulgence, resulted in his starting far more than he finished.
Following his early (if not entirely surprising) demise, the commendably
dedicated Rimsky-Kosakov and Glazunov prepared completions of some
of his best work. On the way, they made well-intentioned “improvements”
to iron out what they perceived as flaws in Mussorgsky's drafts. Nowadays,
with the experience of the Twentieth Century's music to draw on, we better
appreciate what Mussorgsky was up to, and are busy putting the "flaws"
back in.
A Night
on the Bare Mountain or, to give its proper title, Saint John's
Night on the Bare Mountain, was inspired by a scene of a witches' sabbath
in Gogol's story of St. John's Eve, and is a lurid melodrama following
in the footsteps of Berlioz (finale of Symphonie Fantastique) and
Liszt (Totentanz). He wrote it in 1867, produced a second,
choral version (1872) as his contribution to a projected collective opera,
Mlada,
and finally recast it in the form of a choral introduction for Act 3 of
Sorochintsy Fair (1873). With no fewer than three versions “in the
can”, there was no question of Rimsky-Korsakov “completing” his friend's
work - his re-working (1908) of Mussorgsky's third version, into the popular
piece we all know and love, was purely for the presumptuous purpose of
“correction”. While we may abhor in principle the subsequent edition for
Walt Disney's Fantasia, which rubbed in further salt by shovelling
the melody of Schubert's Ave Maria into the framework of Rimsky-Korsakov's
oh-so-cosy ending, we must remember that this final “insult” also brought
Mussorgsky's name to the lips of more people than the other four versions
put together.
Rimsky-Korsakov's
urbane manners and taste for tasteful “fairy-tales” dictated that his would
be a sanitised, “PG-rated” version, complete with a cosy bedtime mug of
cocoa. Mussorgsky's original is by comparison “X-rated”, and arguably the
product of a nightmare following a bout of hard drinking and Gogol. If
so, all its crudities and disfugurements come not from “incompetence” but
from terrible experience. The key to Mussorgsky's structure lies in his
programme: “ [1] An underground noise of inhuman voices. Appearance
of the Spirits of Darkness followed by an appearance of Satan and [2] his
adoration. [3] A Black Mass. [4] Joyful dancing of the Witches' Sabbath.
All of which is ended by the ringing of a church bell and the appearance
of dawn”.
Dramatically,
there's no place for any nice, neat recapitulation: following his programme,
Mussorgsky crams his hatful of horrors into a loose, four-part variational
form. Following the relatively familiar sounds of the opening tumult [1],
[2] is “heralded” by a sinister, bulging bass-drum roll, while [3] starts
after a long pause, on eerie tremolandos. This “Black Mass” includes a
parody of a “Russian Orthodox” chant (violas), which Rimsky-Korsakov presumably
found inexcusably offensive, as he completely excised (or should I say
“exorcised”?) it. The final section, [4], starts with a long downward slither,
just one of a catalogue of spine-tingling grotesqueries. Moreover, all
these nasty devils and hobgoblins retire, like Dracula to his “bed”, into
the nether regions at only the very last bar, dispelled by the briefest
hint of church bell and dawn - Mussorgsky denies us any Good Christian
Consolation to ward off the bogey-men lurking in the gloomy shadows as
we troop home.
.
© Paul Serotsky
29, Carr Street,
Kamo,
Whangarei 0101,
Northland,
New Zealand
Conditions
for use apply. Details here
Copyright in these notes is retained by the author without whose prior written permission they may not be used, reproduced, or kept in any form of data storage system. Permission for use will generally be granted on application, free of charge subject to the conditions that (a) the author is duly credited, and (b) a donation is made to a charity of the author's choice.