How do you properly assess a milestone? A
work of both artistic excellence and historic importance? I could rightly
praise the wonderful presentation of this 4 CD set, I could wax lyrical about
the informative, intelligent booklet that provides insights into the work on
both a technical and an aesthetic level, or most particularly, the fact that
the fourth CD included is the entire work found on the other three discs in
advanced resolution DVD audio (which is tremendous!). All of these things are truly
worthy of applause and appreciation.
But ultimately it is really about Howard Shore’s music. Not everyone considers this work to be the towering achievement I
believe it to be, some reviewers finding fault with the stylistic choices the
composer made when he approached what is an undisputed classic of literature, a
tome that is absolutely revered by the fandom community. But what cannot be
denied, whatever your view may be, is the sheer depth of the composition and
the attention to detail in its thematic structure. Many of Shore’s motifs have
now become a part of film music lore and his trilogy of scores has attained a
notable position in the historic development of film scoring. The simple fact
that he wrote a cinematic musical opus on such a grand, epic scale means that
it stands unparalleled (Williams’ entire Star Wars series is the only
thing that even comes close).
Sometimes projects come with such a weight
of expectation that it’s difficult to imagine anything living up to what was
hoped for. The fact that Shore’s music has won so many awards and praise across
the board proves he more than succeeded in his appointed task. If you own a
copy of the original Fellowship of the Ring soundtrack, as magnificent
as that undoubtedly is, do not hesitate to go out and add this new release to
your collection. Yes, it is expensive and few works could justify such an
elaborate and ambitious project. But Shore’s masterwork is not like any other.
The fact that there will be comparable releases for The Two Towers and
The Return of the King further illustrates the uniqueness and the magnitude
of not only what Howard Shore has accomplished, but also how highly these
scores are thought of.
For my own part, I do not say lightly that
I consider the music from the Rings trilogy to be my own personal
nomination as the single greatest achievement in the art of film composing. Of
course, it’s all subjective. An opinion is an opinion, but there will surely be
few who would argue that with this presentation and the others that will
follow, Shore’s work has been given a deserved accolade. Simply stated, if I
could award more than five stars I would. But it’s enough to say that some
soundtrack recordings are must haves. This is one of them. Go and buy it
quickly while you can!
Mark Hockley
5
Gary Dalkin adds:-
This is a nicely packaged set with a CD's worth of good music, maybe a
little more, spread over 3 CDs, and repeated on a single DVD. I can't
help but think it would have made more sense for the customer, if not
the label, to release separate CD and DVD versions; who, but the most
ardent audiophile, needs both? A more reasonably-priced set might have
resulted.
Further, given the supposed definitive
nature of this set, it is 100% unacceptable that 29 pages of the booklet are
missing from the box, and are only available as a downloadable PDF file from
the companion website. Not only does not everyone have internet access – it
should not be taken as a given – it is simply wrong to ask people to pay
anywhere between £35-50 for a luxury box set then expect them to expend their
own time and ink printing the rest of the booklet. The pages which contain the
useful track by track guide which comes as a standard feature of, for example,
every Film Score Monthly booklet. Adding insult to injury, had the superfluous
SACD been omitted the money could have been saved to provide a complete
booklet.
As for the music. There is a considerable
amount of appealing material here which was absent from the original, single
disc version of the soundtrack. Unfortunately the every-last-note (including it
would seem, Bilbo’s to the milkman) approach means the inclusion of yet more of
the inappropriate Celtic folk influenced material which blights the score.
Hobbits are Home Counties bods and their music should be in the English folk
tradition, not pander to some borderline racist Hollywood notion of lovable
‘Orish pixies having a jig – but all know that in post Braveheart and Titanic
Hollywood a) however inappropriate, cod Irish music sells, and b) the English
are dull stick-in-the-mud neo-Nazis who wouldn’t know how to have fun if a
bucket load of monkeys on laughing gas fell on their heads, while the ‘Orish
are salt of the earth ragamuffin funsters always up for a good crack.
There’s a similar problem with the Maori
“grunting”. This is not a racist comment, simply a recognition that the Maori
sound is so distinctive it can not be mistaken for anything other than exactly
what it is, and as such can never have any legitimate place in Tolkien’s
imaginative world, rooted so firmly as it is in the myths, legends and folk
cultures of England and Northern Europe. Finally there’s the problem of the
short snippets of song scattered through the score; Gandalf’s opening number
sounds pretty much like the mumblings of a drunk on their way home from the
pub, and really isn’t necessary apart from the film.
Otherwise there is some impressive music,
but how much better these films could have been directed by an Englishman with
English sensibilities, filmed in North European locations and scored by a
composer such as Christopher Gunning, Patrick Doyle, Adrian Johnson or Debbie
Wiseman.
Gary Dalkin
3