An activist is found murdered, a mild-mannered, Nairobi diplomat is roused into action, conspiracies abound, and a treacherous
pharmaceutical conglomerate needs exposing.
It’s the essence of The Constant Gardener, John le
Carré’s darkest novel to date. Sure, it criticizes, big, bold ideas are
expressed (i.e., HIV-plagued Africa is victim to massive, immoral corporation),
it’s rife with le Carré twists, and even incorporates a tragic tale of love,
but none of it really came alive on page until it reached Hollywood. Normally,
when a picture is better than the novel, it’s because the director or
screenwriter took creative liberties, the movie was based on a short piece, or
the original had little substance. In the case of The Constant Gardener,
a despairing tale of vengeance, the book had immense substance—so much that the
plodding, emotional blandness of it all is a turn off.
Had Fernando Meirelles not directed this film, there
wouldn’t have been a coherent ounce of intensity. Meirelles, the Brazilian
director of City of God, understands vibrancy, crazed energy. Could
someone that can take audiences for a riveting ride through the ghetto-hell
cesspit of drug and gang-infested Brazil infuse some life into le Carré’s
creation? Yes, but it isn’t fully awake. La Carré’s tone, weighty and
chockfull of low level suspense, forces Meirelles to channel a sensational
knack for conveying physical force into subdued, intellectual violence. Even
César Charlone’s exciting, frenzied camerawork is tamed somewhat for the
adaptation. Nonetheless, the director’s strength as a visual storyteller
shines through in his second film: the color palette is still as piquant and
cool as in City of God. And the faces of the two phenomenal actors
(Ralph Fiennes, as Justin Quayle, and Rachel Weisz, as his wife, Tessa) give
the story a much needed heart—despite suppressed performances. (There’s only
so much one can to do without straying from the source.) If only the music
could transcend the work and leave a lasting imprint, I would have overlooked
such fundamental flaws.
Alberto Iglesias, a six-time, Goya-winning Spanish
composer, is best known for his collaborations with Pedro Almodóvar on
independent films such as Sex and Lucía, Live Flesh, All About
My Mother, Bad Education, and Talk to Her. His compositions
are as diverse in instrumentation and styles as they are intriguing, and he has
an impeccable flair for melding forms. The Constant Gardener has
layer upon layer of rhythmic, aural texturing, and Iglesias’s musical gamut
runs from East African instrumentals to Western orchestra. The music is
frequently ethnic and ephemeral. Much like Thomas Newman, Iglesias chooses
unusual instruments and vocals for creating his distinctive sounds; the nyatiti
(the 8-string Kenyan lyre) makes frequent appearances throughout the album
and in the two most pleasant and memorable pieces (‘Dicholo’, ‘Kothbiro’),
performed by East African artist, Ayub Ogada. (The rhythmic, upbeat quality of
his compositions may be similar to Wasis Diop, a Senegalese vocalist, but his
mellifluous tone is the exact opposite.) Along with a myriad of percussive
instruments, the South American guitar (ronroco, a favorite of Gustavo
Santaolalla), Arabic bamboo flute (kawala), and North African double
reed instrument (zumara) combine with each other, perform solos, or
blend with tribal vocals to set some strangely multipurpose moods. (The movie
and score don’t always gel enough in style that you’ll associate the two when
listening to the music.)
The Constant Gardener is neither overwhelming nor minimalistic; it also doesn’t
attempt to adhere to one particular style or develop its minor (and few)
motifs. Like his blend of instruments, Iglesias’s style is seemingly that of
many, and yet manages to be unique. However, strings and a poignant solo
on some type of wind instrument almost always make an appearance in his
compositions. ‘Tessa’s Death’ features this characteristic combination (this
time with a Turkish clarinet) and sets the haunting, melancholy tone for the
album. If the film seems at all slow—yes, remaining true to le Carré’s work
can result in poor pacing – it’s brought back to speed via camerawork and
sometimes the music. (‘To Loki’, ‘To Germany’, ‘Roadblock I’, and ‘Roadblock II’ are among
the better action/suspense tracks.) It's apparent that Iglesias's many cues are intricately composed,
scintillatingly subtle (‘Hospital’), and even rhythmically seductive (‘To Airport’)…
but oftentimes—without a track listing on hand, they aren't so intense that you can always
recall exactly what was happening in the film. …Although, you might when listening to ‘Jomo Gets an
HIV Test’ and ‘Motorbike’ due to their vague similarity to other mystery thriller scores or sheer sonic weirdness.
For a film and novel that focuses on a tragic love
relationship to tell a bigger story, it’s strange when love is sidelined for an
ineffectual criticism of pharmaceutical companies. Though virtually
nonexistent in the text, this bond of love is made more intense, and more
importantly, plausible through Fiennes and Weisz, so we understand
Justin’s journey into hell to find the answers. But when he finally realizes
the truth of reality, has the knowledge, and the upper hand… why does he
forfeit his life? That’s mostly a question for le Carré. (The pantywaist
protagonist of the lit is an all-around failure, so running off to die is a
semi-reasonable—if bathetic, choice.)
Nevertheless, Iglesias was hired to score the film, not the
book. Passions are what make thrilling “thrillers” regardless of the material
intelligence. Iglesias failed to take the music to another level despite the
Oscar nomination for the album. I always believe that keen emotions are
required for a score to succeed within a film and as a standalone album; the
best scores often add more to the film, and bring to it an insightful,
different dimension that cannot be seen or revealed through dialogue. If this
album isn’t listenable on the first pass (not for reasons pertaining to foreign
instrumentation or atonal/dissonant phrasing), it’s due to its preoccupied
state. I didn’t get much out of it in the film, but on my first album listen,
it felt vaguely restrained, and seemed to exist for the sake of itself. The
work obviously isn’t devoid of emotion, but the emotional shades rendered weren’t always distinct,
germane—in the sense that if most everything was worthy of mention, what truly mattered?
When you view all colors of the spectrum simultaneously—or accept the million one details of
the story, you see white... a lot of it, but that's really all you see. Iglesias’s composition
becomes a functional narrator of general moods and situations, so much that it does little more than
acknowledge the characters and their plights, i.e., ‘Justin's Death’. (Furthermore, the few
moments of poignancy often didn’t have any music.)
It shouldn’t be
astonishing if two gifted actors become the film’s saving grace. Le Carré’s
carefully manufactured, logical tone blots out much of whatever nascent or
intrinsic emotions there are in music, direction, or visuals. But when the
story and messages are as milquetoastish as the book version Quayle, the music
should never follow suit: doing what’s necessary and giving up when it’s time.
Tina Huang
In-Movie: 3
Standalone Score: 2
Score for something else entirely or standalone music album without any affiliation whatsoever with book and movie (and never as generic “world music”): 4
Michael McLennan adds:-
Armed with Tina’s critique of Iglesias’ score and both its filmic function and standalone value, the reader is liable to question my commendation of this score. I discuss the score – both on album and in the film – at greater length in my
editorial. For those who don’t care to read it, suffice to say that with beautifully subtle writing for multiple specialized instruments, this score is a gem
both within its film and away from it. And the best comes from ‘Justin’s Death’, a seemingly improvised piece in isolation, but in context one of the best spotted and most dramatically brilliant cues in recent film. Though some key cues were
unused in the film, Iglesias’s score was well deserving of its surprising Oscar nomination, and it was surely better than that award’s unauspicious winner.
Michael McLennan
4.5