Founding Editor Rob Barnett Editor in Chief
John Quinn Seen & Heard Editor Emeritus Bill Kenny MusicWeb Webmaster
David Barker Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf MusicWeb Founder Len Mullenger
Support us financially by purchasing this from
Johann Sebastian BACH (1685-1750) Die Kunst der Fuga
(The Art of Fugue), BWV1080 (from MS Bach P200, 1742-1750)
Track details after review.
Accademia Strumentale Italiana/Alberto Rasi (treble viol)
rec. Nazareth Church, Verona, Italy, 13 September 2019. DDD.
CHALLENGE CLASSICS CC72842
How many players does it take to perform Bach’s Musical Offering
and Die Kunst der Fuge, The Art of Fugue? And in what
order should the pieces in both collections be played? In neither case is
there a simple answer, but there has to be a minimum of voices in the case
of the Art of Fugue, hereafter KdF. Those four voices can be
provided by the organ, and that has traditionally tended to be the answer,
with very fine performances on that instrument from the likes of Helmut
Walcha (DG Original Masters E4776508, download only: Highly Recommended –
July 2009. NB: ignore the passionato link; they no longer exist.) That’s a
recording which I never want to be without, and it supplements KdF with
equally classic accounts of five other Bach organ works. The download,
which comes with a digital booklet, costs around £15 in lossless sound;
though the stereo dates from 1955, it still sounds well and it remains a
benchmark for the finest of traditional Bach. The 1725 Alkmaar organ is one
of the best preserved of the period and Walcha clearly enjoys playing it,
making his recording much more than an intellectual exercise. (Try track 2,
a rocking account of contrapunctus 2.) It can be streamed from
Naxos Music Library.
Other very worthwhile performances on the organ include Hans Fagius,
recorded in 1999 (BIS-1034). Terry Barfoot, awarding four stars, thought
the rewards of this recording considerable –
Though Fagius takes just three seconds longer than Walcha in contrapunctus 2, I don’t get the impression that he’s loving the
music to the same extent; his boat is sailing serenely to its destination,
where Walcha’s seems to experiencing a little natural turbulence that suits
the music well.
André Isoir on a reissue of a Calliope recording on the Gerhard-Grenzig
organ, Saint-Cyprien en Périgord (La Dolce Volta LDV50, mid-price CD, or
LDV200, download) gives us a rather grander account of contrapunctus 2, but he, too, gives the impression that he simply
enjoys the music.
If it’s KdF on the piano that you seek, look no further than Angela Hewitt
on Hyperion (CDA67980, 2 CDs for the price of one). Hewitt’s Bach is the
exception to my rule of disliking his music on the piano and her Art of
Fugue is almost enough to wean me off Walcha – see
DL News 2014/14.
Walcha, Fagius, Isoir and Hewitt play the music as published in the printed
editions, though with some rearrangement of the order in some cases, on the
rationale for which, see below. Alberto Rasi and his team have returned to
the manuscript, where the title is Die Kunst der Fuga, not Fuge, employing the Latin or Italian word. In line with recent
academic thinking, the manuscript version is not regarded as an incomplete
trial run, but an original version in its own right of the more familiar
KdF. As the notes point out, the published edition appeared in something of
a hurry, presumably to provide a source of income for Bach’s descendants.
The actual date of the music has always been left open – Malcolm Boyd’s
influential book in the Dent Master Musicians series (London 1983, 1990)
offers a very wide range, ‘?1742-9’, and Alison Latham’s article in the
latest Oxford Companion to Music is equally non-committal – ‘in the 1740s’.
Without getting involved in all the details, which are laid out
persuasively in the booklet, the result as recorded here certainly offers a
version of KdF which is well worth hearing. Those who know the standard
edition well, will find the order of the manuscript and the corresponding
number in the printed edition at the end of this review.
Again, without getting bogged down in detail, it has long been thought that
the order of the music in the printed edition is ‘increasingly bewildering
as the work progresses’ (Boyd, p.202). Why would Bach not follow the simple
theme of the first section with its inversion, placed third in the printed
edition. Thus, Podger, with Brecon Baroque, and Isoir switch the order of
these two sections to make more sense.
Walcha plays these in the published order, but rearranges some of the other
material; Isoir goes further and rearranges several sections radically.
Jordi Savall on his very fine Alia Vox recording also rearranges several of
the pieces –
Presumably, these performers made the changes based on a feeling of how
the music made sense – I can’t be sure because Isoir, whose rearrangement
is the most radical, comes as a download without a booklet, so I can’t
follow his reasoning. Nor can I understand why the incomplete final fugue
(No.18) is renumbered as 19 and placed between 13/2 and 16. Rasi and his
team, following the Berlin MS, make even more sense, and do so with the
authority of the composer’s autograph.
In both the MS and printed versions, the final fugue is unfinished. It’s
best left that way; the practice of completing the work with Bach’s final
piece Wenn wir in höchsten Nöthen, supposedly dictated by the
composer from his deathbed, is less fashionable these days. It was
published with KdF, but doesn’t form part of it, nor does Vor deinen Thron tret’ ich, with which some conclude the work.
You have to be a purist to want to end Turandot incomplete, at the
moment where Puccini died in mid flow, but there’s something appropriate
about the way in which the final part of KdF breaks off. Isoir’s recording,
which radically rearranges the movements, places contrapunctus 17
last, which works well, ending, as Bach’s autograph begins, with a rectus and inversus.
Why not just play the music on the organ, as Walcha and others prove can be
done very satisfactorily, or even on the harpsichord, fortepiano or piano?
This is not the first recording to use an instrumental ensemble, but it
does so employing instruments which could well have been used at the time:
violin, treble, tenor and bass viol, violone and organ. The obvious
comparison, therefore, is with Rachel Podger and Brecon Baroque (Channel
Classics CCSSA38316 –
review, rather than, say, the Academy of Saint Martin in the Fields and Neville
Marriner, with Christopher Hogwood (organ), revelatory as their
modern-instrument-with-period awareness performances were back in the day
(Decca Duo 4425562, with Musical Offering).
Excellent as Podger and her team are – and their recording is available on
SACD – there is a clear difference in the instruments employed: violins,
violas, cello and harpsichord. I have to admit that the use of the organ,
heard in the very opening bars of the new Challenge Classics, seems to me
preferable to the harpsichord. And though the use of members of the viol
family would have seemed old-fashioned in Bach’s time, as on Jordi Savall’s
recording they really work in this music.
The Savall is now download only from most dealers and, since it runs to
the equivalent of two
discs, somewhat expensive. For once, Hesperion XX don’t exactly bring the
house down; in fact, I have sympathy with those who think the tempi just
too slow. Even in the opening three short works they tend to take longer
than Marriner or Walcha and in two of the longer items, Contrapunctus 8 and Contrapunctus 11 (tracks 8 and 10 on
the new recording), at around 8 minutes, they are by some length slowest in
Rasi and Podger tend to be much closer in agreement, though neither can be
accused of rushing the music, even by those nurtured on Walcha or Marriner.
On track 10 of the new recording, the Fuga a tre soggetti a3,
equivalent to Contrapunctus 8, is given almost as much time to
establish itself as on the older recordings. Is it a shade too deliberate,
especially by comparison with Podger and Brecon Baroque? Deliberate, yes,
but not stodgy.
Rachel Podger entrusts track 13, canon duodecima, and track 15, canon decima, to the harpsichord of Marcin Świątkiewicz. The
performance of canon duodecima by the full ensemble, is both
livelier and somehow more meaningful from Rasi and his team; much as I like
Bach’s music on the harpsichord, here it sounds like a voice crying in the
wilderness. Nor can it match Luca Guglielmi (organ) in the canon decima on the new Challenge Classics CD.
Predictably, Angela Hewitt on the modern piano on Hyperion gives these two
canons more substance than the harpsichord. Like the new Challenge Classics
recording, she places those two canons one after the other. I like what I
hear, but the new recording scores by varying the two between solo and
ensemble. All things considered, the sheer lack of variation inclines me
away from recordings of KdF which employ only the piano, harpsichord or
clavichord (yes, there is at least one recording on that very intimate
instrument) and towards the organ or an instrumental ensemble.
I’ve compared the serene passage of Fagius through contrapunctus 2
with the degree of appropriate rocking that Walcha imparts to the journey.
Rasi leaves this section – placed third on the new recording – to the organ
solo, so direct comparisons are in order. While I still find that Walcha
endears me more than anyone to the music here, Guglielmi on Challenge
Classics comes very close; I just wish that we had been told about the
organ which he uses, presumably that of Nazareth Church, Verona, where the
recording was made. If so, I’d have liked its specification.
Podger, on the other hand, having assigned the two earlier tracks (contrapunctus 1 and 3) to the solo harpsichord, performs contrapunctus 2 with the ensemble and, though they choose a light
and airy tempo, considerably faster than Walcha and slightly faster than
Guglielmi, the result sounds less as if they are enjoying the music.
Lack of information about the organ apart, the notes in the booklet are
excellent; in addition to describing the differences between the MS and
printed version of KdF, they contain analysis of Bach’s numerological
beliefs. These seem to have been very important to him; he apparently
allowed other members to join the learned society der Musicalischen Wissenschaften (musical sciences) before him
order to be the fourteenth, the numerical sum of the letters of his name.
I’m less persuaded by the argument that the music in the MS represents the
name B-A-C-H, i.e. 2 related works – 1 single piece – 3 related works and 8
No other recording that I’m aware of employs Bach’s autograph manuscript
and – more to the point – far from being an exotic alternative, makes sense
of the order of the sections there as opposed to the printed editions. The
recording on disc is CD only, whereas Poger on Channel Classics comes on hybrid
SACD, but the Challenge Classics recording is very good, and there’s the
option of 24-bit for those prepared to pay a little extra. It’s almost
worth having for the booklet alone, but the same applies to the Podger
recording – both can be found online at Qobuz. Some UK dealers offer
the new Challenge Classics as a download only, and not always with the
One assertion made in Malcolm Boyd’s influential Master Musicians volume
can easily be discounted. It’s his belief that the music of Bach’s later
period can be appreciated only by following the score and understanding the
musical science which underlies the work. It’s perfectly true that, as the
new Challenge Classics booklet states, ‘The work is part of Bach’s scientific production and the embodiment of the interest in
counterpoint and its artifices: an interest which defined the last decade
of his life’, but the performance proves that the music can be appreciated
without any recourse to musicology – and it shares that quality with the
other recordings which I have mentioned.
By all means follow the score – fortuitously, the autograph version used on
this recording can be found free online from
and YouTube offer a tutorial on which
you can listen to the music and follow the printed score – but do enjoy the
music as these performers clearly do, and not just intellectually.
I’ve said that I prefer the greater variety of the organ or an ensemble in
this music, which means that I should have to choose Helmut Walcha for my
Desert Island. On the other hand, the solo organ sections on the new
Challenge Classics recording are almost the equal of Walcha, and there’s
the added variety of the instrumental ensemble. The new CD is complete on
one disc, whereas Walcha runs to two, albeit with extra music, and his
recording can be obtained only as a download. If you are looking for a
single-CD organ recording, I think Isoir has the edge on Fagius, as well as
a price advantage. Overall, it looks as if Alberto Rasi and his Accademia
will also feature in my future listening, presenting the music as it
appears in autograph and making a strong case for it.
Details  I. Fuga simplex rectus BWV1080/1 [3:04]
 II. Fuga simplex inversus BWV1080/3 [2:57]
 III. Fuga plagalis BWV1080/2 [2:48]
 IV. Counter-fugue – fuga inversa BWV1080/5 [3:16]
 V. Fuga rectus with obbligato countersubjects alla Duodecima BWV1080/9 [2:29]
 VI. Fuga inversus with two obbligato countersubjects alla Decima BWV1080/10 [3:47]
 VII. Fuga inversa in Stylo Francese BWV1080/6a [3:34]
 VIII. Fuga inversa per Augment. et Diminut. BWV1080/7 [4:37]
 IX. Canon in Hypodiapason (Canon alla Ottava)
 X. Fuga a tre Soggetti à 3 BWV1080/8 [7:15]
 XI. Fuga a quattro soggetti à 4 BWV1080/11 [6:38]
 XII. Canon per Augmentationem in contrario motu BWV1080/14
 XIIIa. Mirror fugue in contrappunto simplici à 4 rectus
 XIIIb. Mirror fugue in contrappunto simplici à 4 inversus
 XIVa. Mirror fuga inversa in contrappunto duplici à 3 rectus
 XIVb. Mirror fuga inversa in contrappunto duplici à 3 inversus
 Fuga a 3 Soggetti [unfinished] [8:38]