Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor Rob Barnett Editor in Chief
John Quinn Contributing Editor Ralph Moore Webmaster
David Barker Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf MusicWeb Founder Len Mullenger
Support us financially by purchasing this from
Dmitri SHOSTAKOVICH (1906-1975) Symphony
No.6 in B minor, Op.54 (1939) [31:22]
Sinfonietta, Op.110b (String Quartet No.8, arr. for string orchestra
and timpani by Abram Stasevich) [25:04]
Estonian Festival Orchestra/Paavo Järvi
rec. 2016/17, Pärnu Concert Hall, Pärnu (Estonia). DDD. ALPHA389 [56:28]
We learn from a note by Paavo Järvi in the booklet that there’s
a bit of a story behind this disc. He relates that Pärnu is “a
quiet seaside resort on the Baltic cost, south of Tallinn”. Here
the Järvi family would take their summer holidays each year when Paavo
was growing up. This was the period of what he tellingly refers to as
the [Soviet] “occupation” and a number of Soviet artists
would visit Pärnu for their vacations, among them Shostakovich. In 1973
the ten-year-old Paavo and his father, Neeme, met Shostakovich at Pärnu
and a photograph of that meeting is reproduced in the booklet.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, when Estonia regained its independence
the Järvi family were able to return to their own country from the USA
and Neeme Järvi established a conducting Masterclass Academy at Pärnu;
in 2011 this expanded into a festival and at the same time the Estonian
Festival Orchestra (EFO) came into being. The EFO consists of young
Estonian musicians playing side-by-side with established musicians from
around the world. This disc is the EFO’s debut recording and Paavo
Järvi explains that the choice of Shostakovich’s music reflects
the Soviet master’s links to Pärnu.
Järvi’s account of the Sixth symphony opens auspiciously; there’s
fine sonority from the lower-range instruments as they intone the long,
searching melody with which the work begins. Indeed, throughout the
performance the playing of the EFO is very fine in all departments.
I think Järvi paces this movement pretty well throughout, sustaining
tension, which isn’t always easy, and also thrusting home the
intense climaxes. One reason that it’s a challenge to sustain
tension is the many episodes where the music is very sparse in texture,
relying on one or two instruments to sustain the melodic argument over
very spare accompaniment. In this respect the movement seems to me to
prefigure the opening movement of the Eleventh symphony and Järvi’s
performance often put me in mind of that later symphony. He and his
orchestra evoke very well the glacial aspect of the music and at times
I was put in mind of late Sibelius. I think Järvi paces and controls
this movement intelligently and successfully. For a comparison I turned
to the recording by Vasily Petrenko and the RLPO. I found much to admire
in that performance when I reviewed
it. However, I’ve come to think that Petrenko is perhaps too expansive
in the first movement, which in his hands plays for 19:45. Järvi gives
the music the time it needs to make its mark but his performance is
just a bit more taut than Petrenko and, revealingly, his overall timing
of 18:23 is pretty close to two other recordings I much admire: Bernard
Haitink’s1983 Decca recording ,which plays for 17:47 (review),
and Kurt Sanderling’s 1970 account with the Berliner Sinfonie-Orchester,
which takes 18:55.
The symphony is a curious construct in that the long, brooding Largo
is then followed by two much shorter movements in quick tempo. Tart,
agile woodwinds launch Järvi’s performance of the second movement,
Allegro. Much of this movement is forceful, even strident,
and the EFO projects the music very strongly. The following Presto
movement is given a high-energy reading in which Shostakovich’s
brash, sardonic writing is delivered with panache. Petrenko doesn’t
quite match Järvi’s fleetness of foot here; furthermore, the sound
on his recording has the orchestra rather more distanced than we experience
in the Alpha recording; as a result the Petrenko performance doesn’t
have as much of the essential bite in comparison with the Järvi performance.
I think that this Järvi performance of the Sixth is a pretty fine one.
The conductor has the measure of the score and his orchestra really
delivers. The engineers have captured the performance in a recording
which has presence and impact.
The coupling is something of a curiosity. Many readers will know of
the arrangement for string orchestra which Rudolf Barshai made of the
Eighth String Quartet. I believe that this was done with the composer’s
approval and, indeed, it’s referred to as Op 110a. Prior to receiving
this disc I was unaware of the existence of a second arrangement of
the quartet. This was made by Abram Stasevich, who Paavo Järvi describes
as Shostakovich’s “trusted friend”. He adds that the
orchestration was undertaken “with the composer’s personal
blessing”. It’s noteworthy that Stasevich’s version
was also allocated an opus number, Op 110b . Lacking a score of either
this arrangement or the one by Barshai, I can’t say to what extent
the respective arrangements for strings may differ from each other but
the Stasevich version has one crucial point of difference: he adds a
part for timpani, here played by Madis Metsamart, who is clearly a very
accomplished timpanist. I find it intriguing that Shostakovich apparently
sanctioned two arrangements of the same work. The Stasevich dates from
1961, a year after the harrowing quartet was unveiled in its original
form. I don’t know when the Barshai arrangement was made: which
came first?
I’ve heard the Barshai arrangement in a very fine performance
indeed (review).
There are gains and losses from arranging a string quartet for a larger
body of strings. One loses the intimacy and, in the case of the Eighth
Quartet at least – some of the astringency. On the other hand,
a larger body of strings adds considerable weight and transforms what
was almost a confessional work into a very public document. I have to
say that I’m not sure that Stasevich’s addition of timpani
achieves very much and in one respect I think it actually detracts.
In the first, third and fifth movements of the work his use of the drums
is extremely restrained. The timpani are much more prominent in the
other two movements, both of which are in fast tempi and forceful in
nature. My chief reservation concerns the fourth movement. Those who
know the quartet will recall that the course of this movement is punctuated
on many occasions by a graphic three-chord figure. On almost every occasion
that this figure is heard Stasevich reinforces the strings with fortissimo
timpani strokes. These add to the drama – though is such an addition
needed any way? – but my concern is that the drum strokes render
all-but inaudible the harmony of the chords. I think that’s a
miscalculation. In any case, the strings of the EFO really don’t
need any reinforcement. Their playing in the two quick movements has
searing power. If anything, the strings are even more impressive in
the subdued slow movements with which the work begins and ends. The
performance of the opening Largo, very well shaped by Järvi,
is oppressively brooding. The profound lament, permeated with the DSCH
motto, that is the closing Largo is marvellously done here:
Järvi and his players offer a searching account of the music. Despite
my reservations over the use of the timpani in the arrangement, this
is a fine performance and the use of a string orchestra brings a different
dimension to one of Shostakovich’s most bleak and introverted
works.
The playing time of this disc is a little on the parsimonious side,
though the quality of the performances acts as a mitigating factor.
The engineering is very good: in both works the music is reported truthfully.
The booklet offers an essay by the conductor and a biography of him
in four languages as well as a selection of colour photographs besides
the black-and-white picture of Järvi and his father with Shostakovich
to which I referred earlier. Järvi’s essay is valuable. However,
it’s a pity that Alpha couldn’t have found room for a note
about the music per se, which would be helpful to someone who
buys this disc knowing little about one or both works.
Overall, though, this is a strong addition to the Shostakovich discography.