Johann Sebastian BACH (1685-1750) Ich ruf’ zu Dir, Herr Jesu Christ, BWV 639 [2:54] Ich habe genug, BWV 82 [23:12]
Orchestral Suite No. 2 in B minor, BWV 1067 [20:27]
Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor, BWV 582 [18:33]
Stephan Genz (baritone)
Alya Vodovozova (flute)
Russian National Orchestra/Metropolitan Hilarion Alfeyev
rec. 2015, Moscow
Reviewed in stereo & surround
Booklet notes in English & German, no texts PENTATONE PTC5186593 SACD [65:52]
Tear off your hair shirt for some good old-fashioned, big-band Bach.
If, though, you want to get fully into Metropolitan Hilarion Alfeyev’s Bach party, you may have to don some vestments instead. As Alfeyev seems to suggest in his rather pious liner note, it helps to have the God gene to properly appreciate Johann Sebastian’s gift – it’s above all about “spiritual symbolism and spiritual content”, and “music (that is) deeply mystical because it is based on an experience of prayer and ministry to God”. Very little, apparently, to do with indelible melodies, unique harmonies, perfect form, or any of those other absolute, abstract touches of genius that make for great music from anybody, anywhere, at any time. I also detect in Alfeyev's
approach to Bach a Brucknerian view that “grandeur and truly symphonic scale” will
more likely get the Almighty’s attention. Hmm ... while Bach, by the way, is one of my musical gods, I have a hunch that someone as smart as JSB, if enlightened by today’s knowledge of reality, would see life, the universe, and everything else quite differently. And still compose indestructibly great music.
Perhaps adding to the whiff of hubris, Alfeyev is extolled in the publicity blurb as “Russia’s foremost composer”. Really? That’s news to me. My research comes up predominantly with references to him as a bishop of the Russian Orthodox Church, author of many books on theology and, coincidentally, a composer. Such aggrandizement can’t be blamed on Alfeyev, I suppose, but you would expect at least a substantial discography to back it up – there isn’t one. Further, the only recording of his music reviewed on this site was a bit of a stinker, it seems.
Alfeyev and I, however, may have some common ground on music performance. He says in the liner note:
“I am not at all fascinated by the modern fashion to play Bach in the so-called ‘authentic’ style, whatever it may mean, when the orchestra is tuned one tone lower (which is unbearable for people with perfect pitch), the tempos are too fast, and the entire manner of performance is artificially oriented towards what is believed to be peculiar for Bach’s epoch. Bach’s music is not a museum piece. Living in modern times, we have full rights to use the scale of modern means of expression in order to translate to the listener the outstanding grandeur and timeless beauty of his music.”
Amen to that, and for Bach substitute just about every composer of note before or since, as I see the authenticity juggernaut has now reached Ravel.
Given his expansive view though, Alfeyev’s choice of centrepiece in this Bach concert may seem a little bizarre. The cantata for baritone solo Ich habe genug
(“I have enough”) has humbly minimalist connotations; to then throw the full
weight of the Russian National Orchestra behind it is rather to say “I have
more than enough, and then some ...”. Here, contrary to Alfeyev’s
proselytising about the deeper meanings of Bach’s music, it’s probably better
not to know what the music is about (no texts, anyway), and just enjoy it for
what you hear. And lovely it is, my only vision being of soloist Stephan Genz
in tuxedo floating on a cloud of lush string harmony. Genz has a beautiful
voice, if just lacking a little power in its lowest reaches. Plaudits also to
the unnamed oboe
soloist. Despite his protestation about fast tempos, Alfeyev doesn’t wallow, despatching the work in significantly less time than the classic 1965 account with John Shirley-Quirk and the Academy of St Martin-in-the-Fields under Neville Marriner. Shirley-Quirk, with greater tonal weight and palpable gravitas, gives us the sackcloth-and-ashes version. I can take either.
Over to the secular side, the second major work on the disc is the Orchestral Suite No. 2, with the prominent flute part, and here I couldn’t help getting some déjà vu of James Galway in his efforts to popularise classical music. There’s nothing new about big-band Bach for this work, witness Otto Klemperer and Herbert von Karajan for example, but again there’s an élan about the present performance that clearly places it in a more modern context. Alfeyev as before doesn’t hang about, his movement timings on a par with, and overall quicker than, the ‘authentic’ Masaaki Suzuki with the Bach Collegium Japan. And to their credit, Alfeyev and his multitudinous players don’t sound at all rushed, just nicely buoyant.
This time the excellent soloist, flautist Alya Vodovozova, is named. If there is a downside, this is not the lithest performance of the Suite you’ll hear, the mass of forces involved militating against the sharpest attack and pointing of detail.
Alfeyev’s own orchestrations of two Bach organ works begin and end the programme. The chorale prelude Ich ruf’ zu Dir, Herr Jesu Christ is tastily presented with the voices of trumpet and oboe as toppings on a vanilla string base. With his arrangement of the Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor, however, Alfeyev joins the major league, other members including Leopold Stokowski, Ottorino Respighi, Eugene Ormandy and, yes, Sir Andrew Davis. The first two transcriptions I know well, so how does Alfeyev do? Simply, wow! I’m trying hard not to be overly swayed by the stunning Pentatone recording, which in surround sound is quite overwhelming, but Alfeyev’s is a masterful effort, using the full resources of the orchestra, appropriately, colourfully, and to maximum effect. Very Russian is the prominent use of bells and, paradoxically, the only missing element, I suggest, is an organ. Some subterranean pedal tones underpinning all that glorious noise might have converted me – well, not really, but I think you know what I mean. Whether or not Alfeyev’s transcription gets into the general music literature for this piece, time will tell. Prima facie, it deserves to.
Dutifully reading the liner notes possibly set me off on the wrong foot with this review, expecting certainly some explanation of the religious roots of Bach’s music, but not a mini-sermon. I suppose I should have taken a clue from the cover artwork. Using just my ears, though, Metropolitan Hilarion Alfeyev delivers a rich feast which resoundingly conveys the grandeur and beauty of Bach’s music and, for me, its genius and universality. The epiphanies are optional.
We are currently
offering in excess of 51,000 reviews
Founding Editor Rob Barnett Editor in Chief
John Quinn Seen & Heard Editor Emeritus Bill Kenny MusicWeb Webmaster
David Barker Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf MusicWeb Founder Len Mullenger