This is a popular coupling, but it is not that obvious
that these two works have a lot in common apart from being four movement piano
trios by Frenchmen. The Chausson is an early piece from 1881, and a fine achievement
which the composer would later surpass, while the Ravel is one of his mature
works from 1914 and a pinnacle of this difficult genre. Also Chausson loved
Wagner and Ravel revered Mozart, and in both cases it shows. The former gives
us a Franckian cyclical work, with a late Romantic and occasionally hothouse
sensibility, impetuous, fervent, and densely scored for the medium. The Ravel
is as cool, controlled, tender and technically immaculate as we expect from
that artist, with more air in the texture - as in the beguiling last page
of the beautiful
passacaille, where a piano solo is followed by a
duo for the two string players which then gives way to a final cello-and-piano
statement of the theme. These two pieces generate a different emotional temperature,
and performing them requires a different artistic temperament. So it is surprising
perhaps that both performances in this coupling often tend to be equally successful
– as they are here.
Trio Solisti are excellent players, and the Chausson is especially well executed.
There is a coiled tension to the first statements in the opening
Pas trop
lent introductory part of the first movement, and they give it everything
in the stormier passages which follow in the
animé main section –
it is important to sound committed to such passionate music as this, and they
do. The second movement, marked
Vite, is certainly full of life here,
and the players sound as if they are enjoying the swift succession of the
uneven phrase lengths. Their account of the slow movement has a withdrawn
brooding melancholy, and the finale, which like the scherzo at times recalls
Brahms more than Franck or Wagner, is given with a lilting insouciance. At
least it is until the end, when the cyclic theme is recalled to generate a
passionate conclusion, which Trio Solisti play with a satisfying sense of
bringing events full circle. Their consistency in handling the tempo and phrasing
of the main cyclic theme is a benefit throughout in providing structural signposts.
The Ravel Trio also is very scrupulously performed, with the fastidious markings
well observed throughout, yet with a sense of a real, lived-in performance.
This is demanding music — Ravel said he himself was “absolutely
incapable of performing the piano part” — but one can hear why
these three players opted for their name of Trio Solisti. Soloists they may
be, but they blend well too, which is essential in several passages to get
the effect Ravel wanted. Tempi are close to the metronome marks without sounding
metronomic, the Trios Solisti remaining expressively and subtly flexible within
that metrical discipline.
A pity that neither here nor in the Chausson are they given recording quality
to match the atmosphere of the music. It’s a bit close and dry, slightly
glassy in the upper range of the violin and piano, and a little tubby in the
very low piano notes of the great passacaglia slow movement – and these
are melodic notes, needing to resonate expressively at the slow tempo. When
the music gets loud and clamorous in the
Pantoum second movement
and the finale, there is some hardness and congestion. A piano trio is a difficult
combination to balance not only for the composer and the players but also
for the recording engineer. I would not wish to exaggerate this issue as the
sound never compromises the excellence of the performances – but a little
more bloom would have been beneficial. In all other respects this is an attractive
release from very fine musicians.
Other rewarding versions of this coupling came from the Beaux Arts Trio on
Philips in 1984, the Trio Wanderer on Harmonia Mundi in 1999 (now at bargain
price in its 2007 reissue), and the Trio Chausson on Mirare in 2007. For those
who prefer to collect each of these works on discs devoted to a single composer,
there is the outstanding all-Chausson disc on Hyperion from 2000, which also
has the chamber version of the well-known
Poème. For the Ravel trio,
the 1996 Philips Solo issue brought together the Beaux Arts Trio’s earlier
version with the String Quartet from the Quartetto Italiano and the Violin
Sonata from Arthur Grumiaux – a great Ravel CD so it is still worth
seeking out an affordable copy. Or, as suggested in an earlier MusicWeb International
review of this Trio Solisti release, there is the fine 2001 recording from
Frank Braley with Renaud and Gautier Capuçon on Virgin Classics. Their well-filled
disc adds the two violin sonatas and the violin and cello sonata.
Roy Westbrook
Previous review:
Michael Cookson