Support us financially by purchasing this disc from |
|
|
|
|
Sergei PROKOFIEV (1891-1953)
The Year 1941, Op. 90 (Symphonic Suite) (1941) [15:01]
Symphony No 5 in B flat major, Op. 100 (1944) [44:47]
São Paulo Symphony Orchestra/Marin Alsop
rec. 26-31 August 2011, Sala São Paulo, Brazil
24-bit, 96 kHz. 5.1 Surround - DTS-HD Master Audio; 2.0 Stereo - PCM
NAXOS BD-A NBD0031 [59:48]
I reviewed
this disc in 2012 when it first appeared in CD format and was enthusiastic
about it though my colleague, Leslie Wright was less taken with it
(review).
Summarising my initial view of the performance of the symphony, which
hasn’t changed, Alsop seems to me to do pretty well in realising
both the power and the lyricism in Prokofiev’s writing. The
main climax of the movement, near the end, is done well and here,
as elsewhere, the orchestra plays very well for her. In a lively rendition
of the second movement I remain mildly troubled by the slow pacing
of the bridge passage to the trio but otherwise I enjoyed Ms Alsop’s
account of this movement. She also brings off the slow movement successfully,
balancing the lyricism that informs much of the music against the
moments when the skies darken. The generally high-spirited finale,
with its often brittle orchestration, is done with spirit and élan.
The coupling is something of a rarity: the three-movement orchestral
work, The Year 1941. The movements bear the titles ‘In
the Struggle’, ‘In the Night’ and ‘For the
Brotherhood of Man’. The piece, which I believe remains unpublished,
was new to me when I first heard the CD version of this release. I
don’t think it’s an unjustly neglected masterpiece but
it’s worth hearing, especially the central movement, much of
which is in the composer’s lyrical vein.
Back in 2012 my verdict on the recording of the Fifth Symphony was
as follows: ‘There are plenty of good recordings of this important
symphony in the catalogue but this newcomer ranks among the best I’ve
heard.’ I stand by that judgement, while reminding readers that
Leslie Wright was less taken with the performance. However, now that
the disc has been issued as a more expensive premium product, is it
as recommendable?
Overall, the sound is good. There’s presence and clarity and
the brass and percussion come over well without overpowering the rest
of the orchestra. However, I couldn’t detect a vast improvement
in the BD-A sound as compared with the CD. There is, I think, a bit
more bass definition in the BD-A sound but I got no greater sense
of space or of the acoustics of the hall as compared with the CD.
I’m not convinced that the extra outlay is justified. However,
it’s important to add the caveat that experience suggests that
different equipment and, indeed, different listening environments
often produce enhanced - or diminished - results. I think my equipment
produces good results for domestic listening but collectors with more
high-end kit may be able to extract more from this BD-A than I did.
All of which doesn’t make it easy to reach a verdict. If you
acquire this disc in CD format you’ll get an excellent version
of the symphony and an interesting filler with both works presented
in good sound. If you invest in the recording in BD-A then, heard
in isolation, it’s pretty good though not exceptional. However,
unless you have an urgent need to add Prokofiev’s Fifth to your
BD-A collection it may pay you to wait awhile to see which other recordings
- including, perhaps, reissues of the very fine Karajan or Gergiev
readings, mentioned by Leslie Wright - may come along in this format.
John Quinn
Previous reviews (CD): John
Quinn (September 2012 Recording of the Month) and Leslie
Wright
Masterwork Index: Prokofiev symphonies
|