Claudio Arrau (1903–1991) was an honoured guest in Boston – and in the Boston
Symphony’s summer home at Tanglewood. This disc presents two Tanglewood
performances from the early 1960s which, it appears, have not been issued
before. The recording of the Fourth concerto is in stereo while its companion
is in perfectly acceptable mono. The transfers were made in 2012 by Gene
Gaudette. The performance of the ‘Emperor’ is not to be confused with one
from 1957 in which Arrau and Munch took part and which has previously been
issued in a WHRA box (review).
The notes are very useful and informative though, perhaps, an interest should
be declared in that they are by my MusicWeb International colleague, Jonathan
Woolf. In his essay he suggests that, for Arrau, the ideal conductor of
the Fourth concerto would offer a collaboration that was “measured, spiritually
probing … almost intuitively intellectual and expressive.” Such a description
might not completely fit the often-volatile Charles Munch but here
the two great musicians seem to have forged a most effective partnership.
I found a great deal to admire in the first movement. Arrau may not be quite
as Olympian as, say, Gilels but he’s an extremely thoughtful interpreter
of one of Beethoven’s most philosophical concerto movements. It’s not a
note-perfect account – there is a tiny slip of the fingers at 9:07 and a
more serious one in the chords at 10:37 – but any such small slips can and
should be overlooked; what matters is that the spirit of the music
is so impressively conveyed. Munch’s conducting is excellent, as is the
playing of the BSO. Arrau gives a magisterial account of the cadenza.
In the elevated discourse of the slow movement we find Arrau cool and calm
and there’s good depth in the tone of the Boston strings. Both Arrau and
Munch are disciplined in their approach to the finale yet there is still
excellent energy in the music making. Jonathan Woolf says of Arrau that
in this movement “digital clarity and phrasal shaping are enviably assured.”
I concur.
For the ‘Emperor’ we find Arrau collaborating with a legendary concerto
accompanist in the shape of Pierre Monteux. After the opening flourish Le
Maitre drives the orchestral tutti along splendidly. When Arrau rejoins
the fray his playing is powerful and impressive and at times real thrust
is imparted to the music both from the keyboard and from the podium. That’s
not to say that the lyrical side of the movement is short changed; that’s
far from being the case. At the reprise of the opening flourish (12:32)
Arrau very briefly comes off the rails but it’s a momentary slip and his
authoritative reading is soon fully back on track.
I could sum up the slow movement in one word: patrician. Here we have two
vastly experienced musicians, both of whom have a deep understanding of
the music and a determination to put their skills completely at the service
of the music. Jonathan Woolf may be correct in saying that Arrau is “less
seraphic” in this movement by comparison with his studio recordings but
he suggests that the great pianist was even more expressive in this concert
account. There’s certainly no want of expression here and it’s
a highly satisfying reading. The finale is ebullient and surging. I like
the cheerful, lilting gait that Monteux and Arrau impart to the music. Throughout
the concerto Monteux obtains an excellent response from the Boston Symphony.
I found the sound of the piano slightly shallow in the Fourth concerto –
for example around 3:55 in the first movement – but this is by no means
an impediment to enjoyment. The sound for the Fifth concerto is fuller and
the piano seemed more prominent to me. Both recordings are perfectly satisfactory
and Gene Gaudette has done a good job in transferring them. There are several
studio recordings of both concertos by Arrau but notwithstanding that this
disc is an impressive and important addition to his discography.
John Quinn
An impressive and important addition to Claudio Arrau’s discography.
|
Support us financially
by purchasing this disc from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|