|
|
Support
us financially by purchasing this disc from: |
|
|
|
|
|
Krzysztof PENDERECKI
(b.1933)
The Symphonies and other Orchestral Works
Symphony No.11 (1973) [30:27]
Symphony No.2 1 Christmas (1980) [34:25]
Symphony No.3 1 (1988-1995) [44:24]
Symphony No.4 1 Adagio (1989) [30:42]
Symphony No.5 1 (1992) [37:37]
Symphony No.7 Seven Gates of Jerusalem2, 3 (1996)
[60:47]
Symphony No.8 Lieder der Vergänglichkeit2, 4
(2005) [36:28]
Aus den Psalmen Davids (1958) 2 [10:55]
Threnody for the Victims of Hiroshima for 52 Strings1
(1960) [8:56]
Fluorescences for orchestra1 (1961) [14:52]
Dies Irae2, 5 (1967) [25:22]
De Natura Sonoris II for Orchestra1 (1971) [8:59]
Olga Pasichnyk3; Aga Mikolaj3; Micaela Kaune4
(sopranos); Agnieszka Rehlis4; Ewa Marciniec3;
Anna Lubanska5 (mezzos); Wieslaw Ochman3;
Ryszard Minkiewicz5 (tenors); Wojtek Drabowicz4
(baritone); Jaroslàw Brek5 (bass-baritone); Romuald Tesarowicz3
(bass); Boris Carmeli3 (narrator)
National Polish Radio Symphony Orchestra (Katowice)/Antoni Wit 1;
The Warsaw National Philharmonic Choir and Orchestra/Antoni Wit
2
rec. Grzegorz Fitelberg Concert Hall, Katowice, Poland, 16 September
(De Natura); 28-29 September (Symphony No.3); 27 October
(Threnody); November 1998 (Fluorescences); 17-18
May (Symphony No.5); 25-26 June (Symphony No.1); 25-27 August (Symphony
No.2); 8-10 September 1999 (Symphony No.4); Warsaw, Philharmonic
Hall Poland: 18-20 November 2003 (Symphony No.7); 8, 9, 11 March
(Symphony No.8); 30-31 August (Dies Irae); 27, 29 November
2006 (Aus den Psalmen)
NAXOS 8.505231 [5 CDs: 77:25 + 68:06 + 65:14 + 60:47 + 72:45]
|
|
Sometimes it can be very rewarding to be presented with a tranche
of music by a major composer that you know not at all. That
has proved to be resoundingly the case with this five disc set
of “orchestral” works by Krzysztof Penderecki. I use the inverted
commas advisedly since two of the symphonies are really major
choral/vocal works to which the composer has almost arbitrarily
appended the title ‘Symphony’. Indeed in the case of the Seventh
Symphony this occurred only after its premiere as an oratorio.
As this is a review of the five disc set which includes all
Penderecki’s completed symphonies to date I propose reviewing
them in symphonic rather than disc order. Aside, from anything
else I found, as a listener new to this repertoire, it was informative
and interesting to chart Penderecki’s development in the 32
years covered by the seven main works.
Before considering individual works a few other umbrella comments.
All the performances are conducted by Antoni Wit who aside from
being a conductor of exceptional breadth and skill also studied
composition with Penderecki. I have no idea what Wit’s own compositions
are like but that fact alone must assure the listener that here
is an interpreter with a close and profound understanding of
what makes the composer ‘tick’.
Wit conducts two orchestras; the first three, purely orchestral,
discs are played by the National Polish Radio Symphony Orchestra
in Katowice whilst the final two choral symphonies are performed
by the combined forces of the Warsaw National Philharmonic Orchestra
and its associated choir. I will write more about the orchestras
later but suffice to say at this point that I have been greatly
impressed by the skill and dedication of both groups.
I was slightly surprised to realise that Volume 1 of this set
was recorded as long ago as 1998. In other words little more
than a decade after Naxos had entered the Classical Music marketplace
as a bargain basement label selling standard repertoire on carousels
in Woolworths, it was embarking on a major cycle of recordings
of this knotty stature. From the standpoint of another fifteen
or so years further on, this does not seem so remarkable but
I think it is important to mark just what a major artistic undertaking
this was and how triumphantly it has been achieved.
Special mention too for the technical teams involved. The three
Katowice discs were recorded and produced by the excellent Beata
Jankowska. Her name will be familiar to those who have collected
the critically acclaimed Mahler and Tchaikovsky Symphony cycles
again with Wit on Naxos as well as many other recordings too.
The former in particular will tax any engineer’s skills but
it has to be said that the complex textures and wide dynamic
range of the works presented here must have been as challenging
as any. Jankowska has produced discs that sound superb regardless
of any notional bargain price point.
Naxos, as is there wont with their boxed sets, have simply taken
the existing discs exactly as they are and put them in a cardboard
slip-case. The benefit for the collector is financial with the
five disc set available for around the £15.00 mark whilst the
same discs separately are about £6.50. So the set represents
roughly a 50% saving on the individual discs. There are other
recordings available – including some under the composer’s baton
– but I have not heard any of those so am not in a position
to make any comparative judgements.
Symphony No.1 dates from 1973 and was commissioned by
Perkins Engines of Peterborough England - still going strong
today. One rather wonders how many companies in recession-hit
2012 would consider such an investment even for a second. Yet
we should be profoundly grateful that they did since this prompted
or persuaded Penderecki onto a fruitful path.
Richard Whitehouse’s brief but very useful liner-note provides
excellent markers through the score for the first-time listener.
As will become clear, Penderecki underwent something of a musical
conversion between his first and second symphonies moving away
from the post-war Modernism of the 1950s and 1960s to embrace
something altogether more tonally-centred which has been labelled
‘neo-Romantic’. As ever, these labels can be as confusing as
they are enlightening. Suffice to say that the early works –
including the First Symphony - inhabit a world of unrepentantly
‘contemporary’ musical techniques where textures/sonorities
and gestures – rhythmic or harmonic - seem to take greater precedence
than the older values of form or melody. I use the word seem
with some care because Whitehouse usefully points out recurring
structural use of ‘A’ as a tonal centre and a walking string
line in the celli/bass parts that give the work formal coherence.
Certainly, it proves to be instantly engaging and for a half-hour
work played without a break one’s attention never wanders. That
being said, it is the textures and sounds Penderecki
draws from the large orchestra (triple wind, 5 horns, 3 trumpets,
4 trombones, tuba, 5 percussion, harp, celesta, harmonium and
piano plus strings) that resonate more than instantly perceivable
form or melody.
Having waited some forty years before tackling symphonic form
for the first time Penderecki wrote a Second Symphony
just over six years later. It was during those intervening six
years that Penderecki made the important compositional shift
from the essentially experimental to the neo-romantic. That
he started it on Christmas Eve 1979 might account for its occasional
subtitle - Christmas together with some fleeting rather
wan references to the carol Silent Night. It should
be noted that this title does not appear anywhere on the Schott
published score. Certainly it is not a work replete with "joy
to the world" inhabiting as it does a troubled and dark
emotional landscape into which brief flickers of familiar melody
end up casting as much shadow as they do light. Richard Whitehouse
provides another valuable note and he see this work as containing
presentiments of the strife suffered in Poland in the early
1980s with the brief success of the Solidarity Union. Whitehouse
characterises the work as a tribute to those who dared to challenge
the totalitarian State head-on.
By now Penderecki's musical vocabulary has become unrepentantly
neo-romantic and the music of this Symphony is more overtly
emotional than the earlier work. Certain Pendereckian symphonic
characteristics are beginning to appear already; a preference
for large single movement forms internally divided into more
traditional fast and slow sections is a key one. Symphony No.2
has three main sections which interestingly not only follow
a rough symphonic form but at the same time mimic a basic sonata-form
of exposition, development and recapitulation completed with
a final coda. The orchestra used is similar to the Symphony
No.1 requiring just one less percussionist and no piano or harmonium.
The sound Penderecki now draws from the players is quite different;
more weighty and certainly fuller.
Again, great praise to both players and the technical team for
a recording of wide range and telling detail. The brass have
some formidably demanding parts to play and they sound as impressive
as they are exciting. Central to the emotional impact of the
work is a brass-led alleluia figure that comes towards the close
of the opening exposition section [track 3 2:19]. Although no
reference as such is indicated, to me this has the spirit of
an ancient Polish knight's prayer very similar in its
emotional impact to that used by Panufnik in his Sinfonia
Sacra.
Penderecki's command of symphonic form is again displayed
when it becomes apparent that this hymnic phrase is derived
from the work's opening material. Further emotional and
musical resolution is found with the return of the alleluia
near the work's close [track 5 3:35] although this potentially
exultant ending is soured by an immediate descent into an abyss
of growling low brass and insistent timpani pedal notes which
at last dissipates to allow a final haltingly insecure reference
to Silent Night. The symphony ends - borrowing Whitehouse's
ideal description - in a mood of pensive resignation. Another
impressively powerful work receiving what seems to be a wholly
convincing performance.
The Third Symphony did not appear in its final form until
1995 although the final two movements appeared as a separate
piece at a festival in Lucerne in 1988. Still searching for
a definitively personal symphonic form Penderecki moved on from
the overtly neo-romantic 2nd Symphony to a style that sought
to synthesise elements of both the old and the challengingly
new. The Third Symphony is a big piece in every sense. Its five
movements last nearly forty-five minutes and Penderecki has
expanded his orchestra - still with triple wind - to include
a fourth (bass) trumpet and fourth trombone but now with an
even larger percussion section requiring nine players. More
impressive than its sheer physical scale is the assured way
in which Penderecki has fused traditional elements of the multi-movement
symphony with his own distinct musical and aesthetic language.
Even more than in the earlier works the virtuosity of individual
players in the ever-excellent Katowice orchestra is apparent;
special praise for the lead trumpeter in the extended, twisted
and convoluted 2nd movement solo [track 2 00:30]. Demonstration-worthy
engineering ensures that every strand of this complex and weighty
score registers.
While having written a stern work often heavy with foreboding
Penderecki seems to have thrown off the sheer weight of melancholy
that pervaded the Second Symphony. By dividing it into five
distinct movements the perception is of a greater emotional
range allowing more light and shade. The opening Andante
con moto emerges from the shadowy depths where an obsessively
repeating string pedal provides the base from which instrumental
figures grope upwards. Lasting less than four minutes this has
the sense of a prelude or preamble preparing the musical stage
for the drama to follow. The relative calm is dispersed in a
flurry of strenuous string and timpani activity that opens the
second movement Allegro con brio. Pitted against this
maelstrom are various solo instrumental cadenzas and short gestures.
Gradually the strings are replaced by competing tuned percussion
motifs. Excessive percussion writing can often seem rather vacant
and intent on making noise for noise's sake but here
both in intention and execution the effect is utterly compelling.
The movement is driven unrelentingly forward until we reach
a cor anglais cadenza of uneasy pastoral calm - again cruelly
written but stunningly played. The movement closes over tolling
bells and a reminiscence of the work’s opening low string figure.
This prepares the ground for the central Adagio. Here
Penderecki achieves a relative peace that has eluded him in
his symphonic writing until now. Long lyrical string lines weave
in and out of contrasting wind figures over a bed of long-held
string pedals and tubular bell rolls. Near the movement's
central point the calm is shattered by an eruptive brass statement
leaving the strings shuddering with shocked tremolandi. This
subsides as quickly as it emerged and the lyrical dialogues
resume. The obsessive aggressive repeated low D that opens the
fourth movement Passacaglia is - as described in the
liner - severe and ominous. Little wonder that film director
Martin Scorsese used this passage for part of his recent powerfully
oppressive Shutter Island. One assumes that the passacaglia
of the title is often unheard since many of the solo passages
are just that and have no accompaniment which would 'contain'
the harmonic fabric implied by the title. Instead continuity
is provided by the near ever-present pedal Ds and more quietly
insistent yet understated bells which seem to gain significance
within the work's structure as it progresses.
The closing Vivace movement revisits obsessively the
idea of pulsating low ostinati based on small melodic cells.
This time there is an unwavering driving pace to the music which
gives it a toccata-like quality. As with much of the symphony,
if one were able to give a tonal character it would be minor
key. Again solo cadenzas sit on a bed of orchestral texture
yet where previously these were essentially static in this movement
the underlying character is one of action. A central panel of
the movement has instruments working in pairs either alone or
in juxtaposition with other pairs. Gradually the momentum regains
the energy that opened the movement. This is maintained - with
a variety of dynamic and scale - for most of the remainder of
the work. From 9:30 the heavy brass joins and gradually the
music builds in power and pitch centres - gaining height from
the depths in which it has been gravitating to a rather perplexing
and abrupt slowing of the pace into the final soured major key
gesture with which it ends. Having listened several times to
the piece I still find this ending rather unconvincing especially
given the power of most of what has come before.
The Fourth Symphony - coupled here with the 2nd Symphony
- was composed and received its premiere in 1989 thereby actually
predating its predecessor. It was written as a commission to
mark the bicentennial of French Revolution. Again Penderecki
uses the single movement divided into five distinct parts. The
subtitle "Adagio" is somewhat misleading since one
could not say that the music is predominantly slow. The scale
is reduced - lasting just over half an hour. There’s a smaller
orchestra - similar wind and brass but with a smaller percussion
section and no 'extras' like celesta or piano
or even harp. There is a group of three off-stage trumpets which
adds an extra theatricality. By now "Pendereckian"
gestures are becoming more familiar - accompanied cadenzas and
a generally sombre indeed pessimistic mood pervade. Certainly
this is not music that offers easy solutions or 'happy
endings' for the listener. This symphony has the feel
of a work concerned more with a journey harbouring little or
no expectation of an arrival. Other commentators have evoked
Shostakovich's shade when discussing Penderecki and much
of the time I feel this is a very generalised comment at best
and at worst misleading - to neither composer's benefit.
Yet the bassoon recitative in this symphony's 3rd movement
(track 8 8:30) does indeed evoke the shell-shocked
grieving of the older composer's finest work.
As ever, and perhaps superfluously by now, praise to the orchestra
for some wonderfully expressive solos. Indeed this proves to
be one of the most compelling movements in this cycle so far
- quite literally at the heart of both this work and the seven
symphonies as they currently exist. Another Pendereckian finger-print
fugato follows - awkward and angular filled with obsessive unsettled
energy. Beata Jankowska creates another typically well-managed
sound-stage with the percussion convincingly placed and the
wealth of instrumental detail registering with exceptional clarity,
The offstage trumpets manically chase and echo their onstage
counterparts. The closing section revisits elements of the wind
soliloquies and remnants of the string fugatos with ghostly
trumpet fanfares. The music unwinds and fades away into a unison
before silence. No closure again but more compelling than the
end of No.3.
Barely another two years passed before Penderecki started on
his Fifth Symphony - does the number explain the rhythmic
use of Beethoven’s “fate” motif I wonder? - commissioned this
time to mark the 50th Anniversary of the independence
of Korea from Japan. This is the last of the instrumental symphonies
– No.6 is elusively described as “in progress”. There’s a ingle
movement form again the use of a large orchestra with quadruple
wind this time with an additional 4 trumpets in the hall. That
said there are ‘only’ four percussionists. Within the percussion
group Penderecki does stipulate what might be termed some Eastern
instruments but their presence could not be said to colour the
compositional choices made. It did occur to me that he occasionally
uses bells or gongs to mark musical paragraphs in the way Tibetan
temple bells mark the start of a new period of prayer or meditation.
Naxos have chosen not to divide the sections of the
work. This which plays continuously for a full 37 minutes even
though, paradoxically, the sub-divided ‘movements’ are more
clearly defined – even on a first listen – than some of the
earlier works.
Penderecki rarely – if ever – in the symphonies requires the
extended performance techniques of his orchestra that in many
ways define his earlier orchestral works. For sure the music
is complex and often very demanding indeed to play but he does
ask for non-standard modes of playing. That said, in this symphony
he returns to the juxtaposing of material, harmonic, rhythmic
or melodic, that harks back to the First Symphony and indeed
to earlier works. So the opening takes a harshly repeated single
note and contrasts it with a falling melodic line which is in
turn contrasted with a rising melodic line. The first five minutes
seem to lay out the musical material of the piece for inspection
and while not strictly cyclical Penderecki does return to this
basic fabric repeatedly. Around the five minute mark the violas
lead off a violently aggressive fugal passage. This is impressive
both as played and as written. Again as seems to be the norm
with Penderecki this conveys a very serious, almost intellectual
rigour without adding much in the way of emotion. Richard Whitehouse
in the liner-notes refers to a “Shostakovich-like irony” in
the handling of the central section of the work. I must admit
that this eludes me mainly because Penderecki never allows the
underlying mood to vary from the sobriety of his preferred style.
Without ‘lightness’ – sincere or satirical - there is little
contextual room for irony. For me the power of Penderecki’s
writing comes from the cumulative, unwavering preference for
what in other hands might seem like a limited emotional palette.
This staunch refusal to relax an iron grip on the music means
that when very occasionally a ray of light does pierce the gloom
it is as surprising as it is welcome. Very briefly, like a false
dawn, there is an intriguing passage which seems to echo Nielsen’s
Helios Overture but the hope it might represent is
extinguished almost as soon as it is expressed. A return of
the fugal/scherzo material leads to the mightiest climax of
the work near the thirty minute point. As ever the Katowice
brass are massively impressive.
I’m not sure exciting is the right word but this is music of
exceptional power and impact. The closing pages revisit fragments
and elements of the music that has already been explored and
expanded upon. More exceptional work from the oboe and cor anglais
in particular mark another of Penderecki’s favoured cadenza-soliloquies.
Just as the assumption is made that the work will close with
a sense of repose a last vehement string outburst echoes the
hammered repetition of the opening albeit on a different pitch
centre as if to reinforce the impression of ‘not-quite-cyclical’.
Even on my brief knowledge and acquaintance with this music
I found this work to be initially knotty but increasingly impressive.
By the time Wit came to record the last two symphonies he had
moved on to become the Managing and Artistic Director of the
Warsaw Philharmonic so no surprise that they should feature
as the chosen orchestra. A different technical team; Andrzej
Sasin and Aleksandra Nagórko were given the task of committing
these very large-scale works to disc. Sasin was on the desk
for the recording by these same forces of Janácek’s Glagolitic
Mass which impressed me less than other reviewers. No complaints
this time – the forces Penderecki deploys are vast even by his
standards; 5 soloists (2 sopranos) plus narrator and a large
choir - the score states 3 choirs and indeed 3 separate ones
took part in the first performance. There’s a huge orchestra
with again quadruple wind and brass, including the rare bass
trumpet, piano, celesta and organ plus strings. Twelve percussion
are split into four groups. The icing on the instrumental cake
is an off-stage instrumental group of another 4 clarinets and
4 bassoons, 4 horns, 3 trumpets, 4 trombones and tuba. Curiously,
as is often the case in Penderecki’s work, the listener is not
often overwhelmed by the sheer scale and power of the writing.
The number of instruments is more to allow a variety of texture
and spatial presentation rather than simple full-frontal assault.
All credit to the technical team who provide a sound picture
combining clarity and well-defined positioning as well as power
when required. My one little query is whether the choir has
the sheer numbers available to match the few occasions they
are pitted against the full orchestra. For all the good work
of the engineers they are rather swamped.
Richard Whitehouse again supplies the liner. He sees the work
as representing a fusion or confluence of the twin threads of
choral and symphonic composition. Hence the equivocation between
its original description as an ‘Oratorio’ and the later appending
of the title ‘Symphony No.7’ when it received its Polish
premiere. The Symphony/Oratorio is sub-titled The Seven
Gates of Jerusalem. Although there are eleven gates
in the walls of the old city as built by Suleiman
the Magnificent only seven are open with the eighth being
reserved – in Hebrew tradition – for the Messiah. No real surprise
therefore that “7” takes on a structural quasi-ritualistic significance
in this work. There are seven movements and 7-note phrases and
motifs bind the structure. Much as these motifs impose themselves
on the listener even on initial acquaintance there is another
quality that separates this work from the preceding symphonies:
radiance. Penderecki allows light into this score in a way that
has been conspicuously absent before. For sure it is still an
often stark indeed gaunt work but critically the presence of
soprano voices, both in the choir and as soloists, alone or
duetting, lifts the weight of stark sobriety that has marked
many of the earlier works. An example of this is that it opens
with a firmly unison C and closes with a sustained unclouded
and unequivocal held chord of E. This is quite without the harmonic
ambiguity that shrouds/defines the other symphonies.
The singing is uniformly excellent – perhaps the choir sopranos
“splash” a couple of their entries but overall it is impassioned
and committed singing. If that is true of the choir it is even
more so of the soloists. The fact that four of the five are
native Poles - soprano Olga Pasichnyk is Ukrainian - gives both
the sound they make and style a thoroughly idiomatic feel. My
only gripe is the Naxos standard practice of making the text
only available online – for the sake of another page in the
booklet I don’t want to have to print off a sheet that won’t
then fit in the jewel case or box. For those willing to have
a computer to hand while listening Penderecki’s publisher Schott
offer a major bonus. The entire score can be viewed as a scrollable
pdf. With such a rich and complex score it is fascinating
to see how the parts on the page translate into sound. Penderecki’s
great skill here – and in many of his other vocal works in particular
– is to achieve a fusion of ancient and modern. The musical
vocabulary is patently ‘modern’ yet its animating spirit is
ancient and timeless. Much of the music seems ritualistic and
potent with extra-musical meaning. Much of the text is taken
from the Psalms with the rest excerpts from the Old Testament.
The first and last movements frame the work with imposing music
of considerable impact and a spirit of some grand pontifical
procession. The writing is monolithic and spare in its use of
textures or contrapuntal writing. What we hear are blocks of
sound/instrumentation set in opposition to each other. The second
and fourth movements make prominent use of the repeated 7 note
phrase alongside other Pendereckian gestures of slowly descending
scalic figures in the strings as well as throbbing timpani.
The presence of five soloists, as with so much of this work,
seems rather luxurious since none have overly large roles but
Penderecki uses them to telling effect. The second soprano in
the second movement Si oblitus fuero tui, Jerusalem
is a highlight. The third movement De profundis is
set for the choir alone. I did wonder if there was just a hint
of caution in the singing that robbed it of the hushed intensity
the writing would seem to demand. By its nature it is horribly
exposed writing and the choir are very fine but in my mind’s
ear I could imagine it even better. The first four movements
are all self-contained whilst the final three run together.
The framing music of the 5th Gate Lauda Jerusalem
is the only sustained scherzo-like music in the work. Antiphonal
percussion groups are the driving force behind an exciting toccata-like
movement. Again the sopranos prove a little fallible in ‘pinging’
out high-lying notes from nowhere but this does not unduly detract
from the music-making. This is the longest single section of
the work – running to over seventeen minutes with two toccata-scherzo
sections framing a pastoral central panel featuring some beautiful
orchestral playing. An extended horn solo in particular lingers
in the memory. The penultimate gate is striking for the introduction
of a sepulchrally-voiced narrator sounding rather like one imagines
an Old Testament prophet did haranguing the cowed masses. The
instrumentation here is very striking with static string and
brass chords punctuated by percussion gestures marking out the
sections. The ‘only’ melodic material is given to the previously
mentioned bass trumpet which is meant to represent the voice
of God. At the climax of the movement the choir enters with
the seventh and final gate which builds impressively featuring
the entire performing group who revisit material both literary
and musical from earlier in the work. Apart from a muted section
towards the end the work closes with the powerful affirmation
in bright E major.
The celebratory nature of the work – written to mark Jerusalem’s
3rd Millenium – dictates the impractical near-profligate
scale of the writing. You can imagine programme planners having
nervous breakdowns trying to stage this work; at ‘just’ an hour
long it’s too short for an entire concert but what on earth
to programme with it. I suspect a modicum of logistic pragmatism
has robbed this performance of the extra choral forces that
would have made this recording even more impressive than it
is – which, to be honest, is pretty impressive. Again a major
feather in the Naxos cap for making music of this complex quality
available in such a fine and affordable recording.
So to the Eighth and last - to date - Symphony
… or perhaps not. The performance on this disc is of the original
2005 score consisting of twelve song settings lasting around
36 minutes. Referring to Schott's site reveals - they
provide another online viewable score - a 2007 revision. This
adds a further three songs and apparently extends the running
time by nearly twenty minutes. As and when Naxos decide to record
this revision time will tell. What is unclear is whether this
'original' version is still deemed legitimate
or has been superseded by the expanded revision. Curiously Schott's
site lists this Naxos recording without making any mention of
this question of edition. Obviously, my comments relate to the
original version as recorded here.
From the very opening bars it is clear that Penderecki has reinvented
his compositional persona once again. This work has few if any
of the epic gestures of the 7th Symphony. Also there are - until
the closing sections - few of what I might term typically Pendereckian
gestures. Texts again are available on-line only. The feel,
for want of a better description is of post-modern-impressionism.
By choosing to set, in their original language, Romantic German
poets the composer creates a parallel with works such as Zemlinsky's
Lyric Symphony albeit refracted through a lens of a
contemporary music idiom. The scoring too is more pointillist
and subdued. Likewise, most of the movements are brief. Only
the twelfth and last breaks the five minute barrier. Although
Penderecki uses a substantial orchestra - again it is not clear
from the Schott's listing whether the instrumentation
was expanded during the revision - its use is carefully controlled.
Only in the final movement is it for the first time that all
three soloists, choir and orchestra join forces. The title translates
as "Songs of Transience" and indeed muted regret and
loss do permeate the music. Penderecki consciously seems to
focus more on lyrical beauty of lines. The performers are once
again excellent. Two of the three soloists took part in the
world premiere. The one who didn't, soprano Michaela
Kaune, is fearlessly brave in her tackling of the angular and
widely spaced lines. The Warsaw Philharmonic Choir are in fine
form too. Listen to the very end of the work; an extraordinary
effect with the choir executing a slow controlled glissando
slide upwards disappearing into the musical mist. In this original
version I like very much the way the full forces are saved for
this final movement. In the revision the ‘new’ 3rd
movement is a setting of Brecht which uses all the vocal forces.
Penderecki returns to some of his more characteristic traits
as though telling us that for all the experimentation earlier
this indeed is his ‘true’ self. The agitated string lines conform,
his presence as do the last of his cadenza-soliloquies here
again allocated to the garrulous bass trumpet which made such
a sonic impact in the previous symphony. Overall, this is the
most overtly beautiful and reflective of the cycle.
One of the things Naxos got right early on was the appropriateness
and interest, as well as value, of the couplings. So it is with
these discs. Three of the five contain symphonies alone. The
remaining two have very valuable couplings. The earliest of
those is the 1958 Aus den Psalmen Davids which
is one of the works accompanying the 8th Symphony.
This setting of four Psalms is palpably early. The instrumental
group of two pianos and eight percussion echoes Stravinsky and
even Orff yet with seeds of the mature composer already evident.
There is particularly strong singing from the Warsaw choir here.
The contrast to the late symphony could barely be greater and
as such makes for a fascinating coupling.
Sandwiched between the two is a setting of the Dies Irae
from roughly a decade later before Penderecki had embraced neo-Romanticism.
Again for a short(ish) work Penderecki requires a large orchestra:
at least 3, often 4 wind and brass of each instrument, 8 percussion,
harmonium and piano. The strings are represented by cellos and
basses alone perhaps to emphasise the “de profundis” nature
of the work. Having made the journey with Penderecki through
his symphonies I must admit to finding his earlier incarnation
less appealing but this is a starkly atmospheric work with voices
appearing out of the musical gloom. Penderecki makes far greater
use of extended vocal techniques in this work with the chorus
muttering obsessively and clustered chords set in opposition
to explosive orchestral gestures. Again, the technical team
have to be praised for the clarity the recording has from the
faintest swish of a tam-tam to great walls of apocalyptic brass.
As musical theatre these are undoubtedly high-impact effects,
perhaps reflecting Penderecki’s other great interest in music
for the stage. However how lasting these make the music I’m
not so sure. Certainly, from a viewpoint of barely 45 years
later this kind of ‘cutting-edge’ modernism seems rather dated
now. Interesting in placing the composer on an evolutionary
path but of less enduring worth than much of his later music.
The earliest instrumental work included in this set is the famous
Threnody for the Victims of Hiroshima for 52 Strings.
With such an evocative and indeed emotive title I was interested
to read that Penderecki considered initially titling it rather
baldly – in the style of Cage – 8’37”. Which rather begs the
question of what we as listeners ‘expect’ of a piece on the
strength of its title alone. Penderecki in the liner is quoted
as saying it was only after the first live performance that
he perceived the emotional charge in the work which caused him
to “search around” for an association before alighting on the
current title. Coming to the work hard on the heels of the later
symphonies is something of a shock – and in the reverse way
to his first supporters who felt his move to neo-romanticism
‘betrayed’ this earlier aesthetic. Putting to one side the title
– which I feel can blur the original aim of the work - this
is a classic example of contemporary composition from the late
1950s into the early 1960s. On a structural level it juxtaposes
the opposites of total freedom: chance or aleatoric techniques
with the very controlled demands of serial composition. More
immediately striking is his use of string sonority; one might
say anti-sonority since this work is a study in making non-typical
string sounds on stringed instruments. What lifts the work away
from the great mass of the music of this period is that Penderecki
– whether by accident, as it would seem from the above quote,
or design allowed an emotional element to invade the music.
I have seen other reviews that prefer the composer’s own recording
on EMI. I cannot make that judgement not having heard it but
this would seem to be a committed performance in its own right.
The irony is that in seeking to break free of the traditions
of both composition and performance works such as the Threnody
and indeed the other two fillers here created a new brand of
avant-garde formalism that was as hard to break free from as
the earlier one had been. Witness the fury within the contemporary
music community that Penderecki’s first forays into more ‘traditional’
styles provoked.
Fluorescences dates from a year after the Threnody
and expands the field of sonorities and instrumental textures
available by writing for the kind of large orchestra that typifies
the later symphonic works. When I say large orchestra in this
case I mean quadruple wind, six horns, four trumpets, three
trombones and two tubas, six percussion including a typewriter
and siren, piano and strings. Post-Satie I am not sure I can
ever take a score which contains sirens and typewriters wholly
seriously. The liner writer – Mieczslaw Tomaszewski – sees this
as an attempt to move beyond “the sphere of musical sound into
that of purely acoustic phenomena known from the modern world
at large”. Penderecki wrote in the concert programme for the
first performance: “In this composition, all I am interested
in is liberating sound beyond all tradition.” Certainly it has
the feel of Musique concrète transcribed for orchestra.
Whether or not this style of composition appeals will depend
on just how interesting and engaging you find such experiments
in orchestral timbres. Personally they pass me by except on
a level of having my curiosity piqued as to how any particular
sound is generated. This is not a work I can ever imagine feeling
‘in the mood’ for ever again. It is only fair to praise the
huge dynamic range of the recording and the precision, as far
as one can tell, and commitment of the playing.
The final work is De Naturis Sonoris II which
dates from a full decade later – much closer to the stylistic
schism. Certainly one can hear this as a way-station between
the experiments in sonority alone of the early works and the
music written from the 2nd Symphony onwards. The
writing is less self-consciously sensational/effect-driven although
still dominated by musical gestures born of extended playing
techniques.
Naxos has now produced some 18 or so discs of Penderecki’s orchestral
and choral works. This shows a stunning commitment to the music
of a major contemporary composer. I was trying to form an opinion
of which work impressed me the most and then realised that it
was the work I was currently listening to. This is music that
makes demands of both the listeners and certainly the players.
I am not sure I could categorise it as ‘enjoyable’ as such but
rewarding and fascinating and richly inventive for sure. In
fact it is exactly the kind of music that needs to be available
on disc to allow the listener to penetrate its complex depths
over time and repeated playings. Many the composer who laments
being able to have his music easily available to the general
listening public and when it is rarely can it be found in performances
as convincing and dedicated as those here.
An artistic statement of impressive intent and compelling execution.
Nick Barnard
|
|