Wilhelm Kempff made two LP cycles of the concertos, the first 
                  with van Kempen, with whom he was much associated on disc, and 
                  the second with Leitner. In addition, he made a pre-war 78 recording 
                  of the Emperor Concerto in Berlin with Raabe, and the 
                  Third and Fourth concertos with van Kempen. Both LP cycles have 
                  their adherents and I wouldn’t be without either, though 
                  sonically the mono van Kempen invariably cedes to the Leitner 
                  in that respect. In artistic terms, things are very much more 
                  even. 
                    
                  Now here is a live, ancillary boxed collection of the concertos 
                  performed in April 1970 in Tokyo, which therefore post-dates 
                  the stereo Leitner cycle. It has things in its favour. The NHK 
                  was in very much better form now than it had been in the 1950s 
                  and even the earlier 1960s when it was still a shaky ensemble. 
                  The stereo broadcast quality is perfectly reasonable. Kempff 
                  plays with fluency and poetry. But there are also the inevitable 
                  corollaries of live performance, and balancing: the percussion, 
                  for instance, is aggressively recorded. Though there is clarity 
                  and grandeur in the Emperor and a classicist reserve 
                  in the slow movement, one senses Kempff tiring in the finale 
                  where he makes some small slips. I suspect that this is because 
                  he had just played the G major concerto as well that evening. 
                  Two days earlier he had actually performed the first three concertos 
                  in one concert. This was the kind of thing that wunderkind violinists 
                  used to do to show off their stamina in the 1930s, but I wonder 
                  if it was reasonable to expect Kempff to do it. 
                    
                  That G major performance seems less impressive than Kempff’s 
                  usual high standard. He gets through the slow movement quite 
                  briskly - in Berlin with Leitner he had been a full minute slower 
                  and in this compact movement that’s a telling difference. 
                  Worse, the results are curiously inexpressive for this most 
                  poetic of players. Was he unsettled? The C minor is a good, 
                  solid Kempff performance with, as usual, his own cadenza in 
                  the opening movement. The slow movement is refined, the finale 
                  emphatic. Tadashi Mori (1921-87) was a good orchestral trainer 
                  but from these results not the most thoughtful or poetic of 
                  conductors. 
                    
                  The highest level of hiss comes in the First Concerto, but this 
                  performance has freshness and enthusiasm (because it was the 
                  first to be performed, maybe?). His lyricism and refined touch 
                  are heard at their best here and in the Second Concerto. 
                    
                  This is a valuable souvenir of Kempff in Tokyo, a country he 
                  loved and where he, too, was much loved, and esteemed. Clearly 
                  it can’t stand in the company of the two studio cycles, 
                  which means it’s strictly for completists. The sleeve 
                  notes, by the way, are only in Japanese. 
                    
                  Jonathan Woolf   
                  
                  Masterwork Index: Beethoven 
                  piano concertos