This hour-long documentary DVD, which I assume was made for 
                  television, is one of two on Carlos Kleiber to have been released 
                  recently. The other is a film by Eric Schulz, ten or so minutes 
                  longer than this one, and released by Arthaus Musik [101 553 
                  - review]. 
                  
                    
                  The director of this C Major production is Georg Wübbolt 
                  and his direction ensures that whilst most of the witnesses 
                  are laudatory not a few are puzzled by Kleiber the man, and 
                  in one instance dismissive of aspects of his personality. Clearly 
                  he was not an easy man. The story of his predilection for ‘Geishas’ 
                  was long known, but his appetites in general, not merely the 
                  sexual appetite, seemed to some dilatory or merely capricious. 
                  This documentary hardly resolves the dilemma of Kleiber, who 
                  seems to have been in thrall to the memory of his meticulous 
                  father Erich for much of his life, but it does paint a portrait 
                  of sorts of a man whose complexities were at least partially 
                  fathomable. 
                    
                  One interviewee, possibly significantly a woman, notes with 
                  a certain distaste that ‘he made fools of people, which 
                  wasn’t nice’. The element of caprice was certainly 
                  strong, the demands both unreasonable but in some cases - especially 
                  rehearsal time - not wholly unreasonable. But there was also 
                  a meticulous, almost hyper-sensitive quality too; he would refuse 
                  to conduct the second act of an opera because he feared that 
                  he’d failed in the first act; he had to be reassured, 
                  like a child, cajoled, pushed, almost thrust back on, but often 
                  he simply left anyway, and went home. 
                    
                  Kleiber’s mother was Jewish and the family left Germany 
                  in 1935, after the Nazis took power. They journeyed to South 
                  America where Erich - whom Michael Gielen calls ‘The Commander’ 
                  and Wolfgang Sawallisch calls a ‘Dictator’ - was 
                  busy conducting. There is a good amount of film of Erich conducting; 
                  a small, compact man, with hooded unblinking eyes, directing 
                  orchestras with short, unostentatious, businesslike gestures. 
                  He was everything that his son Carlos wasn’t. He was controlled, 
                  prepared, and in charge. Whereas things seemed to be in control 
                  of Carlos, whose stream of consciousness conducting, arms windmilling 
                  in an agony of desire in Rosenkavalier, suggests an out-of-body 
                  compact with the music that his father would never have countenanced. 
                  But Carlos, when not boring orchestras with his finicky explanations, 
                  often poetic in the extreme - nothing is guaranteed to annoy 
                  an orchestral musician more than non-specific verbiage - was 
                  also something that his father was not; he was funny. A rehearsal 
                  extract demonstrates that he could make the musicians laugh, 
                  and ensure collaboration through complicity, not as his father 
                  had done, by bludgeoning the musicians. 
                    
                  We hear from many musicians; Riccardo Muti talks admiringly 
                  of Kleiber, in English; we also hear from Ileana Cotrubas, Peter 
                  Jonas, and Otto Schenck and Kleiber’s doctor Otto Staindl 
                  are also enjoyably encountered. Ioan Holender speaks with a 
                  certain patrician hauteur. Most agree he conducted too little, 
                  but was paid an awful lot. We also hear from Kleiber himself, 
                  in a 1960 NDR radio interview. His letters are read in English 
                  voiceover, not very well, but which nevertheless supplies a 
                  real need since he was had an almost pathological aversion to 
                  journalists, and thus interviews. 
                    
                  Toward the end of his life his repertoire had dwindled to almost 
                  nothing, as had his concert-giving, his fee for one famous one-off 
                  concert in 1996 being a new sports car. He retreated to Slovenia, 
                  birthplace of his ballerina wife, to die alone, his body undiscovered 
                  for a day or so. And yet I’m sure it can be argued, though 
                  this documentary doesn’t seek to argue the case, that 
                  Kleiber achieved his own degree of resolution. His childhood 
                  had been fractured, his first language naturally German (Karl) 
                  but his youth requiring him (Carlos) to be multi-lingual. There 
                  are hints that both his parents killed themselves. Erich denigrated 
                  his early conducting attempts, and Carlos came late to music. 
                  It was something of a small miracle in fact that he achieved 
                  independence from so powerfully centrifugal a force as Erich. 
                  
                    
                  In the end this documentary raises more questions than answers. 
                  Carlos was a sensualist, money-conscious but not apparently 
                  status-obsessed, an indifferent pianist but a master conductor 
                  - one whose need for a singing and expressive narrative sense 
                  in his conducting set him apart. He was so good an opera conductor 
                  not because his repertoire was so small, but because he knew 
                  the score inside out. His tortured sense of inadequacy perhaps 
                  sprang from hearing too often and too loudly the admonishing 
                  words of his ruthless father: the fewer works he conducted, 
                  and the better he knew them, the less often he would hear his 
                  father’s posthumous scorn. Or maybe it was something else 
                  entirely. Until there is a biography perhaps we will never truly 
                  know. 
                    
                  Jonathan Woolf