Some months ago I reviewed 
                  a disc of music by Mahler from this same conductor and orchestra. 
                  Their programme included ‘Totenfeier’, the original version 
                  of the first movement of Mahler’s Second Symphony. I’m afraid 
                  I was rather underwhelmed by the performance and, indeed, by 
                  the whole disc but even so I was interested to see what Paavo 
                  Järvi would make of the complete symphony. 
                  
                  The first movement gets off to a good, solid start. However, 
                  when Mahler eases into a slower, more reflective episode (2:34 
                  - 3:35) Järvi adopts a dangerously expansive tempo and the same 
                  happens in a more extended similar episode a little later on 
                  (6:12–9:30). In fairness, this is entirely consistent with his 
                  approach to the same stretches of the ‘Totenfeier’ movement, 
                  so one shouldn’t be surprised. However, as was the case on the 
                  earlier disc, I think he sacrifices too much tension in these 
                  passages. Much of the movement is perfectly satisfactory but 
                  these passages are just too much of a good thing, I think. In 
                  the last analysis I didn’t feel stirred by this reading of Mahler’s 
                  massive funeral march. 
                  
                  At the very start of II the little agogic distortions that Mahler 
                  writes into the score are, perhaps, observed a little too fully 
                  by the conductor but overall Järvi’s treatment of this movement 
                  is a success. He obtains some nice delicate playing from the 
                  orchestra and I enjoyed the reading, even if there were a few 
                  occasions when I felt he was just a bit too inclined to stress 
                  small expressive points little excessively. There are more instances 
                  of deft playing in III and the thunderous premonition of the 
                  finale (7:52 - 8:28) is suitably shattering. Alice Coote makes 
                  a predictably fine showing in ‘Urlicht’, offering well-focused 
                  and expressive singing. She’s well supported by Järvi. 
                  
                  The massive finale is proficiently played. However, as with 
                  the first movement, I didn’t feel as stirred by the music as 
                  I would expect to be – and as other conductors have achieved 
                  in my experience. Mahlerians such as Simon Rattle (his Birmingham 
                  recording) or Otto Klemperer offer so much more and dig so much 
                  deeper into the drama, I feel. As I’m unsure if this Järvi recording 
                  is a studio one or made live – there’s no audience noise that 
                  I could hear - I’ve deliberately refrained from comparisons 
                  with a live recording such as the extraordinary, visionary Tennstedt 
                  traversal (review) 
                  because there one is in an entirely different league emotionally. 
                  
                  
                  Even though Järvi’s account of the finale doesn’t really grip 
                  me there’s much to admire in the playing. The percussion section, 
                  powerfully reported by the engineers, play incisively and the 
                  brass are excellent. At the grosse Appell the solo flute 
                  sounds really bird-like. I’m not quite sure why a choir was 
                  brought all the way from Spain to Frankfurt to take part in 
                  this recording but the members of Orfeón Donostiarra justify 
                  their involvement with some very good singing. Their first entry 
                  (20:32) is hushed almost to the point of inaudibility and as 
                  the final stretch of the finale unfolds they demonstrate their 
                  worth at all volume levels. When the choir and soloists sing 
                  ‘Aufersteh’n, ja aufersteh’n wirst du’ at full volume (32:50) 
                  the Spanish singers – the tenors especially – really go for 
                  it. In the vocal part of the finale Alice Coote acquits herself 
                  very well once more. She’s joined by Natalie Dessay. This isn’t 
                  repertoire with which I’d normally associate this singer but 
                  she makes a good contribution. The final pages are impressive, 
                  with the organ a telling presence: some may feel, however, that 
                  the bells are a little reminiscent of Boris Godounov. 
                  
                  
                  This recording of Mahler’s Second has much to commend it. The 
                  quality of the singing and playing is high and the recorded 
                  sound is good. However, I don’t think that Paavo Järvi’s vision 
                  of the score is sufficiently compelling to raise this performance 
                  from being a decent one to a distinguished one. The Resurrection 
                  Symphony is a hugely theatrical work and it should thrill 
                  and move the listener; this performance doesn’t achieve that. 
                  There are umpteen versions of this symphony in the catalogue. 
                  Tony Duggan has evaluated several in his survey 
                  of recordings of the Mahler symphonies and, from personal experience, 
                  I’d endorse his enthusiasm for several of the versions he mentions. 
                  Furthermore, we can probably expect more versions of this symphony 
                  as 2011 unfolds and the centenary of Mahler’s death is marked 
                  – new ‘live’ recordings from Mariss Jansons in Amsterdam and 
                  from Rattle in Berlin are just being issued right now and I’m 
                  eager to hear both. I’m afraid that, despite its merits, this 
                  Järvi version can’t match several recordings that delve deeper 
                  into the music and produce a more compelling experience for 
                  the listener. 
                  
                  John Quinn 
                  
                  See also reviews by Gavin 
                  Dixon and Nick Barnard 
                Masterworks Index - Mahler’s 
                  Second Symphony