|
|
alternatively
CD: MDT
AmazonUK
£8.83 AmazonUS
|
Ludwig van BEETHOVEN
(1770-1827)
Piano Sonata No. 8 in C minor, Op. 13, Pathétique (1799)
[21:51]
Piano Sonata No. 17 in D minor, Op. 31/2 (1802) [25:48]
Piano Sonata No. 23 in F minor, Op. 57, Appassionata (1805)
[24:54]
Ingrid Fliter (piano)
rec. January and December 2011, Potton Hall, Suffolk, U.K.
EMI CLASSICS 094573 2 [72:58]
|
|
This is something quite special. Argentinean pianist Ingrid
Fliter has recorded two previous discs for EMI, both of Chopin
and both enthusiastically received. She now turns to Beethoven,
and since we probably can’t hope for a complete cycle from her,
the one disappointment about this issue is perhaps the unadventurous
choice of programme. I feel sure she knows more Beethoven sonatas
than these three pillars of the repertoire! At least, though,
EMI have treated her as a serious artist, with a very fine recording
and a substantial booklet note about the music from William
Kinderman rather than multiple photographs of the pianist herself.
The opening of the Pathétique is very grave indeed, the
darkness of the music underlined by the perfectly voiced chords
and, especially, by the presence of an underlying pulse. Fliter
launches into the first movement Allegro with huge gusto
and marvellously clear arpeggios. We have just got over her
deft handling of the mordents in the second subject when there
comes a surprise. The end of the exposition is signalled by
a pause, extended here, which should then revert to a repeat
of the exposition. As indeed it does, but Fliter chooses to
return to the very beginning of the slow introduction, and not,
as expected, to the beginning of the Allegro. Memory
can be fallible, but I don’t recall ever hearing the sonata
played like this, nor can I think of a performance of any other
Beethoven sonata where a similar decision is taken. What Fliter
does goes contrary to the score too, so why does she do it?
Is it because the following development section also begins
with a return to the slow, opening music, albeit, as is normal,
in another key? The result is undeniably arresting and effective,
but I do rather think that Beethoven knew best, and even if
we think he didn’t, we really ought to respect his opinion.
After this we are treated to seamless legato in the slow movement,
and a fair amount of skittish high spirits in the finale which,
in spite of the fact that the main theme sticks stubbornly in
the mind – and in spite of the work’s remarkable popularity
– is not one of Beethoven’s most inspired. Is some of the passagework
a little rushed in this movement? I think so, but it’s all to
the good, and one wants to applaud loudly at the end, which
was surely the composer’s intention.
The development section of the first movement of the D minor
Sonata (nicknamed, though not by Beethoven, the Tempest)
also begins with a return to the slow, rising arpeggio with
which the movement started, in which case the exposition repeat
beginning with this pensive yet dramatic gesture makes perfect
sense. The difference is that in this case the composer instructs
us to do it. The performance of the sonata is just as fine as
that of the Pathétique, and it is one played out at a
high level of tension. Garrick Ohlsson, in a performance on
Bridge I reviewed recently, retains more of a classical atmosphere
in the work, whilst relinquishing little or nothing in the way
of expressiveness. I was particularly impressed by that performance,
as I am by this one, in its own way. The curious, constantly
revolving semiquavers of the finale create a feeling of disquiet
in any successful performance, but Fliter goes further than
most, and certainly further than Ohlsson or Hélène Grimaud on
DG, in bringing out accents and fortissimi, to the point
that the movement takes on a not inappropriate grim relentlessness.
It is a more romantically inclined performance than the two
comparison performances, with greater use of the sustaining
pedal and with textures less analytical, more highly charged.
These characteristics become even more evident in the performance
of the towering Appassionata. Fliter works very hard
to bring out the conflict and contrast inherent in the first
movement, just as she does in the first movement of Op. 31/2,
but one is particularly struck by the power of her playing,
positively thunderous when required, with the closing bars almost
possessed. The slow movement is poised and tender, leading to
another stupendous performance of the finale. The tension never
lets up here, and the closing bars, from Beethoven’s Presto
marking onwards, are extraordinarily vehement.
Collectors will have their own favourite readings of each of
these sonatas, but none will be disappointed, I believe, by
these highly impassioned, impulsive performances. This is Beethoven
playing of a very high order.
William Hedley
|
|