|
|
alternatively
CD: AmazonUK
AmazonUS
Download: Classicsonline
|
Johann Sebastian BACH (1685–1750)
Concertos for Solo Harpsichord
CD 1
Concerto in D major, BWV 972 (after Antonio Vivaldi, RV230) [8:10]
Concerto in G major, BWV 973 (after Antonio Vivaldi, RV299) [7:58]
Concerto in g minor, BWV 975 (after Antonio Vivaldi, RV316) [8:56]
Concerto in C major, BWV 976 (after Antonio Vivaldi, RV265) [10:53]
Concerto in F major, BWV 978 (after Antonio Vivaldi, RV310) [7:31]
Concerto in G major, BWV 980 (after Antonio Vivaldi, RV381) [9:53]
Concerto in C major, BWV 977 (after an unknown composer) [7:19]
Concerto in g minor, BWV 983 (after an unknown composer) [8:58]
Concerto in G major, BWV 986 (after an unknown composer) [6:20]
CD 2
Concerto in b minor, BWV 979 (after Giuseppe Torelli) [12:13]
Concerto in d minor, BWV 974 (after Alessandro Marcello) [8:44]
Concerto in c minor, BWV 981 (after Benedetto Marcello, Op. 1, No.
2) [8:55]
Concerto in B flat major, BWV 982 (after Johann Ernst, Op. 1, No.
1) [8:42]
Concerto in C major, BWV 984 (after Johann Ernst) [8:27]
Concerto in d minor, BWV 987 (after Johann Ernst, Op. 1, No. 4)
[7:05]
Concerto in g minor, BWV 985 (after G. Philipp Telemann, TWV51:
g21) [7:28]
Prelude and Fugue in a minor, BWV 894 [12:08]
Elizabeth Farr (harpsichord)
rec. Ploger Hall, Manchester, Michigan, USA, August 2008. DDD.
NAXOS 8.572006-07 [76:26 + 74:09]
|
|
The works recorded here must not be confused with the more
popular and more frequently recorded pieces which are also
often known
as Bach’s solo harpsichord concertos, those for keyboard and
orchestra, BWV1052-9.
During his Weimar period, around 1713-14, Bach made 21 or 22
keyboard transcriptions of concertos by Italian and German composers.
The five or six for two keyboards and pedals (for the organ
or pedal harpsichord), BWV592-6 and the possibly spurious 597,
are comparatively well known and have been recorded a number
of times, including by Wolfgang Rübsam, the producer of the
current recording, for Naxos (8.550936).
What Bach did was, in a sense counter-intuitive; when Locatelli
made orchestral concertos out of Corelli’s sonatas, he added
extra colouring to the originals. Bach stripped his originals
of some of that colour, more so in the harpsichord arrangements
than in the organ concertos, though the versatility of Elizabeth
Farr’s instrument and of her playing restores a degree of the
colour.
The reasons why he made these transcriptions remain a matter
for speculation. Obviously, they were useful exercises for the
young composer, and Farr considers the implications of this
in her notes, but she also surmises that they may have had an
even more practical purpose in satisfying the requirements of
Prince Johann Ernst, himself an accomplished composer whose
music features among both the organ and harpsichord concertos,
and who was studying with the Weimar organist. This is not a
new theory – it is offered by Malcolm Boyd in his 1983 Master
Musicians book on Bach as the most likely reason for these compositions
– but it makes sense and it places the music on much the same
footing as the Well-tempered Clavier. If there is room
for recordings of that, why not have one of these concertos,
too?
Whether the sixteen harpsichord concertos are as worthy of a
modern recording as those intended for the more versatile organ,
when we have at our disposal recordings of the orchestral originals
in most cases, is a moot question. Given the limitations of
the harpsichord, would this 2-CD set turn out to be a 150-minute
yawn? In fact, Elizabeth Farr has to resort to a modicum of
trickery to prevent the boredom from setting in; though the
instrument which she employs is a modern reproduction by Keith
Hill of a Rütgers instrument, it possesses a 16’ stop. This
seems an odd decision when she made her earlier recording of
music by Peter Philips on an authentic instrument from only
slightly later than the music, an instrument restored by the
selfsame Keith Hill. (8.557864 – see review).
In his note in the booklet, Keith Hill admits that 18th-century
harpsichords with a 16’ set of strings were rare and the instrument
which he has created comes perilously close to recreating the
sound of the metal-framed monsters which we thought we had seen
the last of, as played by the likes of Rafael Puyana, pictured
on one Mercury LP sleeve seated at an instrument larger than
a modern concert grand. (See my review
of Peter Watchorn, Isolde Ahlgrimm and the Early Music Revival,
Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing, 2007).
Surprisingly, when I sold off that Puyana LP, I was offered
what I thought a ridiculously large sum for it, so there is
obviously still a demand for large-toned harpsichord recordings.
The new CDs should satisfy that demand – and I must admit that
Elizabeth Farr’s performances did mostly serve to still the
voice of authenticity within me.
Occasionally she goes at the music hammer-and-tongs, as in the
third movement of the b-minor concerto after Torelli, BWV979
(CD2, tr.3) and the adagio of the c-minor concerto after Marcello,
BWV981 (CD2, tr.12), but she also produces some extremely delicate
playing, as in the Adagio of the d-minor concerto after
Marcello, BWV974 (CD2, tr.8).
By comparison with Robert Woolley’s recording of the six concertos
after Vivaldi (details below), she adopts slower tempi in the
outer movements and faster tempi in the slow movements. Comparing
her version of BWV972 (CD1, trs.1-3) with Woolley’s, I have
a clear preference for the latter, made on a brighter-toned
harpsichord, a 1982 copy of a Franco-Flemish instrument.
Woolley takes a whole minute longer for the central Larghetto
– 3:48 against 2:47 – thereby giving real weight to the music
and providing a real contrast with his nimble-fingered tempi
for the opening Allegro – 2:20 against Farr’s 2:33 –
and Allegro finale – 2:19 against 2:50, all this achieved
without sounding at all hectic in the outer movements or sluggish
in the central movement. By comparison, Farr sounds too emphatic
at the opening of the first movement and elsewhere. In the Larghetto
her more versatile instrument allows her greater tone colour,
but I find her just too fast here to do justice to the music.
The second CD is completed with a performance of the Prelude
and Fugue in a minor, BWV894. Here my benchmark is another Hyperion
recording, from Angela Hewitt, who includes the work to conclude
her 2-CD set of the French Suites (CDA67121/2). As with
the Woolley recording, direct comparison with Hewitt – one of
the few pianists whose Bach I really like – is much faster in
both sections than Farr. Yet Hewitt’s Prelude sounds deliberate
rather than rushed and her fingers negotiate the fugue without
a hint of scrambling. Listen to the short samples from each,
on the Hyperion
website and Naxos’s sister website, classicsonline,
and you’ll see why I like Farr’s performance but prefer Hewitt.
Are Farr’s performances overall good enough for me to recommend
investing in the 2-CD set? In fact, she has already successfully
sold an even larger collection of keyboard music to my colleague
Kirk McElhearn, who thought that you really couldn’t go wrong
with her 3-CD set of Byrd’s keyboard music (8.570139-41 – see
review).
Glyn Pursglove also found her 2-CD recording of the music of
Elizabeth Jacquet de la Guerre convincing (8.557654/5 – see
review).
She employed four different instruments for the Byrd recording,
a lute-harpsichord, a single-manual and two two-manual harpsichords.
There might have been a case for such variety again here, though
the one instrument achieves a large degree of variety for the
very reason that caused my reservation, the use of 16’ tone
– to paraphrase TS Eliot, she achieves the right outcome for
the wrong reason.
I may have been a little too sniffy about the 16’ tone, but
I was less enthusiastic than KM or GP were about those earlier
recordings. I was, however, pleased enough with the outcome
to want to investigate her 2-CD set of Bach’s music for that
curious instrument the Lautenwerck or lute-harpsichord. As I
was writing this review my wife came into my study more often
than usual to share what she thought a wonderful sound, so I’m
out-voted.
Elizabeth Farr has the field more or less to herself in these
solo concertos. Her performances are never less than interesting
and the set is on offer at an attractive price, so it’s certainly
worth buying. The only rival of which I am aware is the recording,
referred to above, which Robert Woolley made of the six concertos
after Vivaldi for Hyperion in 1988, available only from the
Special Archive Service or as a download from Hyperion
(CDA66224, mp3 or lossless). The download is offered, in either
format, for a mere £5.99 – money well spent, perhaps in preference
to this Naxos set.
The Naxos recording is good and the documentation, by Elizabeth
Farr herself, detailed, informative and readable. There is also
a reasoned argument by Keith Hill for the specification of the
instrument which he built for her.
A recent batch of review CDs has brought Elizabeth Farr on another
Naxos 2-CD set, again using the 16’-capable Keith Hill instrument,
this time of the harpsichord music of Claude-Bénigne Balbastre
(8.572034/5). To the best of my knowledge, French instruments
never sported 16’ tone, so the result should be even more interesting
than the Bach CDs. Watch this space.
Brian Wilson
|
|