|
|
Availability
CD/Download: Pristine Classical
|
Karajan in New York - Vol.1
Ludwig van BEETHOVEN (1770 –
1827)
Symphony No.9 in D minor, op.125 (1824) [22:08]
Leontyne Price (soprano), Maureen Forrester (alto), Leopold Simoneau
(tenor), Norman Scott (bass), Westminster Choir (director: Warren
Martin), New York Philharmonic Orchestra/Herbert von Karajan
rec. 22 November 1958, Carnegie Hall, New York, NY, ADD
PRISTINE AUDIO PASC 222 [66:35]
|
Availability
CD/Download: Pristine Classical
|
Karajan in New York - Vol.2 Anton
von WEBERN (1883 – 1945)
Fünf Sätze, op.5 (1909) [10:02] Wolfgang
Amadeus MOZART (1757 – 1781)
Symphony No.41 in C, Jupiter, K551 (1788) [27:50] Ludwig
van BEETHOVEN (1770 – 1827)
Symphony No.1 in C, op.21 (1800) [22:08]
New York Philharmonic Orchestra/Herbert von Karajan
rec. 15 November 1958 (Mozart and Webern) and 22 November 1958 (Beethoven),
Carnegie Hall, New York, NY, ADD
PRISTINE AUDIO PASC 224 [63:05]
|
|
Karajan meets Murder Incorporated! What a meeting of minds
and sensibilities! Hardly had Leonard Bernstein taken the helm
in New York than along comes this European fellow to conduct
it in Viennese classics – to be honest, the Webern hadn’t yet
become a classic, this was only 13 years after his death and
he was still a seen as a “difficult” composer. Karajan is totally
at home in this repertoire, but he fails to bring to his performances
an old world charm.
As can be expected these are, what we now see as, old fashioned.
Mozart suffers the most with an orchestra which is far too big,
compared to what we are now used to – although it must be said
that the Webern Movements - Pristine calls the work Five
Pieces, which would be Fünf Stücke, but the correct
title is Fünf Sätze, Five Movements - gain in
strength and weight for the use of a large string body. Throughout
there is the heavy hand of “authority”. The tempi are well chosen,
even if the finale is brisk, and there’s never a dull moment,
but Mozart deserves more than this kind of treatment. One wonders
if the inclusion of Ein Heldenleben, in the second half
of this concert, prompted the use of such forces?
The Beethoven performances were given a week later, and what
a change there is in the size of the orchestra and the interpretations
for this concert! The 1st Symphony
has well chosen tempi, and there’s more of a classical feel
to the performance, but it’s still heavy-handed at times and
too strict, with little give and take.
The Ninth is a very fine affair. Karajan has the New Yorkers
breathless, as he launches a first movement of great power,
with a fine Allegro which is a little maestoso;
just what Beethoven ordered. There’s little time for rest here
and whilst Karajan ensures that he has a firm hand on the proceedings,
there’s still an element of real fantasy to the interpretation.
He had me wondering what was going to happen next! The scherzo
is another matter. Although the tempo is well chosen, Karajan
ignores both repeats in the first half, which is odd considering
the composer so obviously wanted the sections to be heard twice;
he wrote twelve first time bars at the end of the second section,
but you cannot play these without playing the first repeat.
It’s all to do with symmetry. In this performance the first
movement plays for 15:07 and the scherzo for 10:40, whereas
if Karajan observed the repeats it would have played for 13:46,
balancing the allegro perfectly, which is what Beethoven
intended. There is another, slight, problem. Once Karajan has
chosen his tempo he’s away but he keeps having to, almost imperceptibly,
slow down to allow for clear woodwind articulation. You will
feel this, and, because he does it often, you will begin to
wonder where the momentum has gone. That said, this is a thrilling
exposition of the scherzo and so good that it makes one
weep at the two miscalculations listed here. The slow movement
is a trifle hard-driven, Karajan refusing to let go and simply
allow the music to play. He builds the climax well, but it is
just a part of the whole, rather than the achievement of musical
discussion. Then we come to the finale, which, for me, is a
real problem. I have two niggles. First of all, Beethoven was
not a vocal composer so his “big tune” works marvellously when
played by the orchestra, but sounds cumbersome when sung. Second,
the tune itself; it isn’t strong enough to carry the kind of
symphonic argument Beethoven is desperate to achieve. As a symphonic
finale it is a failure, for it contains no musical apotheosis,
and after three magnificent movements if any Symphony needed
a really satisfactory musical conclusion, this is the work.
Here, the singers are good – the women are much better than
the men – but never do I feel the sense of exaltation which
is supposed to infuse the music.
Having said all that, these are exciting performances and see
Karajan weaving a little of his magic with an orchestra which
is known for not taking any prisoners; hence its nickname. The
sound is very good, but there is little bloom on the upper string
sound, and quite clear. These two disks are not for general
listening but there is much to enjoy and admire and I am glad
to have them in my collection, even if they couldn’t be my first
choice in any of the works, except, perhaps, the Webern. Well
done, Pristine Audio for giving us the chance to hear a couple
of Karajan’s very rare American appearances.
Bob Briggs
|
|