This recording
first appeared on the EMI debut label in 2002. Despite
some small reservations, Christopher Fifield clearly spotted
the Belcea Quartet’s potential when he wrote ‘this is an
agreeable programme devised by a string quartet to look
out for’ – see
review. In
fact, the recording went on to win prestigious awards and
the Belcea Quartet have since made several highly praised
recordings, notably of Britten and Bartók. Now that début
recording reappears after a comparatively short elapse
of time in the lowest price bracket. Rather confusingly,
it’s also recently appeared in the mid-price
EMI Recommends series,
where it remains available for slightly more than this
Encore reissue.
Unlike CF, whose
main reservation was that the Belceas had an excessively
exaggerated feel for phrasing, I was sold on these performances
from the start: they bring out all the emotion inherent
in the music without wallowing in it. The
Rosamunde theme
which gives No.13 its nickname is a case in point – performed
to perfection here. Their tempo for the opening movement
of this quartet is fairly spacious, but they refuse to
linger in the
Rosamunde variations in the
Andante slow
movement and their tempi for the remaining movements also
strike me as ideal. The Kodály Quartet (Naxos 8.550591)
get away, at 8:42, with a timing for the
Andante more
than a minute longer than the Belceas (7:21) and the Quartetto
Italiano also linger slightly longer (8:16). Schubert
apparently approved of the players who, at the work’s premiere,
performed this movement ‘rather slowly, but with great
purity and tenderness.’ Alas, we don’t know exactly what
he meant by ‘rather slowly’ but I can’t think that he would
have faulted the tempo set here (and by the Juillard Quartet,
at 7:19, which has been my standby hitherto – see below).
I played the Clifford
Curzon/Vienna Octet classic recording of the
Trout Quintet
immediately after this EMI reissue without any sense that
their performance of that work overshadowed the Belceas – apart,
of course, from the fact that the EMI DDD recording is
much better than the elderly Decca ADD. On that
Trout recording
the
andantino variations are taken fairly briskly,
loving the beauty of the music without loving it to death,
and there can be no higher praise than to say that the
same is true of the Belcea version of the
Rosamunde variations.
The reissue gives
me an opportunity to take stock of my Schubert string quartet
recordings and to note that the Juilliard Quartet’s versions
of Nos.12-15 are literally past their sell-by date (Sony
MY2K45617, no longer available) and the Vienna Philharmonic
Quartet’s version of
Death and the Maiden Quartet
(D810) is chiefly there as the coupling of the wonderful
Curzon/Vienna Octet version of the
Trout Quintet
- super-budget Eloquence 467 417-2 – sadly, the only single-CD
Decca recording of Curzon left in the catalogue: snap it
up before it, too, falls to the deletions axe.
The Belcea reissue
will do very nicely for the three quartets which it offers,
No.10 (D87), the incomplete
Quartetsatz (No.12,
D703) and the
Rosamunde Quartet (No.13, D804). With
ideal performances, well recorded, and a decent, if hardly
exhaustive, set of notes, in fact, this reissue will do
much more than nicely.
The Vienna version
will at least do for
Death and the Maiden (No.14). The
1964 Vienna ADD sound is a touch dry after the Belcea recording
but Curzon’s
Trout is a must-have, so their version
comes willy-nilly. Which leaves No.15, with Naxos and
the Kodály Quartet coming to the rescue in a work whose
considerable ‘demands
are well met here, in this triumphant performance by the
Kodály Quartet’ according to Terry Barfoot (8.557125 – see
review). I
haven’t heard this recording but, judging from the Kodály
Quartet’s Haydn performances, also on Naxos, which were
among the first CDs that I bought, and remain the staple
of my Haydn quartet collection, TB’s words of praise are
spot on. Michael Cookson thought it well performed and
recorded but preferred the Italian Quartet’s 2-CD set of
Nos.12-15 on Philips Duo 446 163-2 – see
review.
The undoubted
virtues of that Italian Quartet set, currently on offer
from one online dealer for a few pence more than the single
Belcea CD, are my sole reason for not recommending their
Encore reissue as sweeping the board completely. Why not
splurge and buy both – both are inexpensive – thereby obtaining
the fine Belcea version of the one work not included on
the Philips set, Quartet No.10 (D87)? It may be the work
of a 16-year-old, but it’s well worth hearing.
In any event,
don’t buy the Philips Duo at the expense of this EMI reissue,
which is almost self-recommending and a great bargain to
boot.
Brian Wilson