A boomy recording, with some distortion at climaxes, in a cavernous 
                acoustic, cannot disguise the fact that Stokowski finds a Mozartian 
                grace in the first movement of the symphony. At this gentle gait 
                the second subject relaxes smilingly with very little actual slackening 
                of the pace. 
              
After 
                  this friendly prelude, the long arching melodies of the slow 
                  movement are shaped as only Stokowski knew how. It should be 
                  over the top, yet it is worth noting how the often extreme rallentandos 
                  at the ends of phrases are cunningly gauged so that the music 
                  moves on again before it has fully stopped. Thus flow is maintained 
                  without the sensation of getting stuck at every lamp post that 
                  can beset even less indulgent, but heavier-handed, interpreters. 
                  As a further example of Stokowski’s mastery of mood and colour, 
                  when the oboe returns to its theme at the end, it doesn’t seem 
                  a repetition but rather an aftermath, as if we’ve been through 
                  a whole gamut of Carmen-like emotion in between.
                
The 
                  scherzo is a riot of folkloristic colour while rustic revelries 
                  are again to the fore in the finale This often veers towards 
                  a pace that is risky even for this hand-picked band, yet finding 
                  space for vocal, operatic moulding of the lyrical second subject.
                
I 
                  shall not be throwing out those performances that see this early 
                  piece as a youthful offering at the classical shrine, giving 
                  it a brisk, early-Beethoven purposefulness, especially those 
                  in fine modern sound. All the same, Stokowski finds more in 
                  this work than most of us thought existed.
                
The 
                  “most of us” alluded to may possibly have included Bizet himself. 
                  Whether he would have been so nonplussed by the “Arlésienne” 
                  suites is less certain. There are those for whom Bizet, even 
                  the relatively late Bizet of this work and “Carmen”, is to be 
                  treated with Gallic grace and restraint. For others he was the 
                  forerunner of the no-holds-barred verismo of Mascagni 
                  and Leoncavallo. Not unexpectedly, Stokowski is of the latter 
                  persuasion. The colours are strong, the emotions simple yet 
                  violent, as befits a country tale. It is an ideal counterpart 
                  to the cover illustration, a detail from a work by Corot in 
                  his most pre-Cézanne vein, with sharp contrasts and a geometrical 
                  design. It was a cunning choice. Just as Corot, it seems to 
                  say, could leave his more usual tranquil post-Constable manner 
                  and take a leap into the next century, so, too, could Bizet. 
                  And Stokowski shows us how. The famous “Adagietto”, I should 
                  add, is played with the most tender restraint, voluptuousness 
                  only hinted at.
                
A 
                  great Stokowski performance, then, even if “Stokowski performance” 
                  remains the operative phrase, since Stokowski never lets you 
                  forget that there’s an interpreter between you and the music.
                
Or 
                  does he? I followed “Children’s Corner” with the piano score 
                  and was struck by his fidelity to the text, in phrasing, dynamics 
                  and tempi. Curiously, I made the comparison with a “faithful” 
                  interpreter, Vittorio Gui (Naples 1968) and was more struck 
                  by the similarities than the differences. Gui, too, was a great 
                  musician with a way of getting to the heart of the music he 
                  was conducting. In spite of having a lesser orchestra, he and 
                  Stokowski agree, above all, in finding a bright-eyed, childlike 
                  innocence in the music. So in this case I am inclined to say 
                  we have here, not only a great Stokowski performance, but a 
                  great Debussy performance too. Although this recording is three 
                  years earlier, I found it better than the Bizet, if anything.
                
Richard 
                  Gate’s notes are a model of what we want from this type of release. 
                  There’s a brief history of earlier recordings of the works – 
                  the Debussy was the second complete recording ever – and other 
                  Stokowski versions of them: none in the case of the Debussy. 
                  There are reproductions of the original covers, a 1949 NY Times 
                  cutting with photos of Stokowski and six of the principals engaged 
                  in “his Symphony Orchestra” and other information about those 
                  taking part – a fairly mythical line-up.
                
Not 
                  just a disc for Stokowski fans, then, but one for all those 
                  who willingly exchange modern sound for the magic of a great 
                  interpreter.
                
              
Christopher 
                Howell
              
see 
                also Review 
                by Jonathan Woolf