Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor Rob Barnett Editor in Chief
John Quinn Contributing Editor Ralph Moore Webmaster
David Barker Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf MusicWeb Founder Len Mullenger
Leopold MOZART (1719-1787)
Sinfonia in G major (Eisen C8) [12:28]
Berchtesgadener Musik: ‘Kindersinfonie’ (‘Toy Symphony’)
[10:41]
Sinfonia in D major (Eisen D15) [14:08]
Sinfonia in A major (Eisen A1) [7:38]
Sinfonia in G major: ‘Neue Lambacher Sinfonie’ [24:03]
Toronto
Chamber Orchestra/Kevin Mallon
rec. St Anne’s Church, Toronto, Canada, 5-7 February 2007 NAXOS 8.570499 [69:15]
The
rehabilitation of Mozart père, as man, has been going on
for some time. His presentation in many popular accounts
of the life of Wolfgang Amadeus, as callously exploitative
and autocratic, as embittered by jealousy of his son’s
genius, has been at the very least tempered, if not entirely
refuted, by modern scholarship. We are in a better position,
now, to recognise why, at the time of his death, his friend
Dominicus Hagenauer, Abbot of St Peter’s in Salzburg, should
have written in his diary that “Leopold Mozart, who died
today, was a man of much wit and wisdom, and would have
been capable of good services to the state
beyond those of music … He was born in Augsburg, spent
most of his days in court service here, and yet had the
misfortune always to be persecuted and was far less beloved
here than in other great places of Europe”.
Leopold’s
music awaits a full revaluation. Such as I have heard suggests
a high level of competence - which need be no surprise
at all - a responsiveness to the work of composers younger
than himself, and an occasional capacity to rise to greater
heights than the ‘merely’ competent. A year or two ago
I was, for example, very favourably impressed by a recording
of his oratorio Der Mensch, ein Gottesmörder (1753)
in a performance conducted by Claudio Astronio. The recording
was distributed with issue 215 of the Italian magazine Amadeus – aptly
enough – as AM 215-2. That work showed a composer capable
of writing sacred music of unforced dignity and emotional
intimacy.
Here
we have a sampling of his symphonic writing in crisp and
idiomatic performances by the Naxos regular Kevin Mallon
and the Toronto Chamber Orchestra. The CD is enhanced by
the notes of Cliff Eisen, a leading authority on Leopold
and editor of his work, who tells us that the symphonies
belong to the years between the early 1740s and the early
1760s, though a few may date from the late 1760s or even
the early 1770s.
The
early Sinfonia in A major (Eisen A1) is scored for strings
alone; its three movements are elegant and assured, structurally
neat, though without any very great individuality. The
Sinfonia in D major (Eisen D15), another work in three
movements, adds two horns to the strings and the writing
displays a more attentive ear to textural effect, with
some unexpected touches and some attractive melodic invention.
With the Sinfonia in G major (Eisen G8) we hear a work
in four movements (allegro-andante-menuetto-allegro) which
has often been wrongly attributed to Wolfgang. Eisen is
surely right to suggest that this is one of Leopold’s later
compositions, it being a sophisticated piece of work, interesting
in terms both of structure and detail. The lengthiest work
here, the Sinfonia in G major, was also attributed to Wolfgang
for some years. All the documentary evidence argues for
Mozart senior being the symphony’s composer, but it is
easy to see how the error (perhaps a piece of “biographical-wishful-thinking” as
Eisen puts it) was made, such is the quality of the work
and its decidedly ‘modern’ manner. It’s a fine piece, notably
in the lengthy andante with its attractive melodies and
the stirring music of the closing allegro. A work such
as this makes it clear why Leopold Mozart deserves to be
taken seriously and why it is a cause for regret that we
seem to have lost many of his compositions.
The ‘hook’ for
the CD is the well known ‘Toy Symphony’ (so-called). There
is no very convincing reason for thinking this to be, with
any certainty, Leopold’s work. A number of manuscripts
survive, with many variants (including the number of movements)
and with attributions to several different composers. It
isn’t, of course, in any sense a symphony – as Eisen suggests,
it belongs rather to the genre of the Cassation. It is
good fun and it gets a lively enough performance, but it
isn’t the best reason for getting hold of this CD; a better
reason is offered by the other symphonies which make up
the bulk of the disc, which should be of interest to anyone
with a taste for the eighteenth-century symphony and, of
course, to any Mozartean not still in the grip of anti-Leopold
sentiments.
Reviews
from previous months Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the
discs reviewed. details We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin
Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to
which you refer.