Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor Rob Barnett Editor in Chief
John Quinn Contributing Editor Ralph Moore Webmaster
David Barker Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf MusicWeb Founder Len Mullenger
Dmitri SHOSTAKOVICH (1906 – 1975) Dances of the Dolls (1952) [11:22] Ten Aphorisms, op.13 (1927) [14:11]
Piano Sonata No.1, op.12 (1926) [12:50]
Piano Sonata No.2, op.61 (1942) [28:28]
Melvin Chen
(piano)
rec. 21-23 June 2006, Sosnoff Theatre, Richard B Fisher
Center for the Performing Arts, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson,
New York. DDD BRIDGE 9238 [67:17]
Shostakovich’s
crowning achievement for his own instrument is the set of 24
Preludes and Fugues, op.87 (1950/1951). This work has
tended to make us forget that his substantial piano output
stretches across his career from the Eight
Preludes, op.2 (1919/1920) to the Eleven
Variations on a Theme by Glinka, op.104a (1957). This
collection, therefore, is most welcome.
We
start with the Dances of the Dolls, which, although
the music is pure Shostakovich, consists of arrangements
of pieces from his Ballet Suites. These were, in
turn, compilations of arrangements from ballet,
film and theatre scores, made by Levon Atovm'yan. They
establish a most pleasant and innocent world. These are
delightful pieces and reasonably easy – I once played Petite
Ballerina (no.5) albeit without the clarity and accuracy
of Mr Chen.
The delightful
mood is quickly dispelled by the first Aphorism. Here
is Shostakovich the avant–gardist. The composer spent the
1920s in musical experimentation and the decade culminated
in the satirical opera The Nose. Each piece has its
own title and character. Ronald Stevenson has even suggested
that the Nocturne might be concerned with things which
go on during the night – such as hoch magandy – although
I doubt that Shostakovich had this in mind when composing
the piece. What can be said is that these are very disturbing,
and disturbed, pieces. Too short to outstay their welcome
but long enough to get under the skin and unnerve you. Even
the final Lullaby is disquieting, never settling into
the gentle bedtime song it is supposed to be.
The 1st Sonata predates
the Aphorisms by only a few months. It is an insane,
cataclysmic, kaleidoscopic turmoil of a piece. By the side
of this work the Aphorisms are quite Chopinesque!
This is no mere puff for a piece seldom heard. In one movement
in three sections, and playing for less time than the finale
of the 2nd Sonata, it makes its mark with
music of great violence and aggressive gestures. Again, this
is Shostakovich the experimenter, the mad professor. There’s
reminiscences of late Scriabin, Mossolov and even Roslavets,
though taken to extremes. The middle, slow, section offers
some respite, but it’s all quickly dispelled by the vigorous
finale, which barely gets going before being snuffed out
unceremoniously.
The 2nd Sonata is
a very mature work. Written midway between the two Zhdanov
purges (1936 and 1948) there might be some who see this work
as Shostakovich “watering down” his style so as to be more
acceptable to the State. Gone is the angry young man, gone
is the aggression. In comes a warmer atmosphere, and a more
easy-going temperament. But the mere fact that he is writing
a work as classical as a Sonata shows his strength
of character for such a work could have brought calls of formalism for
using decadent, not proletariat-friendly, means of composition.
There is much to admire in this work. The first movement
has two themes, one a sinuous idea which reminds me of flowing
water, and the other a more angular statement. The ideas
are developed briefly and the recapitulation uses the extremes
of the keyboard and bitonality - so not all of the young
man’s experiments are lost to us. The slow movement, Largo,
is another of those Shostakovich slow movements where the
music is pared to the bone. There’s little movement and even
less friendliness. The finale is a set of nine variations
on a simple, original, theme, which cover a variety of moods
and emotions, ending with a subdued return to the music of
the opening, accompanying the theme of the variations.
Chen is a fine
pianist. He gives marvellous performances of all the works
here recorded and doesn’t hold back when the music demands
some power. He also has ample reserves of tenderness and
poetry. This disk is, by turns, edifying, enlightening, terrifying
and entertaining.
Bob Briggs
Reviews
from previous months Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the
discs reviewed. details We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin
Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to
which you refer.