Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor Rob Barnett Editor in Chief
John Quinn Contributing Editor Ralph Moore Webmaster
David Barker Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf MusicWeb Founder Len Mullenger
Giacomo
PUCCINI (1858–1924) Toscanini: Complete Puccini Recordings La Bohème (1896)
Jan Peerce
(tenor) – Rodolfo;
Licia Albanese (soprano) – Mimi; Francesco Valentino
(baritone) – Marcello;
Nicola Moscona (bass) – Colline; Anne Mc Knight (soprano) – Musetta;
George Cehanovsky (baritone) – Schaunard; Salvatore Baccaloni
(bass) – Benoit/Alcindore); NBC Symphony Orchestra & Chorus/Arturo
Toscanini Manon Lescaut (1893)
Intermezzo & Act 3:
Mafalda Favero (soprano) – Manon Lescaut; Giovanni Malipiero
(tenor) – Des
Grieux; Mariano Stabile (baritone) – Lescaut; Giuseppe Nessi
(tenor) – Un lampionaio; Carlo Forti (bass) – Sergente; Orchestra
e Coro del Teatro alla Scala di Milano/Arturo Toscanini;
Intermezzo. NBC Symphony Orchestra/Arturo Toscanini
rec. studio recording in New York, 3, 10 February, 1946 (Bohème);
live recording, Milan, 11 May, 1946 (Manon Lescaut: Intermezzo & act
3); studio recording, New York, 10 December, 1949 (Manon
Lescaut: Intermezzo) ISTITUTO
DISCOGRAFICO ITALIANO IDIS 6530/31 [79:19
+ 49:15]
Arturo Toscanini conducted the premieres of four Puccini operas: Manon
Lescaut, La Bohème, La fanciulla del West and Turandot,
two years after the composer’s death. Still Puccini thought
that Toscanini was hostile to him and didn’t like his music.
There may lie some truth in this since Toscanini recorded
very little Puccini. What is included in this set is his
complete Puccini recordings. Of course it is valuable to
have these, even though the live recording of act 3 from Manon
Lescaut, from the re-opening of La Scala, is in dreadfully
bad sound.
The complete Bohème is quite another
matter, set down in the studio during two broadcast evenings
in February 1946. It would be tempting to say that this
should be the authentic Bohème for the reason that
Toscanini should know better than anyone else how Puccini
wanted the opera to be performed, but there are several
factors that tell against this. First of all the recording
was made fifty years after the premiere and during such
a long period of time a conductor’s view is apt to change.
We know that Toscanini’s late recordings often are considerably
faster than comparable versions from a couple of decades
earlier – I am talking of recordings from the late 1920s – and
even by then the maestro was a relatively elderly man,
whose youth was another 30 years back in time. Puccini
was right in his feeling that Toscanini disliked him it
is quite possible that the conductor deliberately worked
against Puccini’s will.
Moreover Sir Thomas Beecham, who
recorded the opera ten years after Toscanini in that legendary
version with Victoria de los Angeles and Jussi Björling,
stated that he had discussed Bohème with Puccini
and knew exactly how the composer wanted it and Beecham
and Toscanini are at the opposite poles in several respects.
Toscanini’s recording is, as far as I have been able to
find out, the fastest recording ever and also, in great
portions of the opera, the most inflexible with metronomic
adherence to a strict pulse. Beecham’s is, in close company
with Serafin’s, the slowest and also very free with sometimes
changes of tempo in almost every bar. Beecham is the romantic
who revels in the last drop of sentimentality, whereas
Toscanini creates as chilly, unromantic atmosphere, further
enhanced by the dry acoustics. It goes without saying that
the precision is immaculate and that is pure gain in the
complicated second act and, whether it is historically
authentic or not, the recording should be heard for the
sake of this act.
Then of course, Toscanini is no machine
and in central moments he can be just as flexible as any
other conductor, savouring a phrase, making a ritardando,
accentuating some instrumental detail, in short sculpting
the music memorably. And I do believe he loves this score,
at least some of the key scenes. Just listen to Che
gelida manina, where towards the end of the aria Toscanini
joins in with Jan Peerce and sings second tenor – and not
always in tune. In Mimi’s aria, which follows, the maestro
is at his most relaxed and gives Licia Albanese ample space
to mould the phrases, but when her big melody comes Toscanini
is so engrossed in the music that he almost drowns poor
Mimi with his singing. There are other key moments where
he gives his singers free reins, as for example Musetta’s
waltz aria in act 2. Elsewhere, as I have already intimidated,
his conducting is hard-driven and by and large the performance
lacks charm.
When it comes to the singing misgivings also have to be made. Jan
Peerce, who was one of Toscanini’s favourite tenors, is a
reliable singers as always and phrases sensitively but his
voice lacks the melting tone and the brilliance of Björling
or Bergonzi or the honeyed delivery of Tagliavini on the
Santini set. He is quite good however in the encounter with
Mimi in the first act where he sings with a great deal of
feeling. Licia Albanese unfortunately sounds more like a
soubrette with thin tone and is a far cry from the lovely
Victoria de los Angeles and the creamy but slightly matronly
Renata Tebaldi. Her girlish timbre is still quite affecting
in Mi chiamano Mimi and she sings with considerable
warmth in Sono andati in the last act. Anne Mc Knightas
Musetta is another razor-sharp soubrette and not too easy
to tell from Mimi, but she has all the notes and the technique
for her second act aria. The other bohemians are rather anonymous
with a partly sorely strained Marcello. Only Nicola Moscona
stands out with a warm coat aria in the last act. The most
memorable impersonation is Salvatore Baccaloni’s vivid Benoit,
a larger-than-life caricature in the Fernando Corena mould.
The La Scala recording of Manon Lescaut has a value primarily
as a documentation of the event but it gives very little
listening pleasure with a lot of background noise, scrawny
string tone and occasional drop-outs. Of the distinguished
singers Malipiero’s heroic tenor occasionally shines through
and Stabile’s expressive acting is also acceptably reproduced
a couple of times. The end of the act, where the tenor has
his best opportunities, is practically inaudible.
The studio recording of the intermezzo is much better but it doesn’t
belong to the best of Toscanini’s recordings sonically speaking.
It is however an impassioned and high-voltage reading.
The booklet has an essay by Danilo Prefumo who is also responsible
for the digital remastering. On the last page of the booklet
there is a photo of Puccini and Toscanini that seems to confirm
the supposed animosity between them. They don’t seem to be
on speaking terms.
As a historical document it is interesting but hardly a first choice
for a library recording of the opera. Santini (Cetra), Beecham
(EMI or Naxos), Serafin (Decca) and even Leinsdorf (Sony
BMG) are far preferable and the last two are in excellent
stereo.
Reviews
from previous months Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the
discs reviewed. details We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin
Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to
which you refer.