Rousseau’s 
                  little opera was written immediately after the successful production 
                  of Pergolesi’s “La Serva Padrona” in Paris in 1752. That 
                  had started up a new round of the “querelle des bouffons” (quarrels 
                  of the buffoons) between supporters of the French and Italian 
                  styles of opera. Rousseau had been a strong supporter of the 
                  Italian style since his time in Venice (1743-1744) and wrote 
                  “Le Devin du Village” (The Village Soothsayer) as a French 
                  counterpart to the Italian intermezzi. Amazingly, despite its 
                  flimsy, almost non-existent, plot, it was an instant success 
                  in France and elsewhere. Early private performances included 
                  Marie-Antoinette and Madame de Pompadour as performers, and 
                  in due course it acted indirectly as the model for Mozart’s 
                  early singspiel “Bastien und Bastienne”. It is 
                  a work which is referred to in all musical histories of the 
                  period but which is seldom performed. When it is there is a 
                  considerable surprise, as despite being intended to champion 
                  the Italian style, both its general musical character and the 
                  cut of individual phrases are very clearly French. It does indeed 
                  come across as eclectic in style, with pleasant tunes and orchestration 
                  but lacking any very strongly defined character of its own. 
                  It is nonetheless charming, if overlong, and it is a pleasure 
                  to be able to hear it in such a clear and stylish performance. 
                
It 
                  appears from photographs in the full and helpful booklet that 
                  the recording derives from a staged production in Solothurn 
                  in Switzerland. All three soloists are clearly well aware of 
                  the demands and conventions of music of this period. Whilst 
                  from the point of view of the plot I might have preferred the 
                  singer of the soothsayer to sound older than the other two soloists, 
                  the virtually complete inherent absence of dramatic tension 
                  means that his obvious youth is not a serious fault. I am certainly 
                  prepared to overlook it when, like all of the singers, he sounds 
                  so fresh and so involved in his part. The choir do what little 
                  they have to do well, and the orchestra, on period instruments, 
                  play very stylishly throughout. The booklet indicates that horn 
                  parts have been added by Thomas Leininger to replace those that 
                  were probably originally improvised. I have been unable to obtain 
                  a score so that I am unclear whether the same applies to the 
                  occasional percussion parts.
                
              
This 
                is therefore a very good chance to hear a work more written about 
                than played. I have not heard the various other recordings that 
                have been available from time to time, but it is hard to imagine 
                much more being made of it, and if in the end we may conclude 
                that its proper place is as a footnote in history, it remains 
                a curiosity worth exploring. Certainly Rousseau does deserve his 
                place amongst those composers worth hearing but better known for 
                their literary works, and which includes such names as Anthony 
                Burgess, Samuel Butler and E.T.A. Hoffmann.
                
                John Sheppard