In 
                  the booklet for this disc Robin Stowell describes how musicologists 
                  and musicians from generations after Bach have dealt with his 
                  six works for solo violin. He also refers to the so-called 'Bach 
                  bow', with which violinists tried to realise the polyphony in 
                  these compositions. And then he continues: "How refreshing 
                  and fascinating it now is to be able to listen to the likes 
                  of Jacqueline Ross performing these challenging works using 
                  Bach's autograph as the principal source along with the form 
                  of the instrument and bow that Bach would have employed!" 
                  One would almost think this is a fully new development. But 
                  there are many recordings with period instruments available, 
                  and the oldest date from more than forty years ago! And does 
                  anyone still believe that the 'Bach bow' has any historical 
                  relevance.
                
The 
                  three partitas and three sonatas for violin solo were composed 
                  at the latest in 1720, when Bach lost his position as 'Hofkapellmeister' 
                  in Cöthen. There is no certainty as to why Bach wrote them. 
                  Some suggest he may have played them during concerts at the 
                  court in Cöthen. That is a possibility: Bach was a most accomplished 
                  violinist after all. But it is also possible Bach did not have 
                  performances in mind when he wrote these works. They could also 
                  be considered explorations of various compositional techniques 
                  as well as of the possibilities of the instrument. In that case 
                  one could compare them with keyboard works like the Wohltemperirte 
                  Clavier or the Kunst der Fuge.
                
In 
                  these six solos Bach pays tribute to the two national styles 
                  then dominant in Europe. In the three Sonatas he links up with 
                  the Italian 'sonata da chiesa'. They all consist of four movements 
                  (slow-fast-slow-fast), the second of which is a fugue. The three 
                  Partitas are influenced by the French style and consist of dance 
                  movements; the number of movements increases from four (Partita 
                  No. 1) to six (Partita No. 3). In particular the second is modelled 
                  after the French suite as it closes with an extended chaconne. 
                  Despite the Italian and French influences these solos have an 
                  unmistakable German flavour, in particular because of the use 
                  of polyphony.
                
This 
                  is the second volume of the complete recording of Bach's Sonatas 
                  and Partitas for violin solo; the first volume I am not acquainted 
                  with. When I started listening there were several aspects of 
                  her performances which I noticed with satisfaction. She seems 
                  to be well aware of the rhetorical nature of these compositions, 
                  and as a result adopts a strongly speaking style of playing, 
                  in line with the baroque principle of 'music as speech'. I like 
                  the clear articulation and the differentiation between good 
                  and bad notes. Other positive aspects are a good sense of rhythm 
                  and the contrast between and within movements, although I think 
                  this could be stronger, for instance within the chaconne from 
                  the Partita No. 2. I would also have liked to hear more dynamic 
                  shades. The preludio of the Partita No. 3 is played with panache, 
                  and I really liked the dancing rhythm of the gavotte en rondeau. 
                  The menuets of this partita are also very well done, with some 
                  nice ornamentation.
                
So 
                  there is definitely a lot to enjoy. But there is one thing which 
                  bothers me: Ms Ross tends to give too much emphasis to the first 
                  note of chords, which sometimes makes them fall apart. As a 
                  result the rhythmic pulse, which I admire in these interpretations, 
                  is sometimes undermined. That is certainly the case in the fugue 
                  of the Sonata No. 3: the emphasis on the first note of the chord 
                  adds a fraction to the time of the chord and disrupts the rhythm, 
                  which otherwise is well realised. As I can't believe this is 
                  a technical shortcoming, it must be a deliberate artistic decision, 
                  which I don't understand.
                
              
So 
                far I haven't heard a recording which satisfies me in every respect, 
                and maybe such an interpretation is an illusion anyway. Keeping 
                that in mind I do not hesitate in recommending  this recording. 
                It should be ranked among the best available, at least on the 
                basis of this second volume.
                
                Johan van Veen